Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Baseball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Rochester 36 1056 263 168 143 313 .249 .355 .368
.368 2 Siena Heights 51 1476 373 199 189 274 .253 .350 .317
.317 3 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1269 336 208 180 293 .265 .379 .380
.380 4 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1079 290 147 105 218 .269 .347 .370
.370 5 Lourdes 47 1383 376 255 185 290 .272 .374 .420
.420 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1588 444 270 185 351 .280 .377 .392
.392 7 Lawrence Tech 47 1412 411 280 196 310 .291 .398 .457
.457 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1403 412 341 207 317 .294 .400 .483
.483 9 Cornerstone 44 1333 395 262 162 341 .296 .388 .476
.476 10 Indiana Tech 53 1643 503 328 215 366 .306 .411 .470
.470 11 Concordia (MI) 62 1888 586 416 252 402 .310 .409 .480
.480 12 Northwestern Ohio 52 1656 543 407 238 304 .328 .427 .533
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Siena Heights 51 54 10 7 71
71 2 Michigan-Dearborn 36 51 14 10 75
75 3 Rochester 36 60 3 20 83
83 4 Cleary (Mich.) 44 60 22 14 96
96 5 Lourdes 47 75 14 34 123
123 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 91 15 19 125
125 7 Cornerstone 44 80 15 43 138
138 8 Lawrence Tech 47 81 18 39 138
138 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 87 11 52 150
150 10 Indiana Tech 53 116 17 40 173
173 11 Northwestern Ohio 52 116 11 67 194
194 12 Concordia (MI) 62 136 13 53 202
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 36 168 399 13 7
7 2 Rochester 36 191 389 39 20
20 3 Siena Heights 51 225 468 31 15
15 4 Cleary (Mich.) 44 232 482 37 15
15 4 Lourdes 47 286 581 42 9
9 6 Cornerstone 44 289 634 58 11
11 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 315 622 58 21
21 8 Lawrence Tech 47 330 645 116 40
40 9 Madonna (Mich.) 43 374 677 39 11
11 10 Indiana Tech 53 384 773 56 24
24 11 Northwestern Ohio 52 439 882 73 19
19 12 Concordia (MI) 62 485 907 120 35
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 36 32 13 13 28 270 256 1.05 1242
1242 2 Rochester 36 35 10 15 4 184 170 1.08 1259
1259 3 Cleary (Mich.) 44 66 19 15 22 288 335 .86 1549
1549 4 Cornerstone 44 47 16 18 21 263 329 .80 1576
1576 5 Lourdes 47 53 19 11 29 334 362 .92 1651
1651 6 Madonna (Mich.) 43 55 18 11 21 224 370 .61 1694
1694 7 Lawrence Tech 47 69 22 18 17 312 363 .86 1717
1717 8 Siena Heights 51 37 10 17 30 376 395 .95 1729
1729 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 75 20 19 32 354 411 .86 1887
1887 10 Indiana Tech 53 90 20 42 31 383 384 1.00 2010
2010 11 Northwestern Ohio 52 70 31 17 30 320 435 .74 2012
2012 12 Concordia (MI) 62 80 25 41 30 387 483 .80 2286
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Indiana Tech 53 53 400.0 414 264 231 5.20
5.20 2 Lawrence Tech 47 47 358.2 367 252 208 5.22
5.22 3 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 407.0 401 272 247 5.46
5.46 4 Concordia (MI) 62 62 459.0 490 343 282 5.53
5.53 5 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 337.2 387 296 235 6.26
6.26 6 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 324.0 363 297 240 6.67
6.67 7 Lourdes 47 47 339.2 400 291 254 6.73
6.73 8 Cornerstone 44 44 323.2 369 309 267 7.42
7.42 9 Siena Heights 51 51 363.2 430 336 304 7.52
7.52 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 383.0 485 396 329 7.73
7.73 11 Rochester 36 36 268.1 348 310 248 8.32
8.32 12 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 268.0 397 298 260 8.73
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 434 9.60 33 1.45
1.45 2 Indiana Tech 53 53 419 9.43 50 1.49
1.49 3 Lawrence Tech 47 47 413 10.36 34 1.52
1.52 4 Lourdes 47 47 240 6.36 32 1.62
1.62 5 Concordia (MI) 62 62 427 8.37 46 1.65
1.65 6 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 331 8.82 25 1.67
1.67 7 Siena Heights 51 51 243 6.01 34 1.67
