Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2023 Mid-South Conference Football Team Stats

Rk Team gp td fg xpt 2pc dxp saf pts ppg
41.92307692307692 1 Bethel (TN) 13 73 11 64 1 - - 545 41.9
36.4 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 52 3 35 6 - - 364 36.4
34.583333333333336 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 55 8 55 - - - 415 34.6
28.4 4 Campbellsville (KY) 10 40 2 32 - - - 284 28.4
23.7 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 28 11 28 - - - 237 23.7
20.1 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 28 3 22 - - - 201 20.1
10.2 7 Faulkner (AL) 10 11 8 10 - 1 - 102 10.2
Rk Team gp rush pass tot off ypg
437.3076923076923 1 Bethel (TN) 13 2098 3587 5697 437.3
385.1 2 Campbellsville (KY) 10 566 3285 3851 385.1
356.1666666666667 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 2374 1900 4274 356.2
353.4 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 1465 2069 3534 353.4
312.6 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 2319 807 3126 312.6
288.4 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 1497 1387 2884 288.4
153.2 7 Faulkner (AL) 10 404 1128 1532 153.2
Rk Team gp yds comp-att-int yds/g yds/att yds/comp td
328.5 1 Campbellsville (KY) 10 3285 266-409-15 328.5 8.0 12.3 30
275.9230769230769 2 Bethel (TN) 13 3587 250-368-11 275.9 9.7 14.3 40
206.9 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 2069 161-295-11 206.9 7.0 12.9 17
158.33333333333334 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 1900 147-246-13 158.3 7.7 12.9 17
138.7 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 1387 106-242-11 138.7 5.7 13.1 10
112.8 6 Faulkner (AL) 10 1128 92-214-11 112.8 5.3 12.3 7
80.7 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 807 75-166-12 80.7 4.9 10.8 3
Rk Team gp yds att yds/g avg td
231.9 1 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 2319 493 231.9 4.7 24
197.83333333333334 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 2374 473 197.8 5.0 30
161.3846153846154 3 Bethel (TN) 13 2098 417 161.4 5.0 26
149.7 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 1497 413 149.7 3.6 15
146.5 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 1465 346 146.5 4.2 21
56.6 6 Campbellsville (KY) 10 566 228 56.6 2.5 9
40.4 7 Faulkner (AL) 10 404 335 40.4 1.2 2
Rk Team gp total rush pass pen 1st/g
23.23076923076923 1 Bethel (TN) 13 302 124 164 14 23.2
21.4 2 Campbellsville (KY) 10 214 38 156 20 21.4
20.833333333333332 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 250 141 86 23 20.8
18.7 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 187 145 33 9 18.7
18.5 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 185 87 92 6 18.5
17.4 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 174 89 63 21 17.4
9.4 7 Faulkner (AL) 10 94 39 43 12 9.4
Rk Team gp 3rd made 3rd % 4th made 4th %
0.4755244755244755 1 Bethel (TN) 13 68-143 48% 5-14 36%
0.40310077519379844 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 52-129 40% 10-20 50%
0.38461538461538464 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 55-143 38% 10-22 45%
0.37735849056603776 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 60-159 38% 8-18 44%
0.3359375 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 43-128 34% 14-32 44%
0.32432432432432434 6 Campbellsville (KY) 10 36-111 32% 8-24 33%
0.27702702702702703 7 Faulkner (AL) 10 41-148 28% 2-11 18%
Rk Team gp kr ko avg pr avg
27.0 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 32-864 27.0 15-188 12.5
23.77777777777778 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 27-642 23.8 22-327 14.9
20.25 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 32-648 20.3 15-171 11.4
