Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2023 Wolverine-Hoosier Athletic Conference Softball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
40.0 1 Concordia (MI) 61 1691 595 327 132 193 .352 .402 .495
36.0 2 Indiana Tech 53 1473 466 271 160 202 .316 .392 .434
55.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 49 1276 403 242 115 182 .316 .374 .470
28.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 53 1458 451 255 134 173 .309 .371 .428
105.0 5 Siena Heights 43 1116 322 163 92 160 .289 .348 .386
58.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 1377 391 223 168 236 .284 .367 .429
55.0 7 Cornerstone 42 1131 321 175 121 208 .284 .357 .428
38.0 8 Lawrence Tech 42 1079 305 165 89 183 .283 .345 .381
51.0 9 Lourdes 38 1009 272 117 69 147 .270 .321 .345
27.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 43 1145 307 159 113 176 .268 .343 .359
35.0 11 Cleary (MI) 43 1114 280 116 72 147 .251 .306 .293
32.0 12 Rochester 26 602 128 51 34 147 .213 .264 .289
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
40.0 1 Concordia (MI) 61 96 22 34 152
58.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 84 13 30 127
55.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 49 84 13 29 126
28.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 53 73 26 16 115
36.0 5 Indiana Tech 53 78 16 21 115
55.0 6 Cornerstone 42 46 18 27 91
27.0 7 Michigan-Dearborn 43 56 3 14 73
105.0 8 Siena Heights 43 48 11 13 72
38.0 9 Lawrence Tech 42 50 10 12 72
51.0 10 Lourdes 38 48 2 8 58
35.0 11 Cleary (MI) 43 32 4 2 38
32.0 12 Rochester 26 25 3 5 33
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
40.0 1 Concordia (MI) 61 363 837 145 18
36.0 2 Indiana Tech 53 323 639 113 26
28.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 53 285 624 131 26
55.0 4 Northwestern Ohio 49 269 600 83 16
58.0 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 267 591 145 20
55.0 6 Cornerstone 42 204 484 54 13
27.0 7 Michigan-Dearborn 43 187 411 58 15
38.0 8 Lawrence Tech 42 185 411 70 13
105.0 9 Siena Heights 43 179 431 25 12
35.0 10 Cleary (MI) 43 143 326 65 16
51.0 11 Lourdes 38 133 348 38 4
32.0 12 Rochester 26 57 174 3 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
40.0 1 Concordia (MI) 61 20 13 66 11 433 461 .94 1922
36.0 2 Indiana Tech 53 34 18 29 15 323 451 .72 1714
28.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 53 17 12 18 13 370 436 .85 1639
58.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 20 13 26 7 306 414 .74 1604
55.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 49 10 10 26 12 297 383 .78 1437
27.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 43 23 9 32 14 286 353 .81 1322
55.0 7 Cornerstone 42 17 15 35 11 284 327 .87 1319
105.0 8 Siena Heights 43 19 18 48 12 321 330 .97 1293
35.0 9 Cleary (MI) 43 17 4 27 11 333 307 1.08 1234
38.0 10 Lawrence Tech 42 17 6 33 4 259 296 .88 1224
51.0 11 Lourdes 38 9 5 22 15 277 304 .91 1114
32.0 12 Rochester 26 8 1 4 9 165 145 1.14 649
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
32.0 1 Rochester 26 26 147.2 279 225 178 8.44
35.0 2 Cleary (MI) 43 43 271.0 366 261 207 5.35
105.0 3 Siena Heights 43 43 277.0 376 272 191 4.83
51.0 4 Lourdes 38 38 240.0 302 200 142 4.14
38.0 5 Lawrence Tech 42 42 267.1 300 183 151 3.95
55.0 6 Cornerstone 42 42 284.0 345 185 141 3.48
55.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 49 49 308.0 352 181 140 3.18
27.0 8 Michigan-Dearborn 43 43 289.1 300 139 103 2.49
36.0 9 Indiana Tech 53 53 366.2 318 161 130 2.48
40.0 10 Concordia (MI) 61 61 405.2 399 194 137 2.36
58.0 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 51 337.0 342 157 100 2.08
28.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 53 53 358.1 279 125 100 1.95
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
32.0 1 Rochester 26 26 60 2.84 15 2.42
105.0 2 Siena Heights 43 43 145 3.66 19 1.83
35.0 3 Cleary (MI) 43 43 175 4.52 24 1.83
51.0 4 Lourdes 38 38 145 4.23 10 1.70
38.0 5 Lawrence Tech 42 42 171 4.48 17 1.60
