Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Mid-South Conference Women's Volleyball Team Stats

Rk Team gp sh g gfa a pts sh% shpg
0.1926605504587156 1 Campbellsville (KY) 19 327 63 3.32 36 162 .193 17.2
0.18875502008032127 2 Thomas More 20 249 47 2.35 49 143 .189 12.4
0.18414322250639387 3 Tennessee Southern 24 391 72 3.00 62 206 .184 16.3
0.15789473684210525 4 Shawnee State 19 323 51 2.68 23 125 .158 17.0
0.15363128491620112 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 23 358 55 2.39 53 163 .154 15.6
0.1511627906976744 6 Bethel (TN) 18 258 39 2.17 24 102 .151 14.3
0.1476510067114094 7 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 18 149 22 1.22 19 63 .148 8.3
0.14035087719298245 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 17 228 32 1.88 18 82 .140 13.4
0.13765182186234817 9 Lindsey Wilson 17 247 34 2.00 31 99 .138 14.5
0.1323943661971831 10 Cumberland (TN) 18 355 47 2.61 58 152 .132 19.7
0.10810810810810811 11 Pikeville 18 148 16 0.89 9 41 .108 8.2
Rk Team gp ga gaa sv so
0.10810810810810811 1 Pikeville 18 65 3.72 176 2
0.1476510067114094 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 18 43 2.39 117 4
0.14035087719298245 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 17 41 2.41 125 1
0.1511627906976744 4 Bethel (TN) 18 37 2.07 84 4
0.13765182186234817 5 Lindsey Wilson 17 32 1.88 96 3
0.18414322250639387 6 Tennessee Southern 24 31 1.33 96 10
0.1926605504587156 7 Campbellsville (KY) 19 31 1.61 80 5
0.15789473684210525 8 Shawnee State 19 31 1.63 74 4
0.18875502008032127 9 Thomas More 20 27 1.41 57 7
0.1323943661971831 10 Cumberland (TN) 18 22 1.22 72 7
0.15363128491620112 11 Cumberlands (Ky.) 23 19 0.81 81 12
Rk Team gp yc rc ck
0.18414322250639387 1 Tennessee Southern 24 23 2 124
0.15363128491620112 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 23 10 0 124
0.13765182186234817 3 Lindsey Wilson 17 13 0 95
0.1323943661971831 4 Cumberland (TN) 18 23 0 95
0.1511627906976744 5 Bethel (TN) 18 13 0 93
0.18875502008032127 6 Thomas More 20 15 1 92
0.15789473684210525 7 Shawnee State 19 11 0 90
0.14035087719298245 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 17 19 0 83
0.1926605504587156 9 Campbellsville (KY) 19 16 0 58
0.10810810810810811 10 Pikeville 18 10 0 53
0.1476510067114094 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 18 8 0 44
Rk Team gp sh g gfa a pts sh% shpg
0.1878453038674033 1 Campbellsville (KY) 10 181 34 3.40 22 90 .188 18.1
0.21052631578947367 2 Thomas More 10 114 24 2.40 24 72 .211 11.4
0.21794871794871795 3 Tennessee Southern 10 156 34 3.40 33 101 .218 15.6
0.09649122807017543 4 Shawnee State 11 114 11 1.00 5 27 .096 10.4
0.1751412429378531 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 11 177 31 2.82 31 93 .175 16.1
0.1450381679389313 6 Bethel (TN) 10 131 19 1.90 12 50 .145 13.1
0.11475409836065574 7 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 10 61 7 0.70 5 19 .115 6.1
0.1 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 100 10 1.00 6 26 .100 10.0
0.15846994535519127 9 Lindsey Wilson 10 183 29 2.90 25 83 .158 18.3
0.1179245283018868 10 Cumberland (TN) 10 212 25 2.50 29 79 .118 21.2
0.08771929824561403 11 Pikeville 10 57 5 0.50 5 15 .088 5.7
Rk Team gp ga gaa sv so
0.08771929824561403 1 Pikeville 10 46 4.86 109 0
0.11475409836065574 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 10 33 3.30 69 0
0.1 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 27 2.70 75 1
0.1450381679389313 4 Bethel (TN) 10 26 2.60 50 0
0.15846994535519127 5 Lindsey Wilson 10 14 1.40 52 3
0.21794871794871795 6 Tennessee Southern 10 10 1.00 38 5
0.1878453038674033 7 Campbellsville (KY) 10 13 1.30 43 4
0.09649122807017543 8 Shawnee State 11 26 2.37 55 1
0.21052631578947367 9 Thomas More 10 17 1.77 38 4
0.1179245283018868 10 Cumberland (TN) 10 11 1.10 32 5
0.1751412429378531 11 Cumberlands (Ky.) 11 6 0.55 38 6
Rk Team gp yc rc ck
0.21794871794871795 1 Tennessee Southern 10 7 1 58
0.1751412429378531 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 11 5 0 76
0.15846994535519127 3 Lindsey Wilson 10 7 0 65
0.1179245283018868 4 Cumberland (TN) 10 16 0 59
0.1450381679389313 5 Bethel (TN) 10 9 0 43
0.21052631578947367 6 Thomas More 10 5 0 44
0.09649122807017543 7 Shawnee State 11 4 0 36
0.1 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 9 0 35
0.1878453038674033 9 Campbellsville (KY) 10 8 0 35
0.08771929824561403 10 Pikeville 10 5 0 28
0.11475409836065574 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 10 5 0 17