Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Baseball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
18.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 52 1656 543 407 238 304 .328 .427 .533
13.0 2 Concordia (MI) 62 1888 586 416 252 402 .310 .409 .480
18.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 1643 503 328 215 366 .306 .411 .470
12.0 4 Cornerstone 44 1333 395 262 162 341 .296 .388 .476
11.0 5 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1403 412 341 207 317 .294 .400 .483
12.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 1412 411 280 196 310 .291 .398 .457
22.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1588 444 270 185 351 .280 .377 .392
8.0 8 Lourdes 47 1383 376 255 185 290 .272 .374 .420
15.0 9 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1079 290 147 105 218 .269 .347 .370
28.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1269 336 208 180 293 .265 .379 .380
19.0 11 Siena Heights 51 1476 373 199 189 274 .253 .350 .317
9.0 12 Rochester 36 1056 263 168 143 313 .249 .355 .368
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
13.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 136 13 53 202
18.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 116 11 67 194
18.0 2 Indiana Tech 53 116 17 40 173
11.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 87 11 52 150
12.0 5 Lawrence Tech 47 81 18 39 138
12.0 5 Cornerstone 44 80 15 43 138
22.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 91 15 19 125
8.0 8 Lourdes 47 75 14 34 123
28.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 44 60 22 14 96
9.0 10 Rochester 36 60 3 20 83
15.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 51 14 10 75
19.0 12 Siena Heights 51 54 10 7 71
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
13.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 485 907 120 35
18.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 439 882 73 19
18.0 2 Indiana Tech 53 384 773 56 24
11.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 374 677 39 11
12.0 5 Lawrence Tech 47 330 645 116 40
22.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 315 622 58 21
12.0 7 Cornerstone 44 289 634 58 11
8.0 8 Lourdes 47 286 581 42 9
28.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 44 232 482 37 15
19.0 10 Siena Heights 51 225 468 31 15
9.0 11 Rochester 36 191 389 39 20
15.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 36 168 399 13 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
13.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 80 25 41 30 387 483 .80 2286
18.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 70 31 17 30 320 435 .74 2012
18.0 2 Indiana Tech 53 90 20 42 31 383 384 1.00 2010
22.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 75 20 19 32 354 411 .86 1887
19.0 5 Siena Heights 51 37 10 17 30 376 395 .95 1729
12.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 69 22 18 17 312 363 .86 1717
11.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 43 55 18 11 21 224 370 .61 1694
8.0 8 Lourdes 47 53 19 11 29 334 362 .92 1651
12.0 9 Cornerstone 44 47 16 18 21 263 329 .80 1576
28.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 66 19 15 22 288 335 .86 1549
9.0 11 Rochester 36 35 10 15 4 184 170 1.08 1259
15.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 36 32 13 13 28 270 256 1.05 1242
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
15.0 1 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 268.0 397 298 260 8.73
9.0 2 Rochester 36 36 268.1 348 310 248 8.32
22.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 383.0 485 396 329 7.73
19.0 4 Siena Heights 51 51 363.2 430 336 304 7.52
12.0 5 Cornerstone 44 44 323.2 369 309 267 7.42
8.0 6 Lourdes 47 47 339.2 400 291 254 6.73
28.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 324.0 363 297 240 6.67
11.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 337.2 387 296 235 6.26
13.0 9 Concordia (MI) 62 62 459.0 490 343 282 5.53
18.0 10 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 407.0 401 272 247 5.46
12.0 11 Lawrence Tech 47 47 358.2 367 252 208 5.22
18.0 12 Indiana Tech 53 53 400.0 414 264 231 5.20
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
9.0 1 Rochester 36 36 237 7.95 23 2.05
15.0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 167 5.61 25 2.00
22.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 307 7.21 25 1.83
12.0 4 Cornerstone 44 44 230 6.40 32 1.74
28.0 5 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 234 6.50 26 1.72
19.0 6 Siena Heights 51 51 243 6.01 34 1.67