1.67 7 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 234 6.50 26 1.72
1.72 9 Cornerstone 44 44 230 6.40 32 1.74
1.74 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 307 7.21 25 1.83
1.83 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 167 5.61 25 2.00
2.00 12 Rochester 36 36 237 7.95 23 2.05
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Rochester 36 1095 790 236 69 21 .937
.937 2 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1169 802 296 71 16 .939
.939 3 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1410 951 390 69 16 .951
.951 4 Cornerstone 44 1405 971 366 68 29 .952
.952 5 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1429 1010 350 69 9 .952
.952 5 Lawrence Tech 47 1500 1076 355 69 28 .954
.954 7 Concordia (MI) 62 1923 1377 460 86 22 .955
.955 8 Lourdes 47 1449 1019 370 60 24 .959
.959 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1667 1148 450 69 28 .959
.959 9 Northwestern Ohio 52 1694 1221 408 65 16 .962
.962 11 Siena Heights 51 1522 1087 378 57 12 .963
.963 12 Indiana Tech 53 1682 1200 421 61 20 .964
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Lourdes 47 17 73 8 .099 0
0 2 Lawrence Tech 47 23 66 12 .154 3
3 3 Rochester 36 19 45 9 .167 0
0 4 Concordia (MI) 62 36 57 13 .186 0
0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 27 41 11 .212 0
0 4 Indiana Tech 53 21 64 18 .220 1
1 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 25 72 22 .234 0
0 8 Cornerstone 44 29 36 12 .250 0
0 8 Siena Heights 51 22 52 19 .268 0
0 8 Michigan-Dearborn 36 19 41 15 .268 1
1 11 Northwestern Ohio 52 34 49 18 .269 0
0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 44 22 70 28 .286 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Cleary (Mich.) 14 0 0
0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
18 3 Siena Heights 18 455 26
26 4 Cornerstone 12 395 33
33 5 Lawrence Tech 18 785 44
44 6 Michigan-Dearborn 13 601 47
47 7 Rochester 12 555 47
47 7 Northwestern Ohio 27 1,283 48
48 9 Lourdes 18 923 52
52 10 Concordia (MI) 15 944 63
63 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 14 1,235 89
89 12 Indiana Tech 13 1,353 105
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Rochester 22 644 163 98 86 179 .253 .353 .356
.356 2 Siena Heights 22 665 162 88 86 122 .244 .341 .296
.296 3 Cleary (Mich.) 22 618 154 85 79 150 .249 .362 .354
.354 4 Michigan-Dearborn 22 651 174 73 67 125 .267 .349 .343
.343 5 Lourdes 22 666 179 106 70 126 .269 .357 .422
.422 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 672 177 103 81 147 .263 .370 .388
.388 7 Lawrence Tech 22 691 204 141 84 123 .295 .388 .482
.482 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 702 214 177 96 158 .305 .409 .494
.494 9 Cornerstone 22 664 200 143 95 139 .301 .404 .492
.492 10 Indiana Tech 22 679 213 161 96 149 .314 .428 .502
.502 11 Concordia (MI) 22 691 200 122 86 128 .289 .383 .447
.447 12 Northwestern Ohio 22 655 226 197 101 102 .345 .447 .608
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Siena Heights 22 21 4 2 27
27 2 Michigan-Dearborn 22 27 5 4 36
36 3 Rochester 22 38 2 8 48
48 4 Cleary (Mich.) 22 27 13 4 44
44 5 Lourdes 22 33 6 19 58
58 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 46 7 8 61
61 7 Cornerstone 22 44 7 23 74
74 8 Lawrence Tech 22 35 8 26 69
69 9 Madonna (Mich.) 22 43 6 26 75
75 10 Indiana Tech 22 49 11 19 79
79 11 Northwestern Ohio 22 58 6 34 98
98 12 Concordia (MI) 22 44 4 19 67
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 22 84 223 8 6
6 2 Rochester 22 111 229 12 11
11 3 Siena Heights 22 96 197 15 7
7 4 Cleary (Mich.) 22 94 219 18 8
8 5 Lourdes 22 115 281 13 1
1 6 Cornerstone 22 157 327 31 6
6 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 116 261 12 13
13 8 Lawrence Tech 22 156 333 42 18
18 9 Madonna (Mich.) 22 199 347 24 4
4 10 Indiana Tech 22 182 341 24 11
11 11 Northwestern Ohio 22 207 398 32 11
11 11 Concordia (MI) 22 145 309 28 12
