Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Softball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
38.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 40 1099 360 194 61 165 .328 .363 .524
45.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 1450 473 307 206 242 .326 .411 .501
7.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 40 1023 331 215 155 142 .324 .416 .431
24.0 4 Concordia (MI) 50 1352 420 213 106 119 .311 .369 .440
17.0 5 Indiana Tech 48 1275 393 225 114 210 .308 .379 .433
12.0 6 Lourdes 37 980 288 149 76 145 .294 .351 .410
32.0 7 Michigan-Dearborn 43 1123 327 190 115 211 .291 .361 .443
20.0 8 Siena Heights 41 1096 317 166 94 148 .289 .346 .394
14.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 50 1327 377 183 94 186 .284 .338 .376
25.0 10 Cornerstone 38 1023 285 174 100 204 .279 .347 .438
12.0 11 Lawrence Tech 44 1136 309 154 92 217 .272 .335 .359
3.0 12 Rochester 26 591 127 34 42 128 .215 .271 .283
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
45.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 100 9 45 154
38.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 40 84 9 38 131
32.0 3 Michigan-Dearborn 43 59 8 32 99
25.0 4 Cornerstone 38 46 21 25 92
24.0 5 Concordia (MI) 50 71 16 24 111
20.0 6 Siena Heights 41 47 4 20 71
17.0 7 Indiana Tech 48 76 16 17 109
14.0 8 Cleary (Mich.) 50 64 8 14 86
12.0 9 Lawrence Tech 44 47 8 12 67
12.0 9 Lourdes 37 64 7 12 83
7.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 40 55 17 7 79
3.0 12 Rochester 26 23 4 3 30
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
45.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 351 726 140 26
24.0 2 Concordia (MI) 50 266 595 103 18
17.0 3 Indiana Tech 48 252 552 84 18
7.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 40 247 441 109 10
38.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 40 220 576 41 5
32.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 43 220 498 59 14
14.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 50 210 499 63 15
25.0 8 Cornerstone 38 189 448 56 6
20.0 9 Siena Heights 41 183 432 68 13
12.0 10 Lawrence Tech 44 173 408 49 16
12.0 10 Lourdes 37 166 402 45 13
3.0 12 Rochester 26 44 167 8 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
45.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 16 19 9 13 304 408 .75 1700
24.0 2 Concordia (MI) 50 23 8 57 14 428 371 1.15 1546
17.0 3 Indiana Tech 48 44 19 53 16 350 320 1.09 1505
14.0 4 Cleary (Mich.) 50 20 13 18 11 331 262 1.26 1472
32.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 43 15 12 38 12 225 323 .70 1303
12.0 6 Lawrence Tech 44 17 3 46 9 334 250 1.34 1294
20.0 7 Siena Heights 41 4 6 35 11 285 342 .83 1235
7.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 40 11 6 31 5 264 223 1.18 1226
38.0 9 Northwestern Ohio 40 8 14 19 3 223 327 .68 1201
25.0 10 Cornerstone 38 12 9 21 11 286 244 1.17 1165
12.0 11 Lourdes 37 16 11 14 12 266 276 .96 1097
3.0 12 Rochester 26 4 1 8 3 181 125 1.45 646
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
3.0 1 Rochester 26 26 144.2 302 225 181 8.76
14.0 2 Cleary (Mich.) 50 50 311.0 484 333 270 6.08
12.0 3 Lawrence Tech 44 44 278.1 371 286 225 5.66
25.0 4 Cornerstone 38 38 247.2 360 206 172 4.86
12.0 5 Lourdes 37 37 241.1 307 200 153 4.44
38.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 40 40 247.1 269 195 150 4.25
24.0 7 Concordia (MI) 50 50 324.0 387 235 194 4.19
17.0 8 Indiana Tech 48 48 314.1 347 214 180 4.01
20.0 9 Siena Heights 41 41 271.2 294 188 126 3.25
45.0 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 53 348.0 401 191 141 2.84
32.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 43 43 284.1 283 135 99 2.44
7.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 40 40 254.2 188 85 66 1.81
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.0 1 Rochester 26 26 48 2.32 17 2.47
12.0 2 Lawrence Tech 44 44 162 4.07 28 1.98
14.0 3 Cleary (Mich.) 50 50 137 3.08 35 1.90
25.0 4 Cornerstone 38 38 126 3.56 23 1.86
12.0 5 Lourdes 37 37 184 5.34 13 1.69
38.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 40 40 204 5.77 19 1.64
24.0 7 Concordia (MI) 50 50 183 3.95 24 1.63
17.0 8 Indiana Tech 48 48 166 3.70 19 1.57
45.0 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 53 216 4.34 20 1.42
32.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 43 43 227 5.59 12 1.37
