Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Mid-South Conference Baseball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
1178.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 2106 723 506 271 394 .343 .427 .559
782.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 1608 545 350 203 329 .339 .429 .486
978.9999999999999 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 1675 554 443 257 397 .331 .440 .584
629.0 4 Thomas More 45 1429 452 298 193 281 .316 .417 .440
912.0 5 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 1853 567 359 203 381 .306 .390 .492
689.0 6 Tennessee Southern 47 1443 427 268 166 367 .296 .386 .477
690.0 7 Shawnee State 44 1383 390 278 200 375 .282 .390 .499
644.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 1581 441 278 169 302 .279 .369 .407
513.0 9 Bethel (TN) 42 1331 369 189 161 309 .277 .381 .385
543.0 10 Campbellsville 49 1458 377 225 171 320 .259 .354 .372
524.0 11 Pikeville 48 1457 369 207 177 348 .253 .354 .360
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
1178.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 154 17 89 260
978.9999999999999 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 116 15 93 224
912.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 109 13 70 192
690.0 4 Shawnee State 44 75 12 67 154
689.0 5 Tennessee Southern 47 88 9 52 149
782.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 95 11 40 146
629.0 7 Thomas More 45 89 11 22 122
644.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 70 11 37 118
543.0 9 Campbellsville 49 67 12 25 104
524.0 10 Pikeville 48 55 17 22 94
513.0 11 Bethel (TN) 42 65 5 23 93
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
1178.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 561 1178 99 19
978.9999999999999 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 474 979 65 17
912.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 408 912 145 26
782.0 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 405 782 76 24
690.0 5 Shawnee State 44 293 690 26 13
689.0 6 Tennessee Southern 47 283 689 41 12
644.0 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 309 644 103 30
629.0 8 Thomas More 45 343 629 51 11
543.0 9 Campbellsville 49 249 543 49 19
524.0 10 Pikeville 48 252 524 65 18
513.0 11 Bethel (TN) 42 222 513 39 16
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1178.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 61 31 11 39 392 563 .70 2480
912.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 64 19 13 22 403 472 .85 2152
978.9999999999999 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 87 23 16 27 277 444 .62 2058
782.0 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 62 14 8 30 332 356 .93 1895
644.0 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 67 16 27 20 377 435 .87 1860
629.0 6 Thomas More 45 70 22 16 33 339 322 1.05 1730
543.0 7 Campbellsville 49 56 22 19 21 342 404 .85 1726
524.0 8 Pikeville 48 59 18 15 21 328 358 .92 1726
689.0 9 Tennessee Southern 47 56 15 26 20 271 368 .74 1706
690.0 10 Shawnee State 44 56 19 3 17 246 358 .69 1661
513.0 11 Bethel (TN) 42 69 11 20 29 288 331 .87 1592
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
689.0 1 Tennessee Southern 47 47 352.1 495 446 353 9.02
524.0 2 Pikeville 48 48 356.2 508 382 335 8.45
782.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 48 372.0 494 372 340 8.23
690.0 4 Shawnee State 44 44 334.0 434 310 253 6.82
629.0 5 Thomas More 45 45 348.2 409 290 234 6.04
978.9999999999999 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 53 402.1 472 333 267 5.97
513.0 7 Bethel (TN) 42 42 334.1 351 239 215 5.79
543.0 8 Campbellsville 49 49 374.0 386 279 225 5.41
1178.0 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 62 492.0 537 309 264 4.83
644.0 10 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 51 406.1 428 245 215 4.76
912.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 56 457.2 481 263 227 4.46
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
689.0 1 Tennessee Southern 47 47 358 9.14 54 2.06
524.0 2 Pikeville 48 48 233 5.88 36 2.04
782.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 48 356 8.61 64 1.96
690.0 4 Shawnee State 44 44 319 8.60 35 1.75
978.9999999999999 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 53 414 9.26 47 1.71
629.0 6 Thomas More 45 45 291 7.51 46 1.61
