Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Mid-South Conference Softball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
11.0 1 Campbellsville 56 1520 541 422 209 226 .356 .445 .607
6.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 1594 524 348 183 251 .329 .418 .498
7.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 1640 506 323 147 213 .309 .369 .484
9.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 1378 401 231 126 230 .291 .364 .424
12.0 5 Thomas More 46 1239 359 182 120 208 .290 .358 .396
13.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 1364 395 201 150 194 .290 .364 .404
2.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 1180 332 161 79 199 .281 .334 .388
10.0 8 Tennessee Southern 52 1343 376 210 108 176 .280 .355 .409
6.0 9 Shawnee State 50 1396 383 193 81 216 .274 .324 .375
5.0 10 Pikeville 50 1227 303 127 112 248 .247 .324 .309
16.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 1271 302 154 94 179 .238 .306 .334
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
11.0 1 Campbellsville 56 109 10 84 203
7.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 97 19 51 167
6.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 96 12 50 158
9.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 93 6 26 125
10.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 69 10 28 107
13.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 76 10 20 106
6.0 7 Shawnee State 50 73 11 15 99
12.0 8 Thomas More 46 69 9 15 93
16.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 62 14 11 87
2.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 59 5 19 83
5.0 11 Pikeville 50 55 3 5 63
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
16.0 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 170 425 64 16
13.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 243 551 108 13
12.0 3 Thomas More 46 214 491 27 12
11.0 4 Campbellsville 56 453 922 60 11
10.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 246 549 48 10
9.0 6 Bethel (TN) 50 267 584 63 9
7.0 7 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 345 794 82 7
6.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 385 794 58 6
6.0 8 Shawnee State 50 212 523 37 6
5.0 10 Pikeville 50 158 379 34 5
2.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 172 458 11 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
6.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 71 14 21 16 392 404 .97 1883
7.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 22 20 37 10 379 538 .70 1866
11.0 3 Campbellsville 56 51 20 41 11 302 442 .68 1841
9.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 39 12 42 8 372 322 1.16 1597
13.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 22 20 30 14 344 412 .83 1586
10.0 6 Tennessee Southern 52 54 10 44 10 375 407 .92 1559
6.0 7 Shawnee State 50 24 4 32 11 345 346 1.00 1537
16.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 36 9 23 4 370 379 .98 1433
5.0 9 Pikeville 50 32 7 25 13 300 353 .85 1403
12.0 10 Thomas More 46 18 10 10 18 316 325 .97 1397
2.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 18 6 20 11 292 340 .86 1303
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
5.0 1 Pikeville 50 50 302.2 452 340 276 6.38
12.0 2 Thomas More 46 46 291.2 420 295 251 6.02
9.0 3 Bethel (TN) 50 50 327.1 410 277 242 5.18
16.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 48 318.1 414 254 210 4.62
10.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 52 339.2 407 266 216 4.45
11.0 6 Campbellsville 56 56 352.2 443 243 195 3.87
6.0 7 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 55 369.1 395 243 203 3.85
2.0 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 42 285.0 359 207 141 3.46
6.0 9 Shawnee State 50 50 324.2 298 169 133 2.87
13.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 51 348.0 326 119 100 2.01
7.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 60 412.0 253 88 72 1.22
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
12.0 1 Thomas More 46 46 189 4.54 34 1.95
5.0 2 Pikeville 50 50 178 4.12 36 1.85
16.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 48 138 3.03 30 1.67
10.0 4 Tennessee Southern 52 52 161 3.32 21 1.64
9.0 5 Bethel (TN) 50 50 146 3.12 35 1.62
2.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 42 138 3.39 16 1.55
11.0 7 Campbellsville 56 56 195 3.87 17 1.52
6.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 55 279 5.29 46 1.41
6.0 8 Shawnee State 50 50 177 3.82 16 1.28
13.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 51 235 4.73 14 1.15
7.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 60 502 8.53 13 0.91
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
7.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 1671 1236 396 39 5 .977
13.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 1531 1044 436 51 13 .967