20.0 11 Siena Heights 41 41 223 5.75 16 1.31
7.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 40 40 303 8.33 12 0.90
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
24.0 1 Concordia (MI) 50 1445 972 420 53 26 .963
7.0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 40 963 754 171 38 6 .961
25.0 3 Cornerstone 38 1071 743 282 46 14 .957
32.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 43 1169 848 268 53 18 .955
17.0 5 Indiana Tech 48 1361 943 356 62 10 .954
45.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 1553 1044 436 73 3 .953
38.0 7 Northwestern Ohio 40 1038 742 243 53 19 .949
12.0 8 Lourdes 37 1104 724 313 67 10 .939
3.0 9 Rochester 26 637 401 195 41 11 .936
14.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 50 1367 933 341 93 11 .932
12.0 11 Lawrence Tech 44 1227 817 318 92 17 .925
20.0 12 Siena Heights 41 1203 815 295 93 13 .923
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
14.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 50 13 69 16 .188 0
45.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 15 41 9 .180 0
12.0 3 Lourdes 37 10 67 11 .141 0
32.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 43 11 56 9 .138 0
20.0 5 Siena Heights 41 9 56 9 .138 0
38.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 40 7 69 11 .138 0
12.0 7 Lawrence Tech 44 11 74 11 .129 0
24.0 8 Concordia (MI) 50 12 69 10 .127 0
7.0 9 Madonna (Mich.) 40 2 36 4 .100 0
3.0 10 Rochester 26 4 72 7 .089 0
17.0 11 Indiana Tech 48 9 72 6 .077 1
25.0 12 Cornerstone 38 7 59 4 .063 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
45.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 14.0 1,500 108
17.0 2 Indiana Tech 23.0 1,630 71
38.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 12.0 816 68
32.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 13.0 710 55
12.0 5 Lourdes 20.0 1,097 55
3.0 6 Rochester 8.0 349 44
12.0 7 Lawrence Tech 14.0 540 39
24.0 8 Concordia (MI) 15.0 467 32
20.0 9 Siena Heights 18.0 570 32
7.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 18.0 450 25
14.0 11 Cleary (Mich.) 10.0 90 9
25.0 12 Cornerstone 13.0 100 8
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
24.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 621 220 131 30 90 .354 .378 .576
18.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 592 188 121 96 99 .318 .415 .481
4.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 22 565 193 127 86 76 .342 .432 .444
14.0 4 Concordia (MI) 22 592 176 87 40 62 .297 .348 .431
10.0 5 Indiana Tech 22 580 201 138 61 87 .347 .420 .493
6.0 6 Lourdes 22 595 178 87 38 96 .299 .346 .424
18.0 7 Michigan-Dearborn 22 581 190 120 72 103 .327 .404 .511
11.0 8 Siena Heights 22 566 148 78 49 90 .261 .321 .369
5.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 573 157 76 33 86 .274 .320 .372
17.0 10 Cornerstone 22 605 180 114 64 104 .298 .369 .486
10.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 583 178 105 55 97 .305 .375 .437
3.0 12 Rochester 22 500 103 28 36 116 .206 .264 .272
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
18.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 33 5 18 56
24.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 54 6 24 84
18.0 3 Michigan-Dearborn 22 41 6 18 65
17.0 4 Cornerstone 22 29 17 17 63
14.0 5 Concordia (MI) 22 31 3 14 48
11.0 6 Siena Heights 22 26 1 11 38
10.0 7 Indiana Tech 22 39 8 10 57
5.0 8 Cleary (Mich.) 22 31 5 5 41
10.0 9 Lawrence Tech 22 33 7 10 50
6.0 10 Lourdes 22 44 6 6 56
4.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 22 32 7 4 43
3.0 12 Rochester 22 18 3 3 24
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
18.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 140 285 70 10
14.0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 107 255 38 6
10.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 149 286 41 6
4.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 142 251 61 4
24.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 22 151 358 28 2
18.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 22 138 297 42 7
5.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 22 91 213 30 5
17.0 8 Cornerstone 22 124 294 24 3
11.0 9 Siena Heights 22 83 209 27 6
10.0 10 Lawrence Tech 22 117 255 31 7
6.0 11 Lourdes 22 96 252 17 7
3.0 12 Rochester 22 32 136 8 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
