Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Baseball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
31.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 52 1656 543 407 238 304 .328 .427 .533
25.0 2 Concordia (MI) 62 1888 586 416 252 402 .310 .409 .480
20.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 1643 503 328 215 366 .306 .411 .470
16.0 4 Cornerstone 44 1333 395 262 162 341 .296 .388 .476
18.0 5 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1403 412 341 207 317 .294 .400 .483
22.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 1412 411 280 196 310 .291 .398 .457
20.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1588 444 270 185 351 .280 .377 .392
19.0 8 Lourdes 47 1383 376 255 185 290 .272 .374 .420
13.0 9 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1079 290 147 105 218 .269 .347 .370
19.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1269 336 208 180 293 .265 .379 .380
10.0 11 Siena Heights 51 1476 373 199 189 274 .253 .350 .317
10.0 11 Rochester 36 1056 263 168 143 313 .249 .355 .368
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
25.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 136 13 53 202
31.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 116 11 67 194
20.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 116 17 40 173
18.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 87 11 52 150
16.0 5 Cornerstone 44 80 15 43 138
22.0 6 Lawrence Tech 47 81 18 39 138
20.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 91 15 19 125
19.0 8 Lourdes 47 75 14 34 123
19.0 8 Cleary (Mich.) 44 60 22 14 96
10.0 10 Rochester 36 60 3 20 83
13.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 51 14 10 75
10.0 12 Siena Heights 51 54 10 7 71
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
25.0 1 Concordia (MI) 62 485 907 120 35
31.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 439 882 73 19
20.0 3 Indiana Tech 53 384 773 56 24
18.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 43 374 677 39 11
22.0 5 Lawrence Tech 47 330 645 116 40
20.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 315 622 58 21
16.0 7 Cornerstone 44 289 634 58 11
19.0 8 Lourdes 47 286 581 42 9
19.0 8 Cleary (Mich.) 44 232 482 37 15
10.0 10 Siena Heights 51 225 468 31 15
10.0 10 Rochester 36 191 389 39 20
13.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 36 168 399 13 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
31.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 52 70 31 17 30 320 435 .74 2012
25.0 2 Concordia (MI) 62 80 25 41 30 387 483 .80 2286
22.0 3 Lawrence Tech 47 69 22 18 17 312 363 .86 1717
20.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 75 20 19 32 354 411 .86 1887
20.0 4 Indiana Tech 53 90 20 42 31 383 384 1.00 2010
19.0 6 Cleary (Mich.) 44 66 19 15 22 288 335 .86 1549
19.0 6 Lourdes 47 53 19 11 29 334 362 .92 1651
18.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 55 18 11 21 224 370 .61 1694
16.0 9 Cornerstone 44 47 16 18 21 263 329 .80 1576
13.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 36 32 13 13 28 270 256 1.05 1242
10.0 11 Rochester 36 35 10 15 4 184 170 1.08 1259
10.0 11 Siena Heights 51 37 10 17 30 376 395 .95 1729
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
13.0 1 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 268.0 397 298 260 8.73
10.0 2 Rochester 36 36 268.1 348 310 248 8.32
20.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 383.0 485 396 329 7.73
10.0 4 Siena Heights 51 51 363.2 430 336 304 7.52
16.0 5 Cornerstone 44 44 323.2 369 309 267 7.42
19.0 6 Lourdes 47 47 339.2 400 291 254 6.73
19.0 6 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 324.0 363 297 240 6.67
18.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 337.2 387 296 235 6.26
25.0 9 Concordia (MI) 62 62 459.0 490 343 282 5.53
31.0 10 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 407.0 401 272 247 5.46
22.0 11 Lawrence Tech 47 47 358.2 367 252 208 5.22
20.0 12 Indiana Tech 53 53 400.0 414 264 231 5.20
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
10.0 1 Rochester 36 36 237 7.95 23 2.05
13.0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 36 36 167 5.61 25 2.00
20.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 52 307 7.21 25 1.83
16.0 4 Cornerstone 44 44 230 6.40 32 1.74
19.0 5 Cleary (Mich.) 44 44 234 6.50 26 1.72
