Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Mid-South Conference Softball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
60.0 1 Campbellsville 56 1520 541 422 209 226 .356 .445 .607
58.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 1594 524 348 183 251 .329 .418 .498
82.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 1640 506 323 147 213 .309 .369 .484
63.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 1378 401 231 126 230 .291 .364 .424
27.0 5 Thomas More 46 1239 359 182 120 208 .290 .358 .396
108.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 1364 395 201 150 194 .290 .364 .404
11.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 1180 332 161 79 199 .281 .334 .388
48.0 8 Tennessee Southern 52 1343 376 210 108 176 .280 .355 .409
37.0 9 Shawnee State 50 1396 383 193 81 216 .274 .324 .375
34.0 10 Pikeville 50 1227 303 127 112 248 .247 .324 .309
64.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 1271 302 154 94 179 .238 .306 .334
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
60.0 1 Campbellsville 56 109 10 84 203
82.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 97 19 51 167
58.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 96 12 50 158
63.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 93 6 26 125
48.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 69 10 28 107
108.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 76 10 20 106
37.0 7 Shawnee State 50 73 11 15 99
27.0 8 Thomas More 46 69 9 15 93
64.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 62 14 11 87
11.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 59 5 19 83
34.0 11 Pikeville 50 55 3 5 63
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
108.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 243 551 108 13
82.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 345 794 82 7
64.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 170 425 64 16
63.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 267 584 63 9
60.0 5 Campbellsville 56 453 922 60 11
58.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 385 794 58 6
48.0 7 Tennessee Southern 52 246 549 48 10
37.0 8 Shawnee State 50 212 523 37 6
34.0 9 Pikeville 50 158 379 34 5
27.0 10 Thomas More 46 214 491 27 12
11.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 172 458 11 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
58.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 71 14 21 16 392 404 .97 1883
82.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 22 20 37 10 379 538 .70 1866
60.0 3 Campbellsville 56 51 20 41 11 302 442 .68 1841
63.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 39 12 42 8 372 322 1.16 1597
108.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 22 20 30 14 344 412 .83 1586
48.0 6 Tennessee Southern 52 54 10 44 10 375 407 .92 1559
37.0 7 Shawnee State 50 24 4 32 11 345 346 1.00 1537
64.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 36 9 23 4 370 379 .98 1433
34.0 9 Pikeville 50 32 7 25 13 300 353 .85 1403
27.0 10 Thomas More 46 18 10 10 18 316 325 .97 1397
11.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 18 6 20 11 292 340 .86 1303
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
34.0 1 Pikeville 50 50 302.2 452 340 276 6.38
27.0 2 Thomas More 46 46 291.2 420 295 251 6.02
63.0 3 Bethel (TN) 50 50 327.1 410 277 242 5.18
64.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 48 318.1 414 254 210 4.62
48.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 52 339.2 407 266 216 4.45
60.0 6 Campbellsville 56 56 352.2 443 243 195 3.87
58.0 7 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 55 369.1 395 243 203 3.85
11.0 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 42 285.0 359 207 141 3.46
37.0 9 Shawnee State 50 50 324.2 298 169 133 2.87
108.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 51 348.0 326 119 100 2.01
82.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 60 412.0 253 88 72 1.22
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
27.0 1 Thomas More 46 46 189 4.54 34 1.95
34.0 2 Pikeville 50 50 178 4.12 36 1.85
64.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 48 138 3.03 30 1.67
48.0 4 Tennessee Southern 52 52 161 3.32 21 1.64
63.0 5 Bethel (TN) 50 50 146 3.12 35 1.62
11.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 42 138 3.39 16 1.55
60.0 7 Campbellsville 56 56 195 3.87 17 1.52
58.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 55 279 5.29 46 1.41
37.0 9 Shawnee State 50 50 177 3.82 16 1.28
108.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 51 235 4.73 14 1.15
82.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 60 502 8.53 13 0.91
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
82.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 1671 1236 396 39 5 .977
108.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 1531 1044 436 51 13 .967
58.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 1472 1108 308 56 2 .962
37.0 4 Shawnee State 50 1541 971 511 59 9 .962
27.0 5 Thomas More 46 1262 875 333 54 7 .957
48.0 6 Tennessee Southern 52 1487 1019 403 65 10 .956
60.0 7 Campbellsville 56 1598 1049 472 77 10 .952
63.0 8 Bethel (TN) 50 1388 939 381 68 10 .951
64.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 1355 951 336 68 5 .950
34.0 10 Pikeville 50 1382 906 401 75 20 .946
11.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 1326 855 371 100 21 .925
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
82.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 3 28 10 .263 0
108.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 28 23 8 .258 0
58.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 17 33 7 .175 0
60.0 4 Campbellsville 56 12 41 8 .163 1
34.0 5 Pikeville 50 5 69 12 .148 0
63.0 6 Bethel (TN) 50 9 43 7 .140 1
27.0 7 Thomas More 46 7 65 9 .122 0
48.0 8 Tennessee Southern 52 13 72 9 .111 0
64.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 12 60 7 .104 0
11.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 14 35 4 .103 0
37.0 11 Shawnee State 50 15 43 4 .085 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
58.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 22.0 2,430 111
48.0 2 Tennessee Southern 30.0 1,802 61
11.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 24.0 1,075 45
64.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 20.0 802 41
63.0 5 Bethel (TN) 19.0 590 32
34.0 6 Pikeville 22.0 595 28
108.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 20.0 472 24
60.0 8 Campbellsville 21.0 460 22
