Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2021 Mid-South Conference Football Team Stats

Rk Team gp td fg xpt 2pc dxp saf pts ppg
18.333333333333332 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 79 7 70 2 - - 586 45.1
18.8 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 47 3 44 - - - 343 34.3
21.444444444444443 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 45 5 44 1 1 - 335 33.5
10.076923076923077 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 49 6 39 2 - - 357 32.5
18.90909090909091 5 Pikeville 9 31 5 30 - - - 231 25.7
23.125 6 Thomas More 10 31 7 29 - - - 236 23.6
5.0 7 Campbellsville 9 24 5 18 2 - - 181 20.1
19.428571428571427 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 20 6 14 - - - 152 15.2
Rk Team gp rush pass tot off ypg
18.333333333333332 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 2889 3167 6056 465.8
10.076923076923077 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 1615 3422 5037 457.9
18.8 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 1965 1774 3739 373.9
18.90909090909091 4 Pikeville 9 1241 2060 3301 366.8
21.444444444444443 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 1412 2128 3540 354.0
5.0 6 Campbellsville 9 1311 1584 2895 321.7
23.125 7 Thomas More 10 1305 1733 3038 303.8
19.428571428571427 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 1383 1624 3007 300.7
Rk Team gp yds comp-att-int yds/g yds/att yds/comp td
10.076923076923077 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 3422 197-373-26 311.1 9.2 17.4 30
18.333333333333332 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 3167 243-381-6 243.6 8.3 13.0 34
18.90909090909091 3 Pikeville 9 2060 189-328-13 228.9 6.3 10.9 18
21.444444444444443 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 2128 141-278-8 212.8 7.7 15.1 20
18.8 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 1774 152-270-11 177.4 6.6 11.7 23
5.0 6 Campbellsville 9 1584 141-277-10 176.0 5.7 11.2 11
23.125 7 Thomas More 10 1733 138-294-12 173.3 5.9 12.6 15
19.428571428571427 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 1624 155-291-10 162.4 5.6 10.5 7
Rk Team gp yds att yds/g avg td
18.333333333333332 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 2889 611 222.2 4.7 42
18.8 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 1965 409 196.5 4.8 23
10.076923076923077 3 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 1615 384 146.8 4.2 17
5.0 4 Campbellsville 9 1311 335 145.7 3.9 11
21.444444444444443 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 1412 411 141.2 3.4 21
19.428571428571427 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 1383 424 138.3 3.3 12
18.90909090909091 7 Pikeville 9 1241 345 137.9 3.6 11
23.125 8 Thomas More 10 1305 350 130.5 3.7 14
Rk Team gp total rush pass pen 1st/g
18.333333333333332 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 343 182 137 24 26.4
10.076923076923077 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 240 98 134 8 21.8
18.8 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 213 110 76 27 21.3
21.444444444444443 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 205 96 88 21 20.5
18.90909090909091 5 Pikeville 9 183 66 92 24 20.3
23.125 6 Thomas More 10 180 80 84 16 18.0
19.428571428571427 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 177 81 78 18 17.7
5.0 8 Campbellsville 9 152 73 69 10 16.9
Rk Team gp 3rd made 3rd % 4th made 4th %
18.333333333333332 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 112-216 52% 28-52 54%
10.076923076923077 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 56-148 38% 13-19 68%
21.444444444444443 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 55-151 36% 15-29 52%
18.90909090909091 4 Pikeville 9 55-154 36% 14-35 40%
5.0 5 Campbellsville 9 46-136 34% 10-30 33%
19.428571428571427 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 49-161 30% 9-28 32%
23.125 7 Thomas More 10 41-135 30% 12-23 52%
18.8 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 39-134 29% 17-35 49%
Rk Team gp kr ko avg pr avg
23.125 1 Thomas More 10 32-835 26.1 17-127 7.5
18.90909090909091 2 Pikeville 9 39-925 23.7 15-218 14.5
18.333333333333332 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 25-589 23.6 33-348 10.5
5.0 4 Campbellsville 9 61-1266 20.8 6-21 3.5
