Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Baseball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
34.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 52 1656 543 407 238 304 .328 .427 .533
36.0 2 Concordia (MI) 62 1888 586 416 252 402 .310 .409 .480
21.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 1643 503 328 215 366 .306 .411 .470
29.0 4 Cornerstone 44 1333 395 262 162 341 .296 .388 .476
27.0 5 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1403 412 341 207 317 .294 .400 .483
23.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 1412 411 280 196 310 .291 .398 .457
25.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1588 444 270 185 351 .280 .377 .392
17.0 8 Lourdes 47 1383 376 255 185 290 .272 .374 .420
19.0 9 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1079 290 147 105 218 .269 .347 .370
22.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1269 336 208 180 293 .265 .379 .380
22.0 10 Siena Heights 51 1476 373 199 189 274 .253 .350 .317
19.0 12 Rochester 36 1056 263 168 143 313 .249 .355 .368
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
36.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 136 13 53 202
34.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 116 11 67 194
21.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 116 17 40 173
27.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 87 11 52 150
29.0 5 Cornerstone 44 80 15 43 138
23.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 81 18 39 138
25.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 91 15 19 125
17.0 8 Lourdes 47 75 14 34 123
22.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 44 60 22 14 96
19.0 10 Rochester 36 60 3 20 83
19.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 36 51 14 10 75
22.0 12 Siena Heights 51 54 10 7 71
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
36.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 485 907 120 35
34.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 439 882 73 19
21.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 384 773 56 24
27.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 374 677 39 11
23.0 5 Lawrence Tech 47 330 645 116 40
25.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 315 622 58 21
29.0 7 Cornerstone 44 289 634 58 11
17.0 8 Lourdes 47 286 581 42 9
22.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 44 232 482 37 15
22.0 9 Siena Heights 51 225 468 31 15
19.0 11 Rochester 36 191 389 39 20
19.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 168 399 13 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
36.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 80 25 41 30 387 483 .80 2286
34.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 70 31 17 30 320 435 .74 2012
21.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 90 20 42 31 383 384 1.00 2010
25.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 75 20 19 32 354 411 .86 1887
22.0 5 Siena Heights 51 37 10 17 30 376 395 .95 1729
23.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 69 22 18 17 312 363 .86 1717
27.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 43 55 18 11 21 224 370 .61 1694
17.0 8 Lourdes 47 53 19 11 29 334 362 .92 1651
29.0 9 Cornerstone 44 47 16 18 21 263 329 .80 1576
22.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 66 19 15 22 288 335 .86 1549
19.0 11 Rochester 36 35 10 15 4 184 170 1.08 1259
19.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 32 13 13 28 270 256 1.05 1242
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
19.0 1 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 268.0 397 298 260 8.73
19.0 1 Rochester 36 36 268.1 348 310 248 8.32
25.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 383.0 485 396 329 7.73
22.0 4 Siena Heights 51 51 363.2 430 336 304 7.52
29.0 5 Cornerstone 44 44 323.2 369 309 267 7.42
17.0 6 Lourdes 47 47 339.2 400 291 254 6.73
22.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 324.0 363 297 240 6.67
27.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 337.2 387 296 235 6.26
36.0 9 Concordia (MI) 62 62 459.0 490 343 282 5.53
34.0 10 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 407.0 401 272 247 5.46
23.0 11 Lawrence Tech 47 47 358.2 367 252 208 5.22
21.0 12 Indiana Tech 53 53 400.0 414 264 231 5.20
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
19.0 1 Rochester 36 36 237 7.95 23 2.05
19.0 1 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 167 5.61 25 2.00
25.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 307 7.21 25 1.83
29.0 4 Cornerstone 44 44 230 6.40 32 1.74
22.0 5 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 234 6.50 26 1.72
22.0 5 Siena Heights 51 51 243 6.01 34 1.67