1178.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 62 464 8.49 44 1.52
543.0 8 Campbellsville 49 49 386 9.29 32 1.49
513.0 9 Bethel (TN) 42 42 277 7.46 38 1.44
912.0 10 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 56 411 8.08 49 1.40
644.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 51 342 7.58 27 1.39
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
912.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 1946 1373 518 55 12 .972
1178.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 2064 1475 518 71 14 .966
644.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 1738 1219 449 70 20 .960
543.0 4 Campbellsville 49 1575 1121 383 71 19 .955
629.0 5 Thomas More 45 1495 1046 380 69 13 .954
782.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 1528 1115 341 72 11 .953
978.9999999999999 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 1746 1204 456 86 24 .951
524.0 8 Pikeville 48 1499 1059 361 79 19 .947
690.0 9 Shawnee State 44 1471 1002 385 84 24 .943
513.0 10 Bethel (TN) 42 1403 1002 318 83 17 .941
689.0 11 Tennessee Southern 47 1455 1036 321 98 48 .933
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
513.0 1 Bethel (TN) 42 22 54 30 .357 0
912.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 56 41 44 21 .323 1
978.9999999999999 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 53 38 61 28 .315 0
629.0 4 Thomas More 45 23 44 19 .302 0
1178.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 62 40 58 19 .247 2
644.0 6 Georgetown (Ky.) 51 29 55 16 .225 0
690.0 7 Shawnee State 44 21 56 15 .211 0
782.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 48 23 55 12 .179 0
543.0 9 Campbellsville 49 16 62 13 .173 0
524.0 10 Pikeville 48 15 77 15 .163 0
689.0 11 Tennessee Southern 47 22 80 14 .149 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
978.9999999999999 1 Cumberland (Tenn.) 23 2,808 123
543.0 2 Campbellsville 21 2,575 123
782.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 27 2,357 88
689.0 4 Tennessee Southern 28 2,036 73
1178.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 1,615 65
513.0 6 Bethel (TN) 24 1,115 47
524.0 7 Pikeville 22 375 18
912.0 8 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 27 420 16
644.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 28 54 2
690.0 10 Shawnee State 15 0 0
629.0 11 Thomas More 18 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
451.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 825 278 174 98 132 .337 .418 .547
374.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 794 272 157 88 143 .343 .423 .471
518.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 755 287 234 107 156 .380 .474 .686
318.0 4 Thomas More 22 735 234 129 74 165 .318 .401 .433
368.0 5 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 756 234 148 73 160 .310 .390 .487
318.0 6 Tennessee Southern 23 713 201 113 80 190 .282 .369 .446
384.0 7 Shawnee State 23 760 218 139 92 193 .287 .376 .505
331.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 748 218 136 77 159 .291 .373 .443
287.0 9 Bethel (TN) 23 728 210 104 86 153 .288 .391 .394
241.0 10 Campbellsville 22 655 168 87 73 143 .256 .344 .368
214.0 11 Pikeville 23 667 156 83 72 155 .234 .329 .321
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
451.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 52 8 35 95
518.0 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 55 7 54 116
368.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 40 5 28 73
384.0 4 Shawnee State 23 39 5 39 83
318.0 5 Tennessee Southern 23 40 7 21 68
374.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 58 4 12 74
318.0 7 Thomas More 22 32 5 14 51
331.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 36 4 23 63
241.0 9 Campbellsville 22 25 3 14 42
214.0 10 Pikeville 23 16 6 10 32
287.0 11 Bethel (TN) 23 36 4 11 51
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
451.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 197 451 36 8
518.0 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 251 518 23 8
368.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 169 368 48 12
374.0 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 184 374 30 9
384.0 5 Shawnee State 23 145 384 6 4
318.0 6 Tennessee Southern 23 126 318 14 5
331.0 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 152 331 40 13
318.0 8 Thomas More 22 151 318 16 6