21.444444444444443 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 23-469 20.4 27-282 10.4
18.8 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 37-703 19.0 16-160 10.0
10.076923076923077 7 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 41-758 18.5 13-91 7.0
19.428571428571427 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 35-590 16.9 16-121 7.6
Rk Team gp fg fg % pat pat % punts avg kickoffs avg
18.90909090909091 1 Pikeville 9 5-6 83.3% 30-31 96.8% 47-1716 36.5 45-2358 52.4
18.333333333333332 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 7-9 77.8% 70-78 89.7% 38-1460 38.4 100-5657 56.6
5.0 3 Campbellsville 9 5-7 71.4% 18-19 94.7% 50-1783 35.7 36-1904 52.9
19.428571428571427 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 6-9 66.7% 14-17 82.4% 62-2160 34.8 36-1913 53.1
10.076923076923077 5 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 6-9 66.7% 39-43 90.7% 49-1827 37.3 66-3040 46.1
18.8 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 3-5 60.0% 44-47 93.6% 41-1702 41.5 61-3461 56.7
21.444444444444443 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 5-9 55.6% 44-44 100.0% 46-1779 38.7 60-3438 57.3
23.125 8 Thomas More 10 7-13 53.8% 29-31 93.5% 56-2343 41.8 49-2804 57.2
Rk Team gp scores rz % td td %
10.076923076923077 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 38-47 81% 32-47 68%
18.333333333333332 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 61-78 78% 54-78 69%
18.90909090909091 3 Pikeville 9 22-29 76% 17-29 59%
21.444444444444443 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 34-46 74% 30-46 65%
18.8 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 34-47 72% 32-47 68%
19.428571428571427 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 20-30 67% 15-30 50%
23.125 7 Thomas More 10 26-41 63% 21-41 51%
5.0 8 Campbellsville 9 17-29 59% 14-29 48%
Rk Team gp fum-lost fum rec int int yds int avg td tkl sack
23.125 1 Thomas More 10 15-9 7 16 16-370 23.1 2 704 21
21.444444444444443 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 12-8 15 18 18-386 21.4 4 645 44
19.428571428571427 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 21-8 8 7 7-136 19.4 1 636 25
18.90909090909091 4 Pikeville 9 14-7 6 11 11-208 18.9 1 701 26
18.8 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 20-13 11 15 15-282 18.8 1 756 25
18.333333333333332 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 12-7 12 24 24-440 18.3 1 704 39
10.076923076923077 7 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 19-14 10 13 13-131 10.1 1 927 26
5.0 8 Campbellsville 9 10-6 16 4 4-20 5.0 0 637 10
Rk Team gp pen pen/g pen yards pen yards/g
10.076923076923077 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 86 7.8 809 73.5
19.428571428571427 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 77 7.7 696 69.6
18.333333333333332 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 73 5.6 747 57.5
18.8 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 69 6.9 603 60.3
21.444444444444443 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 68 6.8 557 55.7
18.90909090909091 6 Pikeville 9 64 7.1 532 59.1
23.125 7 Thomas More 10 46 4.6 412 41.2
5.0 8 Campbellsville 9 40 4.4 442 49.1
Rk Team gp ppg pts yd/g pass y/g rush y/g tkl/g int fum rec sack td
5.0 1 Campbellsville 9 50.8 457 537.1 199.1 338.0 70.8 4 12 10 0
10.076923076923077 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 28.4 312 350.8 164.1 186.7 84.3 13 9 26 1
18.90909090909091 3 Pikeville 9 26.1 235 400.3 242.8 157.6 77.9 11 6 26 1
19.428571428571427 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 25.7 257 330.8 181.1 149.7 63.6 7 8 25 1
18.8 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 23.0 230 362.8 220.8 142.0 75.6 15 10 25 1
23.125 6 Thomas More 10 22.1 221 378.7 271.1 107.6 70.4 16 8 21 2
21.444444444444443 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 16.1 161 275.7 212.0 63.7 64.5 18 10 44 4
18.333333333333332 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 11.2 146 219.3 159.9 59.4 54.2 24 9 39 1
Rk Team gp top attend avg
18.333333333333332 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 13 35:09 9,053 1,132
19.428571428571427 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 34:04 3,950 790