27.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 331 8.82 25 1.67
36.0 8 Concordia (MI) 62 62 427 8.37 46 1.65
17.0 9 Lourdes 47 47 240 6.36 32 1.62
23.0 10 Lawrence Tech 47 47 413 10.36 34 1.52
21.0 11 Indiana Tech 53 53 419 9.43 50 1.49
34.0 12 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 434 9.60 33 1.45
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
21.0 1 Indiana Tech 53 1682 1200 421 61 20 .964
22.0 2 Siena Heights 51 1522 1087 378 57 12 .963
34.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 52 1694 1221 408 65 16 .962
25.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1667 1148 450 69 28 .959
17.0 5 Lourdes 47 1449 1019 370 60 24 .959
36.0 6 Concordia (MI) 62 1923 1377 460 86 22 .955
23.0 7 Lawrence Tech 47 1500 1076 355 69 28 .954
27.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1429 1010 350 69 9 .952
29.0 9 Cornerstone 44 1405 971 366 68 29 .952
22.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1410 951 390 69 16 .951
19.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1169 802 296 71 16 .939
19.0 11 Rochester 36 1095 790 236 69 21 .937
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
36.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 36 57 13 .186 0
34.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 34 49 18 .269 0
29.0 3 Cornerstone 44 29 36 12 .250 0
27.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 27 41 11 .212 0
25.0 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 25 72 22 .234 0
23.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 23 66 12 .154 3
22.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 44 22 70 28 .286 1
22.0 7 Siena Heights 51 22 52 19 .268 0
21.0 9 Indiana Tech 53 21 64 18 .220 1
19.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 36 19 41 15 .268 1
19.0 10 Rochester 36 19 45 9 .167 0
17.0 12 Lourdes 47 17 73 8 .099 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
21.0 1 Indiana Tech 13 1,353 105
25.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 14 1,235 89
36.0 3 Concordia (MI) 15 944 63
17.0 4 Lourdes 18 923 52
34.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 27 1,283 48
19.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 13 601 47
19.0 6 Rochester 12 555 47
23.0 8 Lawrence Tech 18 785 44
29.0 9 Cornerstone 12 395 33
22.0 10 Siena Heights 18 455 26
27.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
22.0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 14 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
19.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 655 226 197 101 102 .345 .447 .608
14.0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 691 200 122 86 128 .289 .383 .447
7.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 679 213 161 96 149 .314 .428 .502
16.0 4 Cornerstone 22 664 200 143 95 139 .301 .404 .492
16.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 702 214 177 96 158 .305 .409 .494
13.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 691 204 141 84 123 .295 .388 .482
12.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 672 177 103 81 147 .263 .370 .388
10.0 8 Lourdes 22 666 179 106 70 126 .269 .357 .422
15.0 9 Michigan-Dearborn 22 651 174 73 67 125 .267 .349 .343
15.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 618 154 85 79 150 .249 .362 .354
8.0 11 Siena Heights 22 665 162 88 86 122 .244 .341 .296
12.0 12 Rochester 22 644 163 98 86 179 .253 .353 .356
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
14.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 44 4 19 67
19.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 58 6 34 98
7.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 49 11 19 79
16.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 43 6 26 75
16.0 4 Cornerstone 22 44 7 23 74
13.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 35 8 26 69
12.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 46 7 8 61
10.0 8 Lourdes 22 33 6 19 58
15.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 27 13 4 44
12.0 10 Rochester 22 38 2 8 48
15.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 27 5 4 36
8.0 12 Siena Heights 22 21 4 2 27
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
14.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 145 309 28 12
19.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 207 398 32 11
7.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 182 341 24 11
16.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 199 347 24 4
13.0 5 Lawrence Tech 22 156 333 42 18
12.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 116 261 12 13
16.0 7 Cornerstone 22 157 327 31 6
10.0 8 Lourdes 22 115 281 13 1
15.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 94 219 18 8
