Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2023 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Baseball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Rochester 48 1353 317 194 180 364 .234 .341 .326
.326 2 Michigan-Dearborn 42 1237 317 181 153 323 .256 .355 .365
.365 3 Cleary (MI) 50 1438 383 245 233 310 .266 .390 .380
.380 4 Siena Heights 44 1361 382 212 187 294 .281 .382 .382
.382 5 Cornerstone 50 1503 428 279 192 358 .285 .388 .462
.462 6 Lourdes 46 1412 406 263 227 285 .288 .398 .404
.404 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 1649 491 316 237 403 .298 .405 .444
.444 8 Indiana Tech 50 1540 470 352 241 292 .305 .418 .485
.485 9 Northwestern Ohio 47 1417 441 303 181 235 .311 .404 .461
.461 10 Lawrence Tech 50 1607 502 323 217 314 .312 .409 .460
.460 11 Concordia (MI) 58 1834 591 493 351 358 .322 .448 .534
.534 12 Madonna (Mich.) 51 1686 571 409 218 311 .339 .428 .590
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Rochester 48 66 5 16 87
87 2 Siena Heights 44 62 5 22 89
89 3 Michigan-Dearborn 42 63 9 18 90
90 4 Lourdes 46 59 15 25 99
99 5 Cleary (MI) 50 72 17 19 108
108 6 Northwestern Ohio 47 98 9 32 139
139 7 Lawrence Tech 50 96 11 40 147
147 8 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 91 24 34 149
149 9 Indiana Tech 50 96 14 51 161
161 10 Cornerstone 50 106 22 39 167
167 11 Concordia (MI) 58 124 12 80 216
216 12 Madonna (Mich.) 51 110 20 91 221
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 42 202 452 37 12
12 2 Rochester 48 223 441 78 31
31 3 Siena Heights 44 247 520 44 12
12 4 Cleary (MI) 50 282 546 84 13
13 5 Lourdes 46 300 570 52 17
17 6 Cornerstone 50 307 695 72 14
14 7 Northwestern Ohio 47 321 653 84 18
18 8 Lawrence Tech 50 372 740 64 28
28 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 373 732 101 19
19 10 Indiana Tech 50 397 747 56 18
18 11 Madonna (Mich.) 51 460 994 74 20
20 12 Concordia (MI) 58 546 979 88 24
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 42 44 12 14 35 291 284 1.02 1460
1460 2 Rochester 48 47 15 11 20 319 288 1.11 1606
1606 3 Siena Heights 44 43 12 13 32 272 380 .72 1616
1616 4 Northwestern Ohio 47 60 29 31 23 351 409 .86 1718
1718 5 Lourdes 46 49 27 11 32 329 384 .86 1726
1726 6 Cornerstone 50 76 23 16 30 316 404 .78 1810
1810 7 Cleary (MI) 50 75 28 37 33 364 394 .92 1811
1811 8 Indiana Tech 50 77 26 24 25 357 405 .88 1908
1908 9 Lawrence Tech 50 63 23 28 25 397 386 1.03 1938
1938 10 Madonna (Mich.) 51 60 19 11 24 356 441 .81 1994
1994 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 75 24 25 22 327 369 .89 2010
2010 12 Concordia (MI) 58 92 29 36 33 385 507 .76 2342
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Concordia (MI) 58 58 457.2 444 267 211 4.15
4.15 2 Cleary (MI) 50 50 374.2 448 281 233 5.60
5.60 3 Northwestern Ohio 47 47 352.0 348 265 219 5.60
5.60 3 Indiana Tech 50 50 385.1 410 298 252 5.89
5.89 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 53 400.2 437 330 281 6.31
6.31 6 Madonna (Mich.) 51 51 392.2 456 333 295 6.76
6.76 7 Lawrence Tech 50 50 386.1 470 355 296 6.90
6.90 8 Cornerstone 50 50 372.1 435 327 287 6.94
6.94 9 Lourdes 46 46 345.0 451 364 307 8.01
8.01 10 Siena Heights 44 44 324.1 463 362 324 8.99
8.99 11 Michigan-Dearborn 42 42 299.0 478 447 353 10.63
10.63 12 Rochester 48 48 337.0 528 586 498 13.30
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Concordia (MI) 58 58 428 8.42 39 1.46
1.46 2 Northwestern Ohio 47 47 375 9.59 22 1.61
1.61 3 Cleary (MI) 50 50 234 5.62 34 1.62
1.62 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 53 347 7.79 52 1.65
1.65 5 Indiana Tech 50 50 404 9.44 43 1.69
1.69 6 Cornerstone 50 50 265 6.41 37 1.69
1.69 6 Madonna (Mich.) 51 51 301 6.90 40 1.72