21.444444444444443 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 33:18 16,545 3,309
18.90909090909091 4 Pikeville 9 30:27 950 190
18.8 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 29:56 0 0
23.125 6 Thomas More 10 28:54 2,218 444
5.0 7 Campbellsville 9 26:30 3,700 740
10.076923076923077 8 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 11 26:30 3,025 605
Rk Team gp td fg xpt 2pc dxp saf pts ppg
23.666666666666668 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 43 4 37 2 - - 314 44.9
25.25 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 23 2 20 - - - 166 23.7
24.583333333333332 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 27 3 26 1 - - 201 28.7
6.0 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 29 6 21 2 - - 217 31.0
13.8 5 Pikeville 7 16 3 15 - - - 120 17.1
22.5 6 Thomas More 7 21 4 19 - - - 157 22.4
5.0 7 Campbellsville 7 21 4 16 1 - - 156 22.3
28.2 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 16 4 13 - - - 121 17.3
Rk Team gp rush pass tot off ypg
23.666666666666668 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 1631 1688 3319 474.1
6.0 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 890 2128 3018 431.1
25.25 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 1224 1034 2258 322.6
13.8 4 Pikeville 7 732 1474 2206 315.1
24.583333333333332 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 943 1266 2209 315.6
5.0 6 Campbellsville 7 1119 1260 2379 339.9
22.5 7 Thomas More 7 1043 1119 2162 308.9
28.2 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 919 1184 2103 300.4
Rk Team gp yds comp-att-int yds/g yds/att yds/comp td
6.0 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 2128 114-234-17 304.0 9.1 18.7 17
23.666666666666668 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 1688 137-208-3 241.1 8.1 12.3 16
13.8 3 Pikeville 7 1474 142-251-11 210.6 5.9 10.4 12
24.583333333333332 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 1266 89-197-5 180.9 6.4 14.2 12
25.25 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 1034 100-194-11 147.7 5.3 10.3 9
5.0 6 Campbellsville 7 1260 110-217-8 180.0 5.8 11.5 9
22.5 7 Thomas More 7 1119 88-195-8 159.9 5.7 12.7 10
28.2 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 1184 108-207-7 169.1 5.7 11.0 6
Rk Team gp yds att yds/g avg td
23.666666666666668 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 1631 322 233.0 5.1 24
25.25 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 1224 297 174.9 4.1 14
6.0 3 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 890 237 127.1 3.8 11
5.0 4 Campbellsville 7 1119 281 159.9 4.0 10
24.583333333333332 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 943 282 134.7 3.3 12
28.2 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 919 299 131.3 3.1 9
13.8 7 Pikeville 7 732 240 104.6 3.0 4
22.5 8 Thomas More 7 1043 252 149.0 4.1 9
Rk Team gp total rush pass pen 1st/g
23.666666666666668 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 194 99 77 18 27.7
6.0 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 143 57 82 4 20.4
25.25 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 144 75 48 21 20.6
24.583333333333332 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 133 65 54 14 19.0
13.8 5 Pikeville 7 115 38 60 16 16.4
22.5 6 Thomas More 7 127 64 57 6 18.1
28.2 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 126 56 57 13 18.0
5.0 8 Campbellsville 7 130 63 58 9 18.6
Rk Team gp 3rd made 3rd % 4th made 4th %
23.666666666666668 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 61-109 56% 10-26 38%
6.0 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 33-95 35% 10-14 71%
24.583333333333332 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 31-108 29% 12-22 55%
13.8 4 Pikeville 7 40-121 33% 10-28 36%
5.0 5 Campbellsville 7 38-107 36% 8-22 36%
28.2 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 34-114 30% 7-21 33%
22.5 7 Thomas More 7 27-90 30% 7-13 54%
25.25 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 31-105 30% 10-25 40%
Rk Team gp kr ko avg pr avg
22.5 1 Thomas More 7 24-658 27.4 9-30 3.3
13.8 2 Pikeville 7 34-748 22.0 8-76 9.5
23.666666666666668 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 12-303 25.3 19-180 9.5
5.0 4 Campbellsville 7 46-966 21.0 5-21 4.2
