Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Mid-South Conference Women's Volleyball Team Stats

Rk Team gp sh g gfa a pts sh% shpg
1.3299647249499476 1 Tennessee Southern 24 391 72 3.00 62 206 .184 16.3
0.8108364418031232 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 23 358 55 2.39 53 163 .154 15.6
1.6127167630057804 3 Campbellsville (KY) 19 327 63 3.32 36 162 .193 17.2
1.2222222222222223 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 18 355 47 2.61 58 152 .132 19.7
1.405626361760793 5 Thomas More 20 249 47 2.35 49 143 .189 12.4
1.6329795536132354 6 Shawnee State 19 323 51 2.68 23 125 .158 17.0
2.072184194150591 7 Bethel (TN) 18 258 39 2.17 24 102 .151 14.3
1.8823529411764706 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 17 247 34 2.00 31 99 .138 14.5
2.4131579234198393 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 17 228 32 1.88 18 82 .140 13.4
2.388888888888889 10 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 18 149 22 1.22 19 63 .148 8.3
3.7233083344825024 11 Pikeville 18 148 16 0.89 9 41 .108 8.2
Rk Team gp ga gaa sv so
3.7233083344825024 1 Pikeville 18 65 3.72 176 2
2.4131579234198393 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 17 41 2.41 125 1
2.388888888888889 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 18 43 2.39 117 4
2.072184194150591 4 Bethel (TN) 18 37 2.07 84 4
1.8823529411764706 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 17 32 1.88 96 3
1.6329795536132354 6 Shawnee State 19 31 1.63 74 4
1.6127167630057804 7 Campbellsville (KY) 19 31 1.61 80 5
1.405626361760793 8 Thomas More 20 27 1.41 57 7
1.3299647249499476 9 Tennessee Southern 24 31 1.33 96 10
1.2222222222222223 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 18 22 1.22 72 7
0.8108364418031232 11 Cumberlands (Ky.) 23 19 0.81 81 12
Rk Team gp yc rc ck
0.8108364418031232 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 23 10 0 124
1.3299647249499476 2 Tennessee Southern 24 23 2 124
1.2222222222222223 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 18 23 0 95
1.8823529411764706 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 17 13 0 95
2.072184194150591 5 Bethel (TN) 18 13 0 93
1.405626361760793 6 Thomas More 20 15 1 92
1.6329795536132354 7 Shawnee State 19 11 0 90
2.4131579234198393 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 17 19 0 83
1.6127167630057804 9 Campbellsville (KY) 19 16 0 58
3.7233083344825024 10 Pikeville 18 10 0 53
2.388888888888889 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 18 8 0 44
Rk Team gp sh g gfa a pts sh% shpg
1.0 1 Tennessee Southern 10 156 34 3.40 33 101 .218 15.6
0.5460428744775516 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 11 177 31 2.82 31 93 .175 16.1
1.3 3 Campbellsville (KY) 10 181 34 3.40 22 90 .188 18.1
1.1 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 212 25 2.50 29 79 .118 21.2
1.7713116968317062 5 Thomas More 10 114 24 2.40 24 72 .211 11.4
2.3671432425141625 6 Shawnee State 11 114 11 1.00 5 27 .096 10.4
2.6022649342946638 7 Bethel (TN) 10 131 19 1.90 12 50 .145 13.1
1.4 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 183 29 2.90 25 83 .158 18.3
2.702352047152151 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 100 10 1.00 6 26 .100 10.0
3.3 10 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 10 61 7 0.70 5 19 .115 6.1
4.862008220786847 11 Pikeville 10 57 5 0.50 5 15 .088 5.7
Rk Team gp ga gaa sv so
4.862008220786847 1 Pikeville 10 46 4.86 109 0
2.702352047152151 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 27 2.70 75 1
3.3 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 10 33 3.30 69 0
2.6022649342946638 4 Bethel (TN) 10 26 2.60 50 0
1.4 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 14 1.40 52 3
2.3671432425141625 6 Shawnee State 11 26 2.37 55 1
1.3 7 Campbellsville (KY) 10 13 1.30 43 4
1.7713116968317062 8 Thomas More 10 17 1.77 38 4
1.0 9 Tennessee Southern 10 10 1.00 38 5
1.1 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 11 1.10 32 5
0.5460428744775516 11 Cumberlands (Ky.) 11 6 0.55 38 6
Rk Team gp yc rc ck
0.5460428744775516 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 11 5 0 76
1.0 2 Tennessee Southern 10 7 1 58
1.1 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 16 0 59
1.4 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 10 7 0 65
2.6022649342946638 5 Bethel (TN) 10 9 0 43
1.7713116968317062 6 Thomas More 10 5 0 44
2.3671432425141625 7 Shawnee State 11 4 0 36
2.702352047152151 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 9 0 35
1.3 9 Campbellsville (KY) 10 8 0 35
4.862008220786847 10 Pikeville 10 5 0 28
3.3 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 10 5 0 17