1.72 8 Lawrence Tech 50 50 354 8.25 38 1.74
1.74 9 Lourdes 46 46 241 6.29 41 1.88
1.88 10 Siena Heights 44 44 225 6.24 42 1.97
1.97 11 Michigan-Dearborn 42 42 220 6.62 37 2.40
2.40 12 Rochester 48 48 252 6.73 42 2.53
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Rochester 48 1446 1011 309 126 85 .913
.913 2 Michigan-Dearborn 42 1316 897 323 96 19 .927
.927 3 Lourdes 46 1498 1034 387 77 18 .949
.949 4 Cornerstone 50 1610 1117 412 81 9 .950
.950 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 1667 1208 386 73 14 .956
.956 6 Concordia (MI) 58 1879 1371 428 80 17 .957
.957 7 Indiana Tech 50 1620 1150 403 67 35 .959
.959 8 Siena Heights 44 1372 973 345 54 26 .961
.961 9 Cleary (MI) 50 1599 1123 418 58 17 .964
.964 10 Madonna (Mich.) 51 1671 1176 436 59 11 .965
.965 11 Northwestern Ohio 47 1478 1055 371 52 22 .965
.965 11 Lawrence Tech 50 1602 1158 388 56 16 .965
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Lourdes 46 28 73 10 .120 0
0 2 Lawrence Tech 50 26 85 15 .150 0
0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 42 13 113 22 .163 0
0 2 Siena Heights 44 19 87 17 .163 0
0 2 Rochester 48 28 112 22 .164 0
0 2 Indiana Tech 50 34 68 14 .171 1
1 7 Northwestern Ohio 47 34 64 15 .190 0
0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 51 32 62 15 .195 0
0 8 Concordia (MI) 58 35 37 9 .196 3
3 10 Cleary (MI) 50 32 53 13 .197 0
0 11 Cornerstone 50 28 64 16 .200 0
0 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 53 25 74 19 .204 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Indiana Tech 23 268 12
12 2 Cleary (MI) 18 427 24
24 3 Rochester 17 403 24
24 3 Michigan-Dearborn 15 494 33
33 5 Concordia (MI) 19 734 39
39 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 985 45
45 7 Northwestern Ohio 17 786 47
47 8 Lourdes 17 930 55
55 9 Cornerstone 16 1,146 72
72 10 Lawrence Tech 15 1,140 76
76 11 Madonna (Mich.) 17 1,339 79
79 12 Siena Heights 17 1,868 110
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Rochester 32 917 223 121 101 221 .243 .335 .325
.325 2 Michigan-Dearborn 31 934 248 148 117 214 .266 .366 .384
.384 3 Cleary (MI) 32 940 258 165 146 197 .274 .393 .397
.397 4 Siena Heights 32 983 262 141 136 218 .267 .373 .369
.369 5 Cornerstone 32 1010 308 195 126 217 .305 .403 .500
.500 6 Lourdes 32 979 280 189 162 188 .286 .398 .412
.412 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 965 321 199 131 219 .333 .429 .499
.499 8 Indiana Tech 30 892 259 200 148 154 .290 .413 .441
.441 9 Northwestern Ohio 32 987 338 243 136 140 .342 .434 .481
.481 10 Lawrence Tech 30 977 329 226 139 165 .337 .435 .519
.519 11 Concordia (MI) 31 961 321 280 172 175 .334 .454 .561
.561 12 Madonna (Mich.) 30 1026 378 286 127 153 .368 .452 .655
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Rochester 32 41 2 10 53
53 2 Siena Heights 32 45 4 16 65
65 3 Michigan-Dearborn 31 51 9 14 74
74 4 Lourdes 32 39 12 20 71
71 5 Cleary (MI) 32 49 15 12 76
76 6 Northwestern Ohio 32 73 8 16 97
97 7 Lawrence Tech 30 66 8 32 106
106 8 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 59 15 24 98
98 9 Indiana Tech 30 70 11 14 95
95 10 Cornerstone 32 78 19 27 124
124 11 Concordia (MI) 31 75 7 43 125
125 12 Madonna (Mich.) 30 72 15 64 151
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 31 166 359 31 8
8 2 Rochester 32 139 298 41 16
16 3 Siena Heights 32 170 363 31 7
7 4 Cleary (MI) 32 189 373 49 11
11 5 Lourdes 32 212 403 37 13
13 6 Cornerstone 32 214 505 54 10
10 7 Northwestern Ohio 32 258 475 71 9
9 8 Lawrence Tech 30 264 507 42 17
17 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 232 482 64 12
12 10 Indiana Tech 30 222 393 29 10
10 11 Madonna (Mich.) 30 322 672 57 8
8 12 Concordia (MI) 31 307 539 42 13