18.896551724137932 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 29-548 18.9 19-133 7.0
17.90909090909091 5 Campbellsville (KY) 10 33-591 17.9 17-90 5.3
15.741935483870968 6 Faulkner (AL) 10 31-488 15.7 12-107 8.9
14.0 7 Bethel (TN) 13 38-532 14.0 28-419 15.0
Rk Team gp fg fg % pat pat % punts avg kickoffs avg
0.8 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 8-10 80.0% 55-56 98.2% 41-1592 38.8 76-4063 53.5
0.7272727272727273 2 Faulkner (AL) 10 8-11 72.7% 10-10 100.0% 80-2915 36.4 28-1310 46.8
0.6875 3 Bethel (TN) 13 11-16 68.8% 64-72 88.9% 37-1403 37.9 98-5313 54.2
0.6470588235294118 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 11-17 64.7% 28-29 96.6% 56-2157 38.5 50-2857 57.1
0.5 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 3-6 50.0% 22-27 81.5% 54-1524 28.2 40-1570 39.3
0.42857142857142855 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 3-7 42.9% 35-41 85.4% 45-1716 38.1 63-3661 58.1
0.3333333333333333 7 Campbellsville (KY) 10 2-6 33.3% 32-38 84.2% 37-1288 34.8 54-3171 58.7
Rk Team gp scores rz % td td %
0.8571428571428571 1 Bethel (TN) 13 54-63 86% 45-63 71%
0.8181818181818182 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 36-44 82% 30-44 68%
0.8055555555555556 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 29-36 81% 19-36 53%
0.7692307692307693 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 30-39 77% 29-39 74%
0.7142857142857143 5 Campbellsville (KY) 10 30-42 71% 28-42 67%
0.6756756756756757 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 25-37 68% 22-37 59%
0.5 7 Faulkner (AL) 10 7-14 50% 3-14 21%
Rk Team gp fum-lost fum rec int int yds int avg td tkl sack
14.0 1 Bethel (TN) 13 13-8 14 21 21-431 20.5 5 811 41
13.0 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 9-5 13 21 21-287 13.7 6 704 22
11.0 3 Faulkner (AL) 10 11-6 11 14 14-131 9.4 1 694 17
10.0 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 10-4 10 16 16-110 6.9 2 599 25
9.0 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 13-3 9 10 10-148 14.8 6 559 28
8.0 6 Campbellsville (KY) 10 26-19 8 11 11-117 10.6 1 673 28
8.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 12-7 8 10 10-45 4.5 0 586 26
Rk Team gp pen pen/g pen yards pen yards/g
101.0 1 Bethel (TN) 13 101 7.8 970 74.6
81.0 2 Campbellsville (KY) 10 81 8.1 782 78.2
74.0 3 Faulkner (AL) 10 74 7.4 636 63.6
59.0 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 59 5.9 522 52.2
55.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 55 5.5 485 48.5
55.0 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 55 5.5 485 48.5
47.0 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 47 3.9 533 44.4
Rk Team gp ppg pts yd/g pass y/g rush y/g tkl/g int fum rec sack td
15.333333333333334 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 15.3 184 265.8 173.8 91.9 58.7 21 8 22 6
16.0 2 Bethel (TN) 13 16.0 208 231.8 143.3 88.5 62.4 21 11 41 5
17.4 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 17.4 174 277.7 202.6 75.1 55.9 10 9 28 6
22.1 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 22.1 221 327.3 182.2 145.1 59.9 16 7 25 2
22.6 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 22.6 226 279.8 191.5 88.3 58.6 10 8 26 0
25.7 6 Campbellsville (KY) 10 25.7 257 323.5 169.4 154.1 67.3 11 9 28 1
31.5 7 Faulkner (AL) 10 31.5 315 350.6 204.2 146.4 69.4 14 5 17 1
Rk Team gp top attend avg
32:05 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 32:05 0 0
31:20 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 31:20 9,350 1,336
31:19 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 31:19 3,124 625
30:37 4 Bethel (TN) 13 30:37 4,000 500
30:10 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 30:10 7,122 1,425
29:57 6 Faulkner (AL) 10 29:57 4,322 865
