Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Softball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
3.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 40 1099 360 194 61 165 .328 .363 .524
13.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 1450 473 307 206 242 .326 .411 .501
5.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 40 1023 331 215 155 142 .324 .416 .431
14.0 4 Concordia (MI) 50 1352 420 213 106 119 .311 .369 .440
16.0 5 Indiana Tech 48 1275 393 225 114 210 .308 .379 .433
12.0 6 Lourdes 37 980 288 149 76 145 .294 .351 .410
12.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 43 1123 327 190 115 211 .291 .361 .443
11.0 8 Siena Heights 41 1096 317 166 94 148 .289 .346 .394
11.0 8 Cleary (Mich.) 50 1327 377 183 94 186 .284 .338 .376
11.0 8 Cornerstone 38 1023 285 174 100 204 .279 .347 .438
9.0 11 Lawrence Tech 44 1136 309 154 92 217 .272 .335 .359
3.0 12 Rochester 26 591 127 34 42 128 .215 .271 .283
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
13.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 100 9 45 154
3.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 40 84 9 38 131
14.0 3 Concordia (MI) 50 71 16 24 111
16.0 4 Indiana Tech 48 76 16 17 109
12.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 43 59 8 32 99
11.0 6 Cornerstone 38 46 21 25 92
11.0 6 Cleary (Mich.) 50 64 8 14 86
12.0 8 Lourdes 37 64 7 12 83
5.0 9 Madonna (Mich.) 40 55 17 7 79
11.0 10 Siena Heights 41 47 4 20 71
9.0 11 Lawrence Tech 44 47 8 12 67
3.0 12 Rochester 26 23 4 3 30
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
13.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 351 726 140 26
14.0 2 Concordia (MI) 50 266 595 103 18
16.0 3 Indiana Tech 48 252 552 84 18
5.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 40 247 441 109 10
12.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 43 220 498 59 14
3.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 40 220 576 41 5
11.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 50 210 499 63 15
11.0 7 Cornerstone 38 189 448 56 6
11.0 7 Siena Heights 41 183 432 68 13
9.0 10 Lawrence Tech 44 173 408 49 16
12.0 11 Lourdes 37 166 402 45 13
3.0 12 Rochester 26 44 167 8 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
16.0 1 Indiana Tech 48 44 19 53 16 350 320 1.09 1505
14.0 2 Concordia (MI) 50 23 8 57 14 428 371 1.15 1546
13.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 16 19 9 13 304 408 .75 1700
12.0 4 Lourdes 37 16 11 14 12 266 276 .96 1097
12.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 43 15 12 38 12 225 323 .70 1303
11.0 6 Cleary (Mich.) 50 20 13 18 11 331 262 1.26 1472
11.0 6 Cornerstone 38 12 9 21 11 286 244 1.17 1165
11.0 6 Siena Heights 41 4 6 35 11 285 342 .83 1235
9.0 9 Lawrence Tech 44 17 3 46 9 334 250 1.34 1294
5.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 40 11 6 31 5 264 223 1.18 1226
3.0 11 Northwestern Ohio 40 8 14 19 3 223 327 .68 1201
3.0 11 Rochester 26 4 1 8 3 181 125 1.45 646
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
3.0 1 Rochester 26 26 144.2 302 225 181 8.76
11.0 2 Cleary (Mich.) 50 50 311.0 484 333 270 6.08
9.0 3 Lawrence Tech 44 44 278.1 371 286 225 5.66
11.0 4 Cornerstone 38 38 247.2 360 206 172 4.86
12.0 5 Lourdes 37 37 241.1 307 200 153 4.44
3.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 40 40 247.1 269 195 150 4.25
14.0 7 Concordia (MI) 50 50 324.0 387 235 194 4.19
16.0 8 Indiana Tech 48 48 314.1 347 214 180 4.01
11.0 9 Siena Heights 41 41 271.2 294 188 126 3.25
13.0 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 53 348.0 401 191 141 2.84
12.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 43 43 284.1 283 135 99 2.44
5.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 40 40 254.2 188 85 66 1.81
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.0 1 Rochester 26 26 48 2.32 17 2.47
9.0 2 Lawrence Tech 44 44 162 4.07 28 1.98
11.0 3 Cleary (Mich.) 50 50 137 3.08 35 1.90
11.0 3 Cornerstone 38 38 126 3.56 23 1.86
12.0 5 Lourdes 37 37 184 5.34 13 1.69
3.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 40 40 204 5.77 19 1.64
14.0 7 Concordia (MI) 50 50 183 3.95 24 1.63
16.0 8 Indiana Tech 48 48 166 3.70 19 1.57
13.0 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 53 216 4.34 20 1.42