55.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 49 49 175 3.98 17 1.47
55.0 6 Cornerstone 42 42 154 3.80 12 1.45
27.0 8 Michigan-Dearborn 43 43 240 5.81 10 1.42
40.0 9 Concordia (MI) 61 61 266 4.59 19 1.32
58.0 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 51 237 4.92 8 1.23
36.0 11 Indiana Tech 53 53 274 5.23 11 1.13
28.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 53 53 404 7.89 9 1.07
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
28.0 1 Madonna (Mich.) 53 1400 1075 272 53 4 .962
36.0 2 Indiana Tech 53 1507 1100 347 60 10 .960
40.0 3 Concordia (MI) 61 1777 1216 486 75 12 .958
27.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 43 1214 868 291 55 11 .955
55.0 5 Cornerstone 42 1261 852 348 61 13 .952
55.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 49 1290 923 302 65 12 .950
38.0 7 Lawrence Tech 42 1115 784 273 58 8 .948
35.0 8 Cleary (MI) 43 1146 813 271 62 8 .946
58.0 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 1527 1007 435 85 1 .944
51.0 10 Lourdes 38 1090 720 303 67 13 .939
105.0 11 Siena Heights 43 1199 831 278 90 19 .925
32.0 12 Rochester 26 687 443 180 64 22 .907
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
40.0 1 Concordia (MI) 61 18 51 21 .292 0
28.0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 53 4 35 10 .222 0
35.0 3 Cleary (MI) 43 8 66 17 .205 0
55.0 4 Northwestern Ohio 49 19 48 12 .200 0
58.0 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 51 14 62 13 .173 0
38.0 6 Lawrence Tech 42 7 68 12 .150 0
36.0 7 Indiana Tech 53 7 58 8 .121 0
27.0 8 Michigan-Dearborn 43 9 66 9 .120 0
105.0 9 Siena Heights 43 14 81 10 .110 0
51.0 10 Lourdes 38 20 73 8 .099 1
32.0 11 Rochester 26 8 86 8 .085 1
55.0 12 Cornerstone 42 8 78 7 .082 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
105.0 1 Siena Heights 18.0 1,881 105
58.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 11.0 631 58
55.0 3 Cornerstone 14.0 769 55
55.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 18.0 975 55
51.0 5 Lourdes 10.0 509 51
40.0 6 Concordia (MI) 11.0 440 40
38.0 7 Lawrence Tech 14.0 520 38
36.0 8 Indiana Tech 23.0 807 36
35.0 9 Cleary (MI) 12.0 418 35
32.0 10 Rochester 10.0 318 32
28.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 15.0 420 28
27.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 12.0 320 27
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
38.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 643 229 114 31 76 .356 .388 .524
39.0 2 Indiana Tech 22 629 205 109 72 90 .326 .406 .461
48.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 22 569 191 127 54 81 .336 .395 .513
42.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 623 177 101 62 72 .284 .355 .368
108.0 5 Siena Heights 22 539 144 81 44 94 .267 .331 .349
64.0 6 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 600 169 107 68 111 .282 .360 .442
56.0 7 Cornerstone 22 602 177 106 64 126 .294 .365 .463
52.0 8 Lawrence Tech 22 558 160 81 36 84 .287 .336 .389
50.0 9 Lourdes 22 591 157 64 29 92 .266 .302 .345
27.0 10 Michigan-Dearborn 22 590 160 81 59 111 .271 .349 .378
35.0 11 Cleary (MI) 22 582 141 60 35 86 .242 .295 .290
32.0 12 Rochester 22 503 101 31 23 133 .201 .247 .264
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
38.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 39 6 19 64
64.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 38 2 18 58
48.0 3 Northwestern Ohio 22 47 9 12 68
42.0 4 Madonna (Mich.) 22 30 5 4 39
39.0 5 Indiana Tech 22 33 5 14 52
56.0 6 Cornerstone 22 24 9 20 53
27.0 7 Michigan-Dearborn 22 34 1 9 44
108.0 8 Siena Heights 22 27 7 1 35
52.0 9 Lawrence Tech 22 25 7 6 38
50.0 10 Lourdes 22 30 1 5 36
35.0 11 Cleary (MI) 22 19 3 1 23
32.0 12 Rochester 22 15 1 5 21
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
38.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 128 337 58 7
39.0 2 Indiana Tech 22 134 290 44 7
42.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 22 110 229 59 11
48.0 4 Northwestern Ohio 22 139 292 31 9