10.0 6 Siena Heights 51 51 243 6.01 34 1.67
18.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 43 43 331 8.82 25 1.67
25.0 8 Concordia (MI) 62 62 427 8.37 46 1.65
19.0 9 Lourdes 47 47 240 6.36 32 1.62
22.0 10 Lawrence Tech 47 47 413 10.36 34 1.52
20.0 11 Indiana Tech 53 53 419 9.43 50 1.49
31.0 12 Northwestern Ohio 52 52 434 9.60 33 1.45
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
20.0 1 Indiana Tech 53 1682 1200 421 61 20 .964
10.0 2 Siena Heights 51 1522 1087 378 57 12 .963
31.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 52 1694 1221 408 65 16 .962
20.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 1667 1148 450 69 28 .959
19.0 5 Lourdes 47 1449 1019 370 60 24 .959
25.0 6 Concordia (MI) 62 1923 1377 460 86 22 .955
22.0 7 Lawrence Tech 47 1500 1076 355 69 28 .954
18.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 1429 1010 350 69 9 .952
16.0 9 Cornerstone 44 1405 971 366 68 29 .952
19.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 44 1410 951 390 69 16 .951
13.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 36 1169 802 296 71 16 .939
10.0 12 Rochester 36 1095 790 236 69 21 .937
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
19.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 44 22 70 28 .286 1
31.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 52 34 49 18 .269 0
13.0 3 Michigan-Dearborn 36 19 41 15 .268 1
10.0 4 Siena Heights 51 22 52 19 .268 0
16.0 5 Cornerstone 44 29 36 12 .250 0
20.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 52 25 72 22 .234 0
20.0 6 Indiana Tech 53 21 64 18 .220 1
18.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 43 27 41 11 .212 0
25.0 9 Concordia (MI) 62 36 57 13 .186 0
10.0 10 Rochester 36 19 45 9 .167 0
22.0 11 Lawrence Tech 47 23 66 12 .154 3
19.0 12 Lourdes 47 17 73 8 .099 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
20.0 1 Indiana Tech 13 1,353 105
20.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 14 1,235 89
25.0 3 Concordia (MI) 15 944 63
19.0 4 Lourdes 18 923 52
31.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 27 1,283 48
13.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 13 601 47
10.0 7 Rochester 12 555 47
22.0 8 Lawrence Tech 18 785 44
16.0 9 Cornerstone 12 395 33
10.0 10 Siena Heights 18 455 26
18.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
19.0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 14 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
15.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 655 226 197 101 102 .345 .447 .608
10.0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 691 200 122 86 128 .289 .383 .447
7.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 679 213 161 96 149 .314 .428 .502
9.0 4 Cornerstone 22 664 200 143 95 139 .301 .404 .492
10.0 5 Madonna (Mich.) 22 702 214 177 96 158 .305 .409 .494
9.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 691 204 141 84 123 .295 .388 .482
7.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 672 177 103 81 147 .263 .370 .388
6.0 8 Lourdes 22 666 179 106 70 126 .269 .357 .422
7.0 9 Michigan-Dearborn 22 651 174 73 67 125 .267 .349 .343
8.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 618 154 85 79 150 .249 .362 .354
5.0 11 Siena Heights 22 665 162 88 86 122 .244 .341 .296
6.0 12 Rochester 22 644 163 98 86 179 .253 .353 .356
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
10.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 44 4 19 67
15.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 58 6 34 98
7.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 49 11 19 79
10.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 43 6 26 75
9.0 5 Cornerstone 22 44 7 23 74
9.0 5 Lawrence Tech 22 35 8 26 69
7.0 7 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 46 7 8 61
6.0 8 Lourdes 22 33 6 19 58
8.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 27 13 4 44
6.0 10 Rochester 22 38 2 8 48
7.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 27 5 4 36
5.0 12 Siena Heights 22 21 4 2 27
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
10.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 145 309 28 12
15.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 207 398 32 11
7.0 3 Indiana Tech 22 182 341 24 11
10.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 199 347 24 4
9.0 5 Lawrence Tech 22 156 333 42 18