12.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 43 43 227 5.59 12 1.37
11.0 11 Siena Heights 41 41 223 5.75 16 1.31
5.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 40 40 303 8.33 12 0.90
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
14.0 1 Concordia (MI) 50 1445 972 420 53 26 .963
5.0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 40 963 754 171 38 6 .961
11.0 3 Cornerstone 38 1071 743 282 46 14 .957
12.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 43 1169 848 268 53 18 .955
16.0 5 Indiana Tech 48 1361 943 356 62 10 .954
13.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 1553 1044 436 73 3 .953
3.0 7 Northwestern Ohio 40 1038 742 243 53 19 .949
12.0 8 Lourdes 37 1104 724 313 67 10 .939
3.0 9 Rochester 26 637 401 195 41 11 .936
11.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 50 1367 933 341 93 11 .932
9.0 11 Lawrence Tech 44 1227 817 318 92 17 .925
11.0 12 Siena Heights 41 1203 815 295 93 13 .923
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
11.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 50 13 69 16 .188 0
13.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 15 41 9 .180 0
12.0 3 Lourdes 37 10 67 11 .141 0
12.0 3 Michigan-Dearborn 43 11 56 9 .138 0
11.0 5 Siena Heights 41 9 56 9 .138 0
3.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 40 7 69 11 .138 0
9.0 7 Lawrence Tech 44 11 74 11 .129 0
14.0 8 Concordia (MI) 50 12 69 10 .127 0
5.0 9 Madonna (Mich.) 40 2 36 4 .100 0
3.0 10 Rochester 26 4 72 7 .089 0
16.0 11 Indiana Tech 48 9 72 6 .077 1
11.0 12 Cornerstone 38 7 59 4 .063 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
13.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 14.0 1,500 108
16.0 2 Indiana Tech 23.0 1,630 71
3.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 12.0 816 68
12.0 4 Lourdes 20.0 1,097 55
12.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 13.0 710 55
3.0 6 Rochester 8.0 349 44
9.0 7 Lawrence Tech 14.0 540 39
14.0 8 Concordia (MI) 15.0 467 32
11.0 9 Siena Heights 18.0 570 32
5.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 18.0 450 25
11.0 11 Cleary (Mich.) 10.0 90 9
11.0 11 Cornerstone 13.0 100 8
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
1.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 621 220 131 30 90 .354 .378 .576
2.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 592 188 121 96 99 .318 .415 .481
1.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 22 565 193 127 86 76 .342 .432 .444
3.0 4 Concordia (MI) 22 592 176 87 40 62 .297 .348 .431
4.0 5 Indiana Tech 22 580 201 138 61 87 .347 .420 .493
9.0 6 Lourdes 22 595 178 87 38 96 .299 .346 .424
7.0 7 Michigan-Dearborn 22 581 190 120 72 103 .327 .404 .511
6.0 8 Siena Heights 22 566 148 78 49 90 .261 .321 .369
4.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 573 157 76 33 86 .274 .320 .372
8.0 10 Cornerstone 22 605 180 114 64 104 .298 .369 .486
5.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 583 178 105 55 97 .305 .375 .437
3.0 12 Rochester 22 500 103 28 36 116 .206 .264 .272
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
2.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 33 5 18 56
1.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 54 6 24 84
3.0 3 Concordia (MI) 22 31 3 14 48
4.0 4 Indiana Tech 22 39 8 10 57
7.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 22 41 6 18 65
8.0 6 Cornerstone 22 29 17 17 63
4.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 22 31 5 5 41
9.0 8 Lourdes 22 44 6 6 56
1.0 9 Madonna (Mich.) 22 32 7 4 43
6.0 10 Siena Heights 22 26 1 11 38
5.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 33 7 10 50
3.0 12 Rochester 22 18 3 3 24
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
2.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 140 285 70 10
3.0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 107 255 38 6
4.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 149 286 41 6
1.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 142 251 61 4
7.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 22 138 297 42 7
1.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 151 358 28 2
4.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 22 91 213 30 5
8.0 8 Cornerstone 22 124 294 24 3
6.0 9 Siena Heights 22 83 209 27 6