28:47 7 Campbellsville (KY) 10 28:47 3,500 700
Rk Team gp td fg xpt 2pc dxp saf pts ppg
35.0 1 Bethel (TN) 6 27 7 23 1 - - 210 35.0
30.833333333333332 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 28 - 21 1 - - 185 30.8
32.833333333333336 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 26 5 26 - - - 197 32.8
23.833333333333332 4 Campbellsville (KY) 6 21 1 14 - - - 143 23.8
22.666666666666668 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 16 6 16 - - - 136 22.7
11.666666666666666 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 9 2 8 - - - 70 11.7
6.5 7 Faulkner (AL) 6 4 3 4 - 1 - 39 6.5
Rk Team gp rush pass tot off ypg
418.3333333333333 1 Bethel (TN) 6 896 1614 2522 418.3
348.0 2 Campbellsville (KY) 6 254 1834 2088 348.0
357.1666666666667 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 1151 992 2143 357.2
316.3333333333333 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 791 1107 1898 316.3
265.5 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 1202 391 1593 265.5
278.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 767 901 1668 278.0
125.66666666666667 7 Faulkner (AL) 6 156 598 754 125.7
Rk Team gp yds comp-att-int yds/g yds/att yds/comp td
305.6666666666667 1 Campbellsville (KY) 6 1834 156-239-11 305.7 7.7 11.8 17
269.0 2 Bethel (TN) 6 1614 123-177-6 269.0 9.1 13.1 21
184.5 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 1107 89-163-8 184.5 6.8 12.4 9
165.33333333333334 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 992 75-125-3 165.3 7.9 13.2 9
150.16666666666666 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 901 67-161-8 150.2 5.6 13.4 7
99.66666666666667 6 Faulkner (AL) 6 598 55-123-8 99.7 4.9 10.9 2
65.16666666666667 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 391 43-99-8 65.2 3.9 9.1 0
Rk Team gp yds att yds/g avg td
200.33333333333334 1 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 1202 296 200.3 4.1 9
191.83333333333334 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 1151 247 191.8 4.7 14
149.33333333333334 3 Bethel (TN) 6 896 197 149.3 4.5 5
127.83333333333333 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 767 220 127.8 3.5 7
131.83333333333334 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 791 208 131.8 3.8 10
42.333333333333336 6 Campbellsville (KY) 6 254 134 42.3 1.9 3
26.0 7 Faulkner (AL) 6 156 182 26.0 0.9 1
Rk Team gp total rush pass pen 1st/g
22.833333333333332 1 Bethel (TN) 6 137 49 81 7 22.8
19.833333333333332 2 Campbellsville (KY) 6 119 18 87 14 19.8
21.833333333333332 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 131 75 45 11 21.8
16.166666666666668 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 97 75 16 6 16.2
17.0 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 102 49 48 5 17.0
16.166666666666668 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 97 46 37 14 16.2
8.0 7 Faulkner (AL) 6 48 18 24 6 8.0
Rk Team gp 3rd made 3rd % 4th made 4th %
0.44594594594594594 1 Bethel (TN) 6 33-74 45% 2-7 29%
0.4225352112676056 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 30-71 42% 6-11 55%
0.34408602150537637 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 32-93 34% 8-14 57%
0.358695652173913 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 33-92 36% 3-10 30%
0.3116883116883117 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 24-77 31% 7-18 39%
0.34328358208955223 6 Campbellsville (KY) 6 23-67 34% 5-17 29%
0.2 7 Faulkner (AL) 6 16-80 20% 1-5 20%
Rk Team gp kr ko avg pr avg
25.428571428571427 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 14-356 25.4 6-53 8.8
20.153846153846153 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 13-262 20.2 14-231 16.5
18.636363636363637 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 22-410 18.6 8-92 11.5