24.583333333333332 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 17-340 20.0 21-197 9.4
25.25 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 31-586 18.9 10-78 7.8
6.0 7 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 24-496 20.7 9-51 5.7
28.2 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 22-330 15.0 12-82 6.8
Rk Team gp fg fg % pat pat % punts avg kickoffs avg
13.8 1 Pikeville 7 3-4 75.0% 15-16 93.8% 41-1489 36.3 26-1278 49.2
23.666666666666668 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 4-5 80.0% 37-41 90.2% 16-647 40.4 53-3057 57.7
5.0 3 Campbellsville 7 4-5 80.0% 16-17 94.1% 40-1426 35.6 31-1644 53.0
28.2 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 4-6 66.7% 13-14 92.9% 43-1466 34.1 27-1493 55.3
6.0 5 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 6-6 100.0% 21-24 87.5% 35-1324 37.8 42-2046 48.7
25.25 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 2-3 66.7% 20-23 87.0% 33-1368 41.5 32-1806 56.4
24.583333333333332 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 3-6 50.0% 26-26 100.0% 38-1464 38.5 37-2155 58.2
22.5 8 Thomas More 7 4-10 40.0% 19-21 90.5% 35-1459 41.7 33-1838 55.7
Rk Team gp scores rz % td td %
6.0 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 24-25 96% 18-25 72%
23.666666666666668 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 33-44 75% 29-44 66%
13.8 3 Pikeville 7 11-14 79% 8-14 57%
24.583333333333332 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 20-28 71% 18-28 64%
25.25 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 20-29 69% 19-29 66%
28.2 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 15-24 63% 12-24 50%
22.5 7 Thomas More 7 17-30 57% 14-30 47%
5.0 8 Campbellsville 7 15-26 58% 13-26 50%
Rk Team gp fum-lost fum rec int int yds int avg td tkl sack
22.5 1 Thomas More 7 11-7 4 14 14-315 22.5 2 508 14
24.583333333333332 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 10-7 8 12 12-295 24.6 3 466 31
28.2 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 16-5 7 5 5-141 28.2 1 429 19
13.8 4 Pikeville 7 11-7 5 5 5-69 13.8 0 553 20
25.25 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 14-7 10 8 8-202 25.3 0 545 13
23.666666666666668 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 8-4 10 15 15-355 23.7 1 381 28
6.0 7 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 10-8 8 7 7-42 6.0 0 606 18
5.0 8 Campbellsville 7 9-6 13 4 4-20 5.0 0 489 8
Rk Team gp pen pen/g pen yards pen yards/g
6.0 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 63 9.0 556 79.4
28.2 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 50 7.1 457 65.3
23.666666666666668 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 48 6.9 511 73.0
25.25 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 52 7.4 434 62.0
24.583333333333332 5 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 43 6.1 372 53.1
13.8 6 Pikeville 7 53 7.6 440 62.9
22.5 7 Thomas More 7 32 4.6 286 40.9
5.0 8 Campbellsville 7 34 4.9 391 55.9
Rk Team gp ppg pts yd/g pass y/g rush y/g tkl/g int fum rec sack td
5.0 1 Campbellsville 7 53.1 372 556.3 216.9 339.4 69.9 4 10 8 0
6.0 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 27.7 194 321.4 154.1 167.3 86.6 7 5 18 0
13.8 3 Pikeville 7 30.7 215 402.1 232.6 169.6 79.0 5 5 20 0
28.2 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 24.4 171 307.3 156.0 151.3 61.3 5 7 19 1
25.25 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 28.1 197 413.3 243.3 170.0 77.9 8 8 13 0
22.5 6 Thomas More 7 20.1 141 353.7 252.6 101.1 72.6 14 5 14 2
24.583333333333332 7 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 15.9 111 259.4 181.3 78.1 66.6 12 6 31 3
23.666666666666668 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 7.3 51 194.1 156.6 37.6 54.4 15 5 28 1
Rk Team gp top attend avg
23.666666666666668 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 7 36:11 5,238 1,746
28.2 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 7 34:52 1,939 647
24.583333333333332 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 7 32:33 13,545 3,387
13.8 4 Pikeville 7 30:30 950 317
25.25 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 7 30:55 0 0
22.5 6 Thomas More 7 28:52 2,218 555
5.0 7 Campbellsville 7 26:48 2,700 675
6.0 8 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 7 25:24 1,675 419