11.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 331 8.82 25 1.67
13.0 8 Concordia (MI) 62 62 427 8.37 46 1.65
8.0 9 Lourdes 47 47 240 6.36 32 1.62
12.0 10 Lawrence Tech 47 47 413 10.36 34 1.52
18.0 11 Indiana Tech 53 53 419 9.43 50 1.49
18.0 11 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 434 9.60 33 1.45
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
18.0 1 Indiana Tech 53 1682 1200 421 61 20 .964
19.0 2 Siena Heights 51 1522 1087 378 57 12 .963
18.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 52 1694 1221 408 65 16 .962
22.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1667 1148 450 69 28 .959
8.0 5 Lourdes 47 1449 1019 370 60 24 .959
13.0 6 Concordia (MI) 62 1923 1377 460 86 22 .955
12.0 7 Lawrence Tech 47 1500 1076 355 69 28 .954
11.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1429 1010 350 69 9 .952
12.0 9 Cornerstone 44 1405 971 366 68 29 .952
28.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1410 951 390 69 16 .951
15.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1169 802 296 71 16 .939
9.0 12 Rochester 36 1095 790 236 69 21 .937
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
28.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 44 22 70 28 .286 1
22.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 25 72 22 .234 0
19.0 3 Siena Heights 51 22 52 19 .268 0
18.0 4 Indiana Tech 53 21 64 18 .220 1
18.0 4 Northwestern Ohio 52 34 49 18 .269 0
15.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 36 19 41 15 .268 1
13.0 7 Concordia (MI) 62 36 57 13 .186 0
12.0 8 Lawrence Tech 47 23 66 12 .154 3
12.0 8 Cornerstone 44 29 36 12 .250 0
11.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 43 27 41 11 .212 0
9.0 11 Rochester 36 19 45 9 .167 0
8.0 12 Lourdes 47 17 73 8 .099 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
18.0 1 Indiana Tech 13 1,353 105
22.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 14 1,235 89
13.0 3 Concordia (MI) 15 944 63
8.0 4 Lourdes 18 923 52
18.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 27 1,283 48
15.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 13 601 47
9.0 7 Rochester 12 555 47
12.0 8 Lawrence Tech 18 785 44
12.0 8 Cornerstone 12 395 33
19.0 10 Siena Heights 18 455 26
11.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
28.0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 14 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
4.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 655 226 197 101 102 .345 .447 .608
4.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 691 200 122 86 128 .289 .383 .447
6.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 679 213 161 96 149 .314 .428 .502
4.0 4 Cornerstone 22 664 200 143 95 139 .301 .404 .492
8.0 5 Madonna (Mich.) 22 702 214 177 96 158 .305 .409 .494
6.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 691 204 141 84 123 .295 .388 .482
11.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 672 177 103 81 147 .263 .370 .388
5.0 8 Lourdes 22 666 179 106 70 126 .269 .357 .422
12.0 9 Michigan-Dearborn 22 651 174 73 67 125 .267 .349 .343
18.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 618 154 85 79 150 .249 .362 .354
14.0 11 Siena Heights 22 665 162 88 86 122 .244 .341 .296
8.0 12 Rochester 22 644 163 98 86 179 .253 .353 .356
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
4.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 44 4 19 67
4.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 58 6 34 98
6.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 49 11 19 79
8.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 43 6 26 75
6.0 5 Lawrence Tech 22 35 8 26 69
4.0 6 Cornerstone 22 44 7 23 74
11.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 46 7 8 61
5.0 8 Lourdes 22 33 6 19 58
18.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 27 13 4 44
8.0 10 Rochester 22 38 2 8 48
12.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 27 5 4 36
14.0 12 Siena Heights 22 21 4 2 27
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
4.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 145 309 28 12
4.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 207 398 32 11
6.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 182 341 24 11
8.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 199 347 24 4
6.0 5 Lawrence Tech 22 156 333 42 18
11.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 116 261 12 13
4.0 7 Cornerstone 22 157 327 31 6
5.0 8 Lourdes 22 115 281 13 1
18.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 94 219 18 8
14.0 10 Siena Heights 22 96 197 15 7