241.0 9 Campbellsville 22 97 241 15 11
214.0 10 Pikeville 23 102 214 21 10
287.0 11 Bethel (TN) 23 126 287 18 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
451.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 23 9 7 19 169 238 .71 962
368.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 30 5 6 10 164 184 .89 870
518.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 40 13 7 12 125 187 .67 922
374.0 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 27 6 3 19 176 184 .96 918
331.0 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 26 9 13 12 166 196 .85 873
318.0 6 Thomas More 22 32 7 10 16 172 159 1.08 858
241.0 7 Campbellsville 22 18 8 10 10 167 175 .95 764
214.0 8 Pikeville 23 26 7 10 12 161 185 .87 782
318.0 9 Tennessee Southern 23 21 4 13 17 142 180 .79 831
384.0 10 Shawnee State 23 22 10 2 13 142 201 .71 886
287.0 11 Bethel (TN) 23 41 7 16 23 170 176 .97 878
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
318.0 1 Tennessee Southern 23 23 177.0 283 253 197 10.02
214.0 2 Pikeville 23 23 172.2 274 190 163 8.50
374.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 24 183.0 258 201 182 8.95
384.0 4 Shawnee State 23 23 183.1 251 174 148 7.27
318.0 5 Thomas More 22 22 176.0 224 152 122 6.24
518.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 22 175.0 215 143 120 6.17
287.0 7 Bethel (TN) 23 23 183.0 189 125 114 5.61
241.0 8 Campbellsville 22 22 167.1 185 134 121 6.51
451.0 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 25 196.2 207 113 100 4.58
331.0 10 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 24 190.0 198 116 103 4.88
368.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 24 186.2 184 87 83 4.00
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
318.0 1 Tennessee Southern 23 23 175 8.90 29 2.27
214.0 2 Pikeville 23 23 104 5.42 23 2.21
374.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 24 172 8.46 38 2.04
384.0 4 Shawnee State 23 23 172 8.44 28 1.75
518.0 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 22 172 8.85 21 1.77
318.0 6 Thomas More 22 22 148 7.57 28 1.66
451.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 25 154 7.05 20 1.44
241.0 8 Campbellsville 22 22 173 9.30 14 1.56
287.0 9 Bethel (TN) 23 23 149 7.33 16 1.39
368.0 10 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 24 179 8.63 24 1.33
331.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 24 151 7.15 13 1.37
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
368.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 773 560 199 14 8 .982
451.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 846 590 233 23 4 .973
331.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 812 570 204 38 7 .953
241.0 4 Campbellsville 22 699 501 170 28 6 .960
318.0 5 Thomas More 22 740 528 182 30 6 .959
374.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 751 548 162 41 5 .945
518.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 739 525 188 26 10 .965
214.0 8 Pikeville 23 740 518 181 41 5 .945
384.0 9 Shawnee State 23 827 550 228 49 13 .941
287.0 10 Bethel (TN) 23 779 548 189 42 8 .946
318.0 11 Tennessee Southern 23 750 531 169 50 23 .933
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
287.0 1 Bethel (TN) 23 14 36 15 .294 0
368.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24 23 15 5 .250 1
518.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 22 21 13 7 .350 0
318.0 4 Thomas More 22 9 19 10 .345 0
451.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 25 24 15 12 .444 1
331.0 6 Georgetown (Ky.) 24 19 18 6 .250 0
384.0 7 Shawnee State 23 13 24 7 .226 0
374.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 24 11 34 5 .128 0
241.0 9 Campbellsville 22 6 25 10 .286 0
214.0 10 Pikeville 23 8 29 8 .216 0
318.0 11 Tennessee Southern 23 14 37 4 .098 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
518.0 1 Cumberland (Tenn.) 12 2,071 173
241.0 2 Campbellsville 10 1,250 125
374.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 1,016 85
318.0 4 Tennessee Southern 12 1,436 120
451.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 9 625 70
287.0 6 Bethel (TN) 12 550 46
214.0 7 Pikeville 11 175 16
368.0 8 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 12 0 0
331.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 12 54 5
384.0 10 Shawnee State 11 0 0
318.0 11 Thomas More 9 0 0