5.0 10 Lawrence Tech 22 117 255 31 7
9.0 11 Lourdes 22 96 252 17 7
3.0 12 Rochester 22 32 136 8 3
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
4.0 1 Indiana Tech 22 23 14 28 4 150 145 1.03 706
3.0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 8 3 31 3 172 180 .96 674
2.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 9 9 4 2 132 164 .80 710
9.0 4 Lourdes 22 8 7 8 9 148 171 .87 656
7.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 22 9 8 19 7 118 169 .70 689
4.0 6 Cleary (Mich.) 22 9 6 7 4 171 145 1.18 628
8.0 7 Cornerstone 22 8 6 12 8 162 151 1.07 695
6.0 8 Siena Heights 22 2 3 21 6 138 189 .73 641
5.0 9 Lawrence Tech 22 11 2 24 5 168 130 1.29 675
1.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 22 6 3 19 1 142 151 .94 679
1.0 10 Northwestern Ohio 22 2 14 13 1 126 177 .71 680
3.0 12 Rochester 22 4 1 7 3 155 118 1.31 548
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
3.0 1 Rochester 22 22 123.2 251 195 157 8.89
4.0 2 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 131.0 238 178 138 7.37
5.0 3 Lawrence Tech 22 22 138.0 178 136 110 5.58
8.0 4 Cornerstone 22 22 142.2 201 118 100 4.91
9.0 5 Lourdes 22 22 145.1 168 112 93 4.48
1.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 138.2 145 94 68 3.43
3.0 7 Concordia (MI) 22 22 141.1 207 144 125 6.19
4.0 8 Indiana Tech 22 22 142.0 156 84 75 3.70
6.0 9 Siena Heights 22 22 144.0 162 105 69 3.35
2.0 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 141.2 166 84 56 2.77
7.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 142.0 143 71 53 2.61
1.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 136.0 97 45 37 1.90
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.0 1 Rochester 22 22 38 2.15 17 2.47
5.0 2 Lawrence Tech 22 22 89 4.51 17 1.96
4.0 3 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 54 2.89 21 2.24
8.0 4 Cornerstone 22 22 63 3.09 12 1.77
9.0 5 Lourdes 22 22 103 4.96 8 1.60
1.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 110 5.55 8 1.59
3.0 7 Concordia (MI) 22 22 80 3.96 17 1.97
4.0 8 Indiana Tech 22 22 70 3.45 11 1.45
2.0 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 96 4.74 9 1.39
7.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 129 6.36 6 1.39
6.0 11 Siena Heights 22 22 110 5.35 5 1.39
1.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 164 8.44 9 0.88
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
3.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 623 424 173 26 12 .958
1.0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 22 519 408 93 18 4 .965
8.0 3 Cornerstone 22 619 428 166 25 2 .960
7.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 22 572 422 127 23 13 .960
4.0 5 Indiana Tech 22 607 426 162 19 2 .969
2.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 624 425 168 31 1 .950
1.0 7 Northwestern Ohio 22 580 416 135 29 12 .950
9.0 8 Lourdes 22 673 436 203 34 4 .949
3.0 9 Rochester 22 590 371 182 37 11 .937
4.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 580 393 145 42 5 .928
5.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 620 413 162 45 3 .927
6.0 12 Siena Heights 22 650 432 165 53 8 .918
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
4.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 22 8 31 7 .184 0
2.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 3 15 4 .211 0
9.0 3 Lourdes 22 7 37 7 .159 0
7.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 22 7 31 3 .088 0
6.0 5 Siena Heights 22 5 42 6 .125 0
1.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 3 43 9 .173 0
5.0 7 Lawrence Tech 22 3 42 4 .087 0
3.0 8 Concordia (MI) 22 5 30 6 .167 0
1.0 9 Madonna (Mich.) 22 1 18 3 .143 0
3.0 10 Rochester 22 3 68 7 .093 0
4.0 11 Indiana Tech 22 4 27 1 .036 0
8.0 12 Cornerstone 22 4 33 4 .108 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
2.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 12.0 1,276 107
4.0 2 Indiana Tech 12.0 684 57
1.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 12.0 816 68
9.0 4 Lourdes 14.0 863 62
7.0 5 Michigan-Dearborn 12.0 710 60
3.0 6 Rochester 8.0 349 44
5.0 7 Lawrence Tech 10.0 460 46
3.0 8 Concordia (MI) 12.0 386 33
6.0 9 Siena Heights 10.0 345 35
1.0 10 Madonna (Mich.) 12.0 450 38
4.0 11 Cleary (Mich.) 8.0 90 12
8.0 12 Cornerstone 10.0 45 5