8.0 11 Rochester 22 111 229 12 11
12.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 22 84 223 8 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
4.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 25 10 18 17 164 191 .86 830
4.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 32 15 4 15 142 182 .78 807
6.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 45 7 23 11 150 169 .89 850
11.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 37 7 4 14 155 174 .89 801
14.0 5 Siena Heights 22 15 5 5 13 176 188 .94 776
6.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 27 9 15 8 164 197 .83 826
8.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 22 34 10 6 12 104 201 .52 848
5.0 8 Lourdes 22 25 6 8 19 175 179 .98 775
4.0 9 Cornerstone 22 26 9 9 12 150 172 .87 803
18.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 35 8 11 14 157 158 .99 751
8.0 11 Rochester 22 17 6 10 4 161 137 1.18 763
12.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 22 18 7 12 18 188 167 1.13 755
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
12.0 1 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 168.0 250 176 154 8.25
8.0 2 Rochester 22 22 164.2 210 172 143 7.82
11.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 168.0 194 173 146 7.82
14.0 4 Siena Heights 22 22 163.2 209 160 143 7.86
4.0 5 Cornerstone 22 22 164.1 190 144 122 6.68
5.0 6 Lourdes 22 22 167.0 200 161 147 7.92
18.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 165.1 196 147 114 6.21
8.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 166.2 163 120 90 4.86
4.0 9 Concordia (MI) 22 22 174.0 184 138 121 6.26
4.0 9 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 167.0 156 91 81 4.37
6.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 22 178.1 159 88 72 3.63
6.0 11 Indiana Tech 22 22 168.0 155 92 71 3.80
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
8.0 1 Rochester 22 22 135 7.38 14 2.00
12.0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 107 5.73 17 1.95
11.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 120 6.43 12 1.88
4.0 4 Cornerstone 22 22 112 6.13 16 1.76
18.0 5 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 108 5.88 9 1.71
14.0 6 Siena Heights 22 22 102 5.61 19 1.71
8.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 155 8.37 13 1.45
4.0 8 Concordia (MI) 22 22 152 7.86 27 1.66
5.0 9 Lourdes 22 22 98 5.28 22 1.64
6.0 10 Lawrence Tech 22 22 198 9.99 16 1.22
6.0 10 Indiana Tech 22 22 184 9.86 19 1.35
4.0 12 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 177 9.54 8 1.32
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
6.0 1 Indiana Tech 22 706 504 175 27 15 .962
14.0 2 Siena Heights 22 695 491 174 30 5 .957
4.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 22 706 501 179 26 9 .963
11.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 724 503 201 20 9 .972
5.0 5 Lourdes 22 724 501 195 28 15 .961
4.0 6 Concordia (MI) 22 710 522 159 29 10 .959
6.0 7 Lawrence Tech 22 746 535 184 27 15 .964
8.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 711 500 176 35 5 .951
4.0 9 Cornerstone 22 703 493 177 33 19 .953
18.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 735 496 203 36 10 .951
12.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 733 503 181 49 8 .933
8.0 12 Rochester 22 707 494 173 40 10 .943
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
18.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 22 15 28 18 .391 1
11.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 12 29 11 .275 0
14.0 3 Siena Heights 22 8 19 14 .424 0
6.0 4 Indiana Tech 22 7 18 6 .250 0
4.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 22 19 10 4 .286 0
12.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 22 15 25 12 .324 1
4.0 7 Concordia (MI) 22 14 16 4 .200 0
6.0 8 Lawrence Tech 22 13 17 6 .261 0
4.0 9 Cornerstone 22 16 16 4 .200 0
8.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 22 16 15 8 .348 0
8.0 10 Rochester 22 12 21 8 .276 0
5.0 12 Lourdes 22 10 45 5 .100 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
6.0 1 Indiana Tech 10 1,087 109
11.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 12 1,114 93
4.0 3 Concordia (MI) 10 731 74
5.0 4 Lourdes 12 722 61
4.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 16 815 51
12.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 12 601 51
8.0 7 Rochester 10 555 56
6.0 8 Lawrence Tech 10 590 59
4.0 9 Cornerstone 10 295 30
14.0 10 Siena Heights 10 310 31
8.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
18.0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 10 0 0