18.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 9 9 4 2 132 164 .80 710
14.0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 8 3 31 3 172 180 .96 674
10.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 23 14 28 4 150 145 1.03 706
5.0 4 Cleary (Mich.) 22 9 6 7 4 171 145 1.18 628
18.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 22 9 8 19 7 118 169 .70 689
10.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 11 2 24 5 168 130 1.29 675
11.0 7 Siena Heights 22 2 3 21 6 138 189 .73 641
4.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 6 3 19 1 142 151 .94 679
24.0 9 Northwestern Ohio 22 2 14 13 1 126 177 .71 680
17.0 10 Cornerstone 22 8 6 12 8 162 151 1.07 695
6.0 11 Lourdes 22 8 7 8 9 148 171 .87 656
3.0 12 Rochester 22 4 1 7 3 155 118 1.31 548
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
3.0 1 Rochester 22 22 123.2 251 195 157 8.89
5.0 2 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 131.0 238 178 138 7.37
10.0 3 Lawrence Tech 22 22 138.0 178 136 110 5.58
17.0 4 Cornerstone 22 22 142.2 201 118 100 4.91
6.0 5 Lourdes 22 22 145.1 168 112 93 4.48
24.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 138.2 145 94 68 3.43
14.0 7 Concordia (MI) 22 22 141.1 207 144 125 6.19
10.0 8 Indiana Tech 22 22 142.0 156 84 75 3.70
11.0 9 Siena Heights 22 22 144.0 162 105 69 3.35
18.0 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 141.2 166 84 56 2.77
18.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 142.0 143 71 53 2.61
4.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 136.0 97 45 37 1.90
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.0 1 Rochester 22 22 38 2.15 17 2.47
10.0 2 Lawrence Tech 22 22 89 4.51 17 1.96
5.0 3 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 54 2.89 21 2.24
17.0 4 Cornerstone 22 22 63 3.09 12 1.77
6.0 5 Lourdes 22 22 103 4.96 8 1.60
24.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 110 5.55 8 1.59
14.0 7 Concordia (MI) 22 22 80 3.96 17 1.97
10.0 8 Indiana Tech 22 22 70 3.45 11 1.45
18.0 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 96 4.74 9 1.39
18.0 9 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 129 6.36 6 1.39
11.0 11 Siena Heights 22 22 110 5.35 5 1.39
4.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 164 8.44 9 0.88
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
14.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 623 424 173 26 12 .958
4.0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 22 519 408 93 18 4 .965
17.0 3 Cornerstone 22 619 428 166 25 2 .960
18.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 22 572 422 127 23 13 .960
10.0 5 Indiana Tech 22 607 426 162 19 2 .969
18.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 624 425 168 31 1 .950
24.0 7 Northwestern Ohio 22 580 416 135 29 12 .950
6.0 8 Lourdes 22 673 436 203 34 4 .949
3.0 9 Rochester 22 590 371 182 37 11 .937
5.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 580 393 145 42 5 .928
10.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 620 413 162 45 3 .927
11.0 12 Siena Heights 22 650 432 165 53 8 .918
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
5.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 22 8 31 7 .184 0
18.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 3 15 4 .211 0
6.0 3 Lourdes 22 7 37 7 .159 0
18.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 22 7 31 3 .088 0
11.0 5 Siena Heights 22 5 42 6 .125 0
24.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 3 43 9 .173 0
10.0 7 Lawrence Tech 22 3 42 4 .087 0
14.0 8 Concordia (MI) 22 5 30 6 .167 0
4.0 9 Madonna (Mich.) 22 1 18 3 .143 0
3.0 10 Rochester 22 3 68 7 .093 0
10.0 11 Indiana Tech 22 4 27 1 .036 0
17.0 12 Cornerstone 22 4 33 4 .108 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
18.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 12.0 1,276 107
10.0 2 Indiana Tech 12.0 684 57
24.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 12.0 816 68
18.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 12.0 710 60
6.0 5 Lourdes 14.0 863 62
3.0 6 Rochester 8.0 349 44
10.0 7 Lawrence Tech 10.0 460 46
14.0 8 Concordia (MI) 12.0 386 33
11.0 9 Siena Heights 10.0 345 35
4.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 12.0 450 38
5.0 11 Cleary (Mich.) 8.0 90 12
17.0 12 Cornerstone 10.0 45 5