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Michigan-Dearborn 31 36 9 13 29 235 221 1.06 1109
1109 2 Rochester 32 31 10 7 19 233 225 1.04 1066
1066 3 Siena Heights 32 35 8 7 24 200 277 .72 1169
1169 4 Northwestern Ohio 32 42 25 25 15 233 300 .78 1215
1215 5 Lourdes 32 33 20 9 21 228 278 .82 1203
1203 6 Cornerstone 32 51 17 12 20 213 282 .76 1216
1216 7 Cleary (MI) 32 51 20 27 22 236 271 .87 1184
1184 8 Indiana Tech 30 53 21 15 13 209 269 .78 1129
1129 9 Lawrence Tech 30 41 12 17 19 252 222 1.14 1186
1186 10 Madonna (Mich.) 30 41 15 3 14 215 273 .79 1212
1212 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 40 12 15 12 197 227 .87 1163
1163 12 Concordia (MI) 31 51 15 19 19 201 264 .76 1218
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Concordia (MI) 31 31 238.2 253 145 111 4.19
4.19 2 Cleary (MI) 32 32 248.2 312 203 173 6.26
6.26 3 Northwestern Ohio 32 32 240.2 235 172 136 5.09
5.09 4 Indiana Tech 30 30 227.0 241 175 146 5.79
5.79 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 30 230.2 241 161 133 5.19
5.19 6 Madonna (Mich.) 30 30 231.2 279 196 169 6.57
6.57 7 Lawrence Tech 30 30 230.2 274 198 173 6.75
6.75 8 Cornerstone 32 32 246.0 295 226 195 7.13
7.13 9 Lourdes 32 32 243.2 311 225 187 6.91
6.91 10 Siena Heights 32 32 240.1 345 272 247 9.25
9.25 11 Michigan-Dearborn 31 31 228.1 360 318 253 9.97
9.97 12 Rochester 32 32 233.0 379 404 355 13.71
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Concordia (MI) 31 31 228 8.60 19 1.54
1.54 2 Northwestern Ohio 32 32 265 9.91 8 1.57
1.57 3 Cleary (MI) 32 32 150 5.43 25 1.70
1.70 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 30 187 7.30 27 1.55
1.55 5 Indiana Tech 30 30 235 9.32 29 1.67
1.67 6 Cornerstone 32 32 167 6.11 26 1.73
1.73 7 Madonna (Mich.) 30 30 190 7.38 15 1.83
1.83 8 Lawrence Tech 30 30 201 7.84 22 1.69
1.69 9 Lourdes 32 32 168 6.21 29 1.72
1.72 10 Siena Heights 32 32 163 6.10 39 1.91
1.91 11 Michigan-Dearborn 31 31 159 6.27 25 2.37
2.37 12 Rochester 32 32 148 5.72 28 2.60
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Rochester 32 1012 699 229 84 67 .917
.917 2 Michigan-Dearborn 31 1012 685 259 68 11 .933
.933 3 Lourdes 32 1051 730 275 46 10 .956
.956 4 Cornerstone 32 1067 738 272 57 7 .947
.947 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 945 692 215 38 2 .960
.960 6 Concordia (MI) 31 983 715 224 44 9 .955
.955 7 Indiana Tech 30 968 679 244 45 25 .954
.954 8 Siena Heights 32 1001 721 247 33 18 .967
.967 9 Cleary (MI) 32 1087 746 301 40 11 .963
.963 10 Madonna (Mich.) 30 966 693 236 37 9 .962
.962 11 Northwestern Ohio 32 1019 722 256 41 12 .960
.960 12 Lawrence Tech 30 964 691 243 30 13 .969
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Lourdes 32 19 36 4 .100 0
0 2 Lawrence Tech 30 20 54 10 .156 0
0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 31 10 90 18 .167 0
0 2 Siena Heights 32 15 58 12 .171 0
0 2 Rochester 32 24 71 18 .202 0
0 2 Indiana Tech 30 22 38 9 .191 1
1 7 Northwestern Ohio 32 24 48 10 .172 0
0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 30 21 31 6 .162 0
0 8 Concordia (MI) 31 19 19 7 .269 2
2 10 Cleary (MI) 32 21 31 11 .262 0
0 11 Cornerstone 32 18 35 10 .222 0
0 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 30 14 37 8 .178 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Indiana Tech 16 268 17
17 2 Cleary (MI) 16 427 27
27 3 Rochester 16 403 26
26 4 Michigan-Dearborn 15 494 33
33 5 Concordia (MI) 14 430 31
31 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 16 767 48
48 7 Northwestern Ohio 16 706 45
45 8 Lourdes 16 903 57
57 9 Cornerstone 16 1,146 72
72 10 Lawrence Tech 14 1,140 82
82 11 Madonna (Mich.) 14 1,097 79
79 12 Siena Heights 16 1,751 110