17.55 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 20-351 17.6 13-111 8.5
15.35 5 Campbellsville (KY) 6 20-307 15.3 10-39 3.9
15.090909090909092 6 Faulkner (AL) 6 22-332 15.1 4-34 8.5
14.8125 7 Bethel (TN) 6 16-237 14.8 13-175 13.5
Rk Team gp fg fg % pat pat % punts avg kickoffs avg
0.8333333333333334 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 5-6 83.3% 26-26 100.0% 22-843 38.3 37-1925 52.0
0.6 2 Faulkner (AL) 6 3-5 60.0% 4-4 100.0% 47-1673 35.6 13-576 44.3
0.6363636363636364 3 Bethel (TN) 6 7-11 63.6% 23-26 88.5% 17-629 37.0 40-2333 58.3
0.6666666666666666 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 6-9 66.7% 16-17 94.1% 35-1313 37.5 29-1712 59.0
0.6666666666666666 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 2-3 66.7% 8-9 88.9% 38-975 25.7 17-669 39.4
0.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 0-3 0.0% 21-26 80.8% 31-1245 40.2 33-1918 58.1
0.5 7 Campbellsville (KY) 6 1-2 50.0% 14-20 70.0% 21-697 33.2 29-1689 58.2
Rk Team gp scores rz % td td %
0.8275862068965517 1 Bethel (TN) 6 24-29 83% 19-29 66%
0.85 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 17-20 85% 13-20 65%
0.7777777777777778 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 14-18 78% 8-18 44%
0.6363636363636364 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 14-22 64% 14-22 64%
0.6153846153846154 5 Campbellsville (KY) 6 16-26 62% 15-26 58%
0.5625 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 9-16 56% 7-16 44%
0.25 7 Faulkner (AL) 6 2-8 25% 1-8 13%
Rk Team gp fum-lost fum rec int int yds int avg td tkl sack
9.0 1 Bethel (TN) 6 7-4 9 9 9-92 10.2 0 369 19
6.0 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 3-2 6 12 12-133 11.1 2 322 15
7.0 3 Faulkner (AL) 6 8-5 7 9 9-80 8.9 1 425 8
5.0 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 5-2 5 7 7-35 5.0 1 379 16
7.0 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 4-0 7 4 4-35 8.8 4 351 24
2.0 6 Campbellsville (KY) 6 16-13 2 6 6-52 8.7 1 406 15
4.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 6-5 4 5 5-18 3.6 0 325 18
Rk Team gp pen pen/g pen yards pen yards/g
45.0 1 Bethel (TN) 6 45 7.5 448 74.7
47.0 2 Campbellsville (KY) 6 47 7.8 430 71.7
46.0 3 Faulkner (AL) 6 46 7.7 392 65.3
36.0 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 36 6.0 305 50.8
31.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 31 5.2 300 50.0
25.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 25 4.2 172 28.7
24.0 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 24 4.0 258 43.0
Rk Team gp ppg pts yd/g pass y/g rush y/g tkl/g int fum rec sack td
10.833333333333334 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 10.8 65 246.7 158.5 88.2 53.7 12 5 15 2
15.166666666666666 2 Bethel (TN) 6 15.2 91 226.7 136.7 90.0 61.5 9 7 19 0
15.833333333333334 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 15.8 95 278.0 190.3 87.7 58.5 4 7 24 4
29.166666666666668 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 29.2 175 391.5 217.7 173.8 63.2 7 3 16 1
27.5 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 27.5 165 292.7 203.2 89.5 54.2 5 4 18 0
28.0 6 Campbellsville (KY) 6 28.0 168 304.7 132.5 172.2 67.7 6 3 15 1
36.833333333333336 7 Faulkner (AL) 6 36.8 221 368.8 200.7 168.2 70.8 9 2 8 1
Rk Team gp top attend avg
29:21 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 6 29:21 0 0
32:32 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 6 32:32 4,450 1,484
32:35 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 6 32:35 0 0
31:25 4 Bethel (TN) 6 31:25 2,000 667
29:50 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 6 29:50 4,136 1,379
27:11 6 Faulkner (AL) 6 27:11 0 0
28:42 7 Campbellsville (KY) 6 28:42 3,500 1,167