82.0 9 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24.0 131 6
37.0 10 Shawnee State 19.0 0 0
27.0 11 Thomas More 20.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
32.0 1 Campbellsville 30 813 319 262 110 99 .392 .478 .705
28.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 889 306 208 98 125 .344 .432 .528
39.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 891 306 198 83 88 .343 .404 .535
39.0 3 Bethel (TN) 32 898 263 147 63 153 .293 .354 .440
18.0 5 Thomas More 31 835 248 119 74 134 .297 .361 .404
72.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 742 225 109 90 79 .303 .384 .423
5.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 875 232 111 60 144 .265 .320 .376
26.0 8 Tennessee Southern 32 834 235 125 53 96 .282 .350 .434
22.0 9 Shawnee State 31 843 217 82 39 154 .257 .300 .339
7.0 10 Pikeville 30 699 146 40 54 147 .209 .281 .246
41.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 748 164 86 55 106 .219 .292 .303
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
32.0 1 Campbellsville 30 70 5 58 133
39.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 54 15 29 98
28.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 62 7 29 98
39.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 61 4 21 86
26.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 49 9 20 78
72.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 44 6 11 61
22.0 7 Shawnee State 31 38 2 9 49
18.0 8 Thomas More 31 44 6 11 61
41.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 34 4 7 45
5.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 42 5 15 62
7.0 11 Pikeville 30 24 1 0 25
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
72.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 137 314 72 7
39.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 209 477 39 3
41.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 93 227 41 11
39.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 172 395 39 6
32.0 5 Campbellsville 30 280 573 32 4
28.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 226 469 28 3
26.0 7 Tennessee Southern 32 145 362 26 5
22.0 8 Shawnee State 31 96 286 22 3
7.0 9 Pikeville 30 53 172 7 1
18.0 10 Thomas More 31 136 337 18 9
5.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 116 329 5 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
28.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 42 4 8 8 231 206 1.12 1041
39.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 14 9 20 5 208 285 .73 1017
32.0 3 Campbellsville 30 37 15 21 5 166 241 .69 996
39.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 26 8 24 5 248 210 1.18 1019
72.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 14 10 16 7 204 230 .89 872
26.0 6 Tennessee Southern 32 36 4 29 7 255 243 1.05 956
22.0 7 Shawnee State 31 13 3 21 5 231 229 1.01 919
41.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 24 5 14 2 227 229 .99 846
7.0 9 Pikeville 30 17 3 10 9 190 202 .94 783
18.0 10 Thomas More 31 13 7 4 12 229 203 1.13 933
5.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 13 5 14 9 232 255 .91 967
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
7.0 1 Pikeville 30 30 174.2 308 247 204 8.18
18.0 2 Thomas More 31 31 197.2 287 209 187 6.62
39.0 3 Bethel (TN) 32 32 210.0 270 185 168 5.60
41.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 29 191.0 277 177 149 5.46
26.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 32 205.0 270 196 158 5.40
32.0 6 Campbellsville 30 30 182.2 213 108 88 3.37
28.0 7 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 30 198.2 219 138 114 4.02
5.0 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 32 214.0 277 157 117 3.83
22.0 9 Shawnee State 31 31 206.1 221 138 107 3.63
72.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 28 188.0 170 48 44 1.64
39.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 31 214.0 149 59 47 1.54
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
18.0 1 Thomas More 31 31 124 4.39 29 2.02
7.0 2 Pikeville 30 30 92 3.69 27 2.14
41.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 29 75 2.75 23 1.87
26.0 4 Tennessee Southern 32 32 94 3.21 14 1.79
39.0 5 Bethel (TN) 32 32 94 3.13 31 1.64
5.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 32 105 3.43 14 1.54
32.0 7 Campbellsville 30 30 110 4.22 8 1.41
28.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 30 143 5.04 30 1.48
22.0 9 Shawnee State 31 31 99 3.36 15 1.49
72.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 28 127 4.73 8 1.08
39.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 31 262 8.57 11 0.97
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
39.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 873 642 206 25 0 .971
72.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 815 564 229 22 5 .973
28.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 794 596 171 27 1 .966
22.0 4 Shawnee State 31 884 619 226 39 7 .956
18.0 5 Thomas More 31 857 593 229 35 4 .959
26.0 6 Tennessee Southern 32 895 615 236 44 10 .951
32.0 7 Campbellsville 30 821 548 236 37 4 .955
39.0 8 Bethel (TN) 32 919 630 247 42 10 .954
41.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 806 570 197 39 5 .952
7.0 10 Pikeville 30 801 524 224 53 11 .934
5.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 987 642 278 67 18 .932
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
39.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 1 18 4 .182 0
72.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 16 10 4 .286 0
28.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 8 20 4 .167 0
32.0 4 Campbellsville 30 7 13 3 .188 0
7.0 5 Pikeville 30 4 45 5 .100 0
39.0 6 Bethel (TN) 32 3 21 6 .222 0
18.0 7 Thomas More 31 4 41 6 .128 0
26.0 8 Tennessee Southern 32 7 54 5 .085 0
41.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 8 44 5 .102 0
5.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 9 25 4 .138 0
22.0 11 Shawnee State 31 7 38 1 .026 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
28.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 14.0 1,480 106
26.0 2 Tennessee Southern 16.0 1,298 82
5.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 16.0 791 50
41.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 15.0 477 32
39.0 5 Bethel (TN) 16.0 500 32
7.0 6 Pikeville 14.0 220 16
72.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 14.0 377 27
32.0 8 Campbellsville 16.0 400 25
39.0 9 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 16.0 0 0
22.0 10 Shawnee State 15.0 0 0
18.0 11 Thomas More 16.0 0 0