64.0 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 127 265 67 9
56.0 6 Cornerstone 22 116 279 29 7
27.0 7 Michigan-Dearborn 22 98 223 30 8
52.0 8 Lawrence Tech 22 89 217 37 6
108.0 9 Siena Heights 22 89 188 15 5
35.0 10 Cleary (MI) 22 77 169 32 4
50.0 11 Lourdes 22 69 204 21 3
32.0 12 Rochester 22 34 133 2 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
38.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 5 4 20 6 169 174 .97 703
39.0 2 Indiana Tech 22 17 6 14 7 134 196 .68 738
42.0 3 Madonna (Mich.) 22 8 2 2 6 151 201 .75 697
64.0 4 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 10 9 9 1 111 204 .54 696
48.0 5 Northwestern Ohio 22 4 4 10 3 124 169 .73 641
27.0 6 Michigan-Dearborn 22 14 5 17 7 122 181 .67 685
56.0 7 Cornerstone 22 8 9 12 6 134 161 .83 695
108.0 8 Siena Heights 22 12 9 23 7 146 163 .90 627
35.0 9 Cleary (MI) 22 9 1 12 4 170 165 1.03 639
52.0 10 Lawrence Tech 22 7 3 19 2 144 168 .86 623
50.0 11 Lourdes 22 3 2 13 7 159 176 .90 638
32.0 12 Rochester 22 8 0 4 7 134 122 1.10 538
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
32.0 1 Rochester 22 22 123.2 233 185 148 8.38
35.0 2 Cleary (MI) 22 22 140.0 214 144 125 6.25
108.0 3 Siena Heights 22 22 138.1 184 135 93 4.71
50.0 4 Lourdes 22 22 139.0 166 109 75 3.78
52.0 5 Lawrence Tech 22 22 139.1 163 113 97 4.87
56.0 6 Cornerstone 22 22 148.2 197 112 85 4.00
48.0 7 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 138.0 150 67 60 3.04
27.0 8 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 148.1 157 92 68 3.21
39.0 9 Indiana Tech 22 22 154.0 122 63 52 2.36
38.0 10 Concordia (MI) 22 22 150.0 149 68 53 2.47
64.0 11 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 147.1 166 72 43 2.04
42.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 154.2 110 49 34 1.54
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
32.0 1 Rochester 22 22 49 2.77 15 2.37
108.0 2 Siena Heights 22 22 68 3.44 8 1.73
35.0 3 Cleary (MI) 22 22 99 4.95 19 1.92
50.0 4 Lourdes 22 22 90 4.53 7 1.62
52.0 5 Lawrence Tech 22 22 85 4.27 16 1.71
48.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 22 80 4.06 7 1.36
56.0 7 Cornerstone 22 22 73 3.44 8 1.53
27.0 8 Michigan-Dearborn 22 22 120 5.66 7 1.40
38.0 9 Concordia (MI) 22 22 86 4.01 10 1.31
64.0 10 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 22 107 5.08 5 1.34
39.0 11 Indiana Tech 22 22 118 5.36 9 0.98
42.0 12 Madonna (Mich.) 22 22 181 8.19 3 1.01
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
42.0 1 Madonna (Mich.) 22 599 464 110 25 1 .958
39.0 2 Indiana Tech 22 643 462 155 26 1 .960
38.0 3 Concordia (MI) 22 633 449 160 24 4 .962
27.0 4 Michigan-Dearborn 22 644 445 159 40 6 .938
56.0 5 Cornerstone 22 673 446 190 37 8 .945
48.0 6 Northwestern Ohio 22 567 414 136 17 6 .970
52.0 7 Lawrence Tech 22 596 418 148 30 2 .950
35.0 8 Cleary (MI) 22 584 420 140 24 3 .959
64.0 9 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 670 442 189 39 0 .942
50.0 10 Lourdes 22 620 417 169 34 7 .945
108.0 11 Siena Heights 22 611 415 150 46 14 .925
32.0 12 Rochester 22 570 371 149 50 20 .912
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
38.0 1 Concordia (MI) 22 9 17 8 .320 0
42.0 2 Madonna (Mich.) 22 1 16 7 .304 0
35.0 3 Cleary (MI) 22 3 35 14 .286 0
48.0 4 Northwestern Ohio 22 7 26 6 .188 0
64.0 5 Aquinas (Mich.) 22 6 27 9 .250 0
52.0 6 Lawrence Tech 22 - 46 7 .132 0
39.0 7 Indiana Tech 22 5 18 1 .053 0
27.0 8 Michigan-Dearborn 22 6 29 3 .094 0
108.0 9 Siena Heights 22 4 41 4 .089 0
50.0 10 Lourdes 22 10 51 6 .105 0
32.0 11 Rochester 22 7 72 6 .077 1
56.0 12 Cornerstone 22 5 47 5 .096 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
108.0 1 Siena Heights 14.0 1,504 108
64.0 2 Aquinas (Mich.) 10.0 631 64
56.0 3 Cornerstone 12.0 665 56
48.0 4 Northwestern Ohio 12.0 570 48
50.0 5 Lourdes 8.0 395 50
38.0 6 Concordia (MI) 10.0 375 38
52.0 7 Lawrence Tech 10.0 520 52
39.0 8 Indiana Tech 10.0 381 39
35.0 9 Cleary (MI) 12.0 418 35
32.0 10 Rochester 10.0 318 32
42.0 11 Madonna (Mich.) 10.0 420 42
27.0 12 Michigan-Dearborn 12.0 320 27