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 22 18 7 12 18 188 167 1.13 755
755 2 Rochester 22 17 6 10 4 161 137 1.18 763
763 3 Cleary (Mich.) 22 35 8 11 14 157 158 .99 751
751 4 Cornerstone 22 26 9 9 12 150 172 .87 803
803 5 Lourdes 22 25 6 8 19 175 179 .98 775
775 6 Madonna (Mich.) 22 34 10 6 12 104 201 .52 848
848 7 Lawrence Tech 22 27 9 15 8 164 197 .83 826
826 8 Siena Heights 22 15 5 5 13 176 188 .94 776
776 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 37 7 4 14 155 174 .89 801
801 10 Indiana Tech 22 45 7 23 11 150 169 .89 850
850 11 Northwestern Ohio 22 32 15 4 15 142 182 .78 807
807 12 Concordia (MI) 22 25 10 18 17 164 191 .86 830
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Indiana Tech 22 22 168.0 155 92 71 3.80
3.80 2 Lawrence Tech 22 22 178.1 159 88 72 3.63
3.63 3 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 167.0 156 91 81 4.37
4.37 4 Concordia (MI) 22 22 174.0 184 138 121 6.26
6.26 5 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 166.2 163 120 90 4.86
4.86 6 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 165.1 196 147 114 6.21
6.21 7 Lourdes 22 22 167.0 200 161 147 7.92
7.92 8 Cornerstone 22 22 164.1 190 144 122 6.68
6.68 9 Siena Heights 22 22 163.2 209 160 143 7.86
7.86 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 168.0 194 173 146 7.82
7.82 11 Rochester 22 22 164.2 210 172 143 7.82
7.82 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 168.0 250 176 154 8.25
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 177 9.54 8 1.32
1.32 2 Indiana Tech 22 22 184 9.86 19 1.35
1.35 3 Lawrence Tech 22 22 198 9.99 16 1.22
1.22 4 Lourdes 22 22 98 5.28 22 1.64
1.64 5 Concordia (MI) 22 22 152 7.86 27 1.66
1.66 6 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 155 8.37 13 1.45
1.45 7 Siena Heights 22 22 102 5.61 19 1.71
1.71 8 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 108 5.88 9 1.71
1.71 8 Cornerstone 22 22 112 6.13 16 1.76
1.76 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 120 6.43 12 1.88
1.88 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 107 5.73 17 1.95
1.95 12 Rochester 22 22 135 7.38 14 2.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Rochester 22 707 494 173 40 10 .943
.943 2 Michigan-Dearborn 22 733 503 181 49 8 .933
.933 3 Cleary (Mich.) 22 735 496 203 36 10 .951
.951 4 Cornerstone 22 703 493 177 33 19 .953
.953 5 Madonna (Mich.) 22 711 500 176 35 5 .951
.951 6 Lawrence Tech 22 746 535 184 27 15 .964
.964 7 Concordia (MI) 22 710 522 159 29 10 .959
.959 8 Lourdes 22 724 501 195 28 15 .961
.961 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 724 503 201 20 9 .972
.972 10 Northwestern Ohio 22 706 501 179 26 9 .963
.963 11 Siena Heights 22 695 491 174 30 5 .957
.957 12 Indiana Tech 22 706 504 175 27 15 .962
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Lourdes 22 10 45 5 .100 0
0 2 Lawrence Tech 22 13 17 6 .261 0
0 2 Rochester 22 12 21 8 .276 0
0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 14 16 4 .200 0
0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 22 16 15 8 .348 0
0 2 Indiana Tech 22 7 18 6 .250 0
0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 12 29 11 .275 0
0 2 Cornerstone 22 16 16 4 .200 0
0 2 Siena Heights 22 8 19 14 .424 0
0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 22 15 25 12 .324 1
1 11 Northwestern Ohio 22 19 10 4 .286 0
0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 22 15 28 18 .391 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Cleary (Mich.) 10 0 0
0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
18 3 Siena Heights 10 310 31
31 4 Cornerstone 10 295 30
30 5 Lawrence Tech 10 590 59
59 6 Michigan-Dearborn 12 601 51
51 7 Rochester 10 555 56
56 8 Northwestern Ohio 16 815 51
51 9 Lourdes 12 722 61
61 10 Concordia (MI) 10 731 74
74 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 12 1,114 93
93 12 Indiana Tech 10 1,087 109