7.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 116 261 12 13
9.0 7 Cornerstone 22 157 327 31 6
6.0 8 Lourdes 22 115 281 13 1
8.0 9 Cleary (Mich.) 22 94 219 18 8
5.0 10 Siena Heights 22 96 197 15 7
6.0 11 Rochester 22 111 229 12 11
7.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 22 84 223 8 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
15.0 1 Northwestern Ohio 22 32 15 4 15 142 182 .78 807
10.0 2 Concordia (MI) 22 25 10 18 17 164 191 .86 830
9.0 3 Lawrence Tech 22 27 9 15 8 164 197 .83 826
7.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 37 7 4 14 155 174 .89 801
7.0 4 Indiana Tech 22 45 7 23 11 150 169 .89 850
8.0 6 Cleary (Mich.) 22 35 8 11 14 157 158 .99 751
6.0 7 Lourdes 22 25 6 8 19 175 179 .98 775
10.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 34 10 6 12 104 201 .52 848
9.0 9 Cornerstone 22 26 9 9 12 150 172 .87 803
7.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 22 18 7 12 18 188 167 1.13 755
6.0 11 Rochester 22 17 6 10 4 161 137 1.18 763
5.0 12 Siena Heights 22 15 5 5 13 176 188 .94 776
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
7.0 1 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 168.0 250 176 154 8.25
6.0 2 Rochester 22 22 164.2 210 172 143 7.82
7.0 3 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 168.0 194 173 146 7.82
5.0 4 Siena Heights 22 22 163.2 209 160 143 7.86
9.0 5 Cornerstone 22 22 164.1 190 144 122 6.68
6.0 6 Lourdes 22 22 167.0 200 161 147 7.92
8.0 7 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 165.1 196 147 114 6.21
10.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 166.2 163 120 90 4.86
10.0 8 Concordia (MI) 22 22 174.0 184 138 121 6.26
15.0 10 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 167.0 156 91 81 4.37
9.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 22 178.1 159 88 72 3.63
7.0 12 Indiana Tech 22 22 168.0 155 92 71 3.80
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
6.0 1 Rochester 22 22 135 7.38 14 2.00
7.0 2 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 107 5.73 17 1.95
7.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 120 6.43 12 1.88
9.0 4 Cornerstone 22 22 112 6.13 16 1.76
8.0 5 Cleary (Mich.) 22 22 108 5.88 9 1.71
5.0 6 Siena Heights 22 22 102 5.61 19 1.71
10.0 7 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 155 8.37 13 1.45
10.0 7 Concordia (MI) 22 22 152 7.86 27 1.66
6.0 9 Lourdes 22 22 98 5.28 22 1.64
9.0 10 Lawrence Tech 22 22 198 9.99 16 1.22
7.0 11 Indiana Tech 22 22 184 9.86 19 1.35
15.0 12 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 177 9.54 8 1.32
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
7.0 1 Indiana Tech 22 706 504 175 27 15 .962
5.0 2 Siena Heights 22 695 491 174 30 5 .957
15.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 22 706 501 179 26 9 .963
7.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 724 503 201 20 9 .972
6.0 5 Lourdes 22 724 501 195 28 15 .961
10.0 6 Concordia (MI) 22 710 522 159 29 10 .959
9.0 7 Lawrence Tech 22 746 535 184 27 15 .964
10.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 711 500 176 35 5 .951
9.0 9 Cornerstone 22 703 493 177 33 19 .953
8.0 10 Cleary (Mich.) 22 735 496 203 36 10 .951
7.0 11 Michigan-Dearborn 22 733 503 181 49 8 .933
6.0 12 Rochester 22 707 494 173 40 10 .943
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
8.0 1 Cleary (Mich.) 22 15 28 18 .391 1
15.0 2 Northwestern Ohio 22 19 10 4 .286 0
7.0 3 Michigan-Dearborn 22 15 25 12 .324 1
5.0 4 Siena Heights 22 8 19 14 .424 0
9.0 5 Cornerstone 22 16 16 4 .200 0
7.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 12 29 11 .275 0
7.0 6 Indiana Tech 22 7 18 6 .250 0
10.0 8 Madonna (Mich.) 22 16 15 8 .348 0
10.0 8 Concordia (MI) 22 14 16 4 .200 0
6.0 10 Rochester 22 12 21 8 .276 0
9.0 11 Lawrence Tech 22 13 17 6 .261 0
6.0 12 Lourdes 22 10 45 5 .100 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
7.0 1 Indiana Tech 10 1,087 109
7.0 1 Aquinas (Mich.) 12 1,114 93
10.0 3 Concordia (MI) 10 731 74
6.0 4 Lourdes 12 722 61
15.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 16 815 51
7.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 12 601 51
6.0 7 Rochester 10 555 56
9.0 8 Lawrence Tech 10 590 59
9.0 8 Cornerstone 10 295 30
5.0 10 Siena Heights 10 310 31
10.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 10 175 18
8.0 12 Cleary (Mich.) 10 0 0