8.0 10 Siena Heights 22 96 197 15 7
12.0 11 Rochester 22 111 229 12 11
15.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 22 84 223 8 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
14.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 25 10 18 17 164 191 .86 830
19.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 32 15 4 15 142 182 .78 807
7.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 45 7 23 11 150 169 .89 850
12.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 37 7 4 14 155 174 .89 801
8.0 5 Siena Heights 22 15 5 5 13 176 188 .94 776
13.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 27 9 15 8 164 197 .83 826
16.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 22 34 10 6 12 104 201 .52 848
10.0 8 Lourdes 22 25 6 8 19 175 179 .98 775
16.0 9 Cornerstone 22 26 9 9 12 150 172 .87 803
15.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 35 8 11 14 157 158 .99 751
12.0 11 Rochester 22 17 6 10 4 161 137 1.18 763
15.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 22 18 7 12 18 188 167 1.13 755
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
15.0 1 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 168.0 250 176 154 8.25
12.0 2 Rochester 22 22 164.2 210 172 143 7.82
12.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 168.0 194 173 146 7.82
8.0 4 Siena Heights 22 22 163.2 209 160 143 7.86
16.0 5 Cornerstone 22 22 164.1 190 144 122 6.68
10.0 6 Lourdes 22 22 167.0 200 161 147 7.92
15.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 165.1 196 147 114 6.21
16.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 166.2 163 120 90 4.86
14.0 9 Concordia (MI) 22 22 174.0 184 138 121 6.26
19.0 10 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 167.0 156 91 81 4.37
13.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 22 178.1 159 88 72 3.63
7.0 12 Indiana Tech 22 22 168.0 155 92 71 3.80
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
12.0 1 Rochester 22 22 135 7.38 14 2.00
15.0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 107 5.73 17 1.95
12.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 120 6.43 12 1.88
16.0 4 Cornerstone 22 22 112 6.13 16 1.76
15.0 5 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 108 5.88 9 1.71
8.0 6 Siena Heights 22 22 102 5.61 19 1.71
16.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 155 8.37 13 1.45
14.0 8 Concordia (MI) 22 22 152 7.86 27 1.66
10.0 9 Lourdes 22 22 98 5.28 22 1.64
13.0 10 Lawrence Tech 22 22 198 9.99 16 1.22
7.0 11 Indiana Tech 22 22 184 9.86 19 1.35
19.0 12 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 177 9.54 8 1.32
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
7.0 1 Indiana Tech 22 706 504 175 27 15 .962
8.0 2 Siena Heights 22 695 491 174 30 5 .957
19.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 22 706 501 179 26 9 .963
12.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 724 503 201 20 9 .972
10.0 5 Lourdes 22 724 501 195 28 15 .961
14.0 6 Concordia (MI) 22 710 522 159 29 10 .959
13.0 7 Lawrence Tech 22 746 535 184 27 15 .964
16.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 711 500 176 35 5 .951
16.0 8 Cornerstone 22 703 493 177 33 19 .953
15.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 735 496 203 36 10 .951
15.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 22 733 503 181 49 8 .933
12.0 12 Rochester 22 707 494 173 40 10 .943
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
14.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 14 16 4 .200 0
19.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 19 10 4 .286 0
16.0 3 Cornerstone 22 16 16 4 .200 0
16.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 22 16 15 8 .348 0
12.0 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 12 29 11 .275 0
13.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 13 17 6 .261 0
15.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 22 15 28 18 .391 1
8.0 8 Siena Heights 22 8 19 14 .424 0
7.0 9 Indiana Tech 22 7 18 6 .250 0
15.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 22 15 25 12 .324 1
12.0 11 Rochester 22 12 21 8 .276 0
10.0 12 Lourdes 22 10 45 5 .100 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
7.0 1 Indiana Tech 10 1,087 109
12.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 12 1,114 93
14.0 3 Concordia (MI) 10 731 74
10.0 4 Lourdes 12 722 61
19.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 16 815 51
15.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 12 601 51
12.0 7 Rochester 10 555 56
13.0 8 Lawrence Tech 10 590 59
16.0 9 Cornerstone 10 295 30
8.0 10 Siena Heights 10 310 31
16.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
15.0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 10 0 0