6.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 1472 1108 308 56 2 .962
6.0 3 Shawnee State 50 1541 971 511 59 9 .962
12.0 5 Thomas More 46 1262 875 333 54 7 .957
10.0 6 Tennessee Southern 52 1487 1019 403 65 10 .956
11.0 7 Campbellsville 56 1598 1049 472 77 10 .952
9.0 8 Bethel (TN) 50 1388 939 381 68 10 .951
16.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 1355 951 336 68 5 .950
5.0 10 Pikeville 50 1382 906 401 75 20 .946
2.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 1326 855 371 100 21 .925
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
7.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 3 28 10 .263 0
13.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 28 23 8 .258 0
6.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 17 33 7 .175 0
11.0 4 Campbellsville 56 12 41 8 .163 1
5.0 5 Pikeville 50 5 69 12 .148 0
9.0 6 Bethel (TN) 50 9 43 7 .140 1
12.0 7 Thomas More 46 7 65 9 .122 0
10.0 8 Tennessee Southern 52 13 72 9 .111 0
16.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 12 60 7 .104 0
2.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 14 35 4 .103 0
6.0 11 Shawnee State 50 15 43 4 .085 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
6.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 22.0 2,430 111
10.0 2 Tennessee Southern 30.0 1,802 61
2.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 24.0 1,075 45
16.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 20.0 802 41
9.0 5 Bethel (TN) 19.0 590 32
5.0 6 Pikeville 22.0 595 28
13.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 20.0 472 24
11.0 8 Campbellsville 21.0 460 22
7.0 9 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24.0 131 6
12.0 10 Thomas More 20.0 0 0
6.0 11 Shawnee State 19.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
4.0 1 Campbellsville 30 813 319 262 110 99 .392 .478 .705
3.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 889 306 208 98 125 .344 .432 .528
3.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 891 306 198 83 88 .343 .404 .535
6.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 898 263 147 63 153 .293 .354 .440
9.0 5 Thomas More 31 835 248 119 74 134 .297 .361 .404
7.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 742 225 109 90 79 .303 .384 .423
1.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 875 232 111 60 144 .265 .320 .376
5.0 8 Tennessee Southern 32 834 235 125 53 96 .282 .350 .434
3.0 9 Shawnee State 31 843 217 82 39 154 .257 .300 .339
1.0 10 Pikeville 30 699 146 40 54 147 .209 .281 .246
11.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 748 164 86 55 106 .219 .292 .303
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
4.0 1 Campbellsville 30 70 5 58 133
3.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 54 15 29 98
3.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 62 7 29 98
6.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 61 4 21 86
5.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 49 9 20 78
7.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 44 6 11 61
3.0 7 Shawnee State 31 38 2 9 49
9.0 8 Thomas More 31 44 6 11 61
11.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 34 4 7 45
1.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 42 5 15 62
1.0 10 Pikeville 30 24 1 0 25
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
11.0 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 93 227 41 11
7.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 137 314 72 7
9.0 3 Thomas More 31 136 337 18 9
4.0 4 Campbellsville 30 280 573 32 4
5.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 145 362 26 5
6.0 6 Bethel (TN) 32 172 395 39 6
3.0 7 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 209 477 39 3
3.0 7 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 226 469 28 3
3.0 7 Shawnee State 31 96 286 22 3
1.0 10 Pikeville 30 53 172 7 1
1.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 116 329 5 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
3.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 42 4 8 8 231 206 1.12 1041
3.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 14 9 20 5 208 285 .73 1017
4.0 3 Campbellsville 30 37 15 21 5 166 241 .69 996
6.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 26 8 24 5 248 210 1.18 1019
7.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 14 10 16 7 204 230 .89 872
5.0 6 Tennessee Southern 32 36 4 29 7 255 243 1.05 956
3.0 7 Shawnee State 31 13 3 21 5 231 229 1.01 919
11.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 24 5 14 2 227 229 .99 846
1.0 9 Pikeville 30 17 3 10 9 190 202 .94 783
9.0 10 Thomas More 31 13 7 4 12 229 203 1.13 933
1.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 13 5 14 9 232 255 .91 967
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1.0 1 Pikeville 30 30 174.2 308 247 204 8.18
9.0 2 Thomas More 31 31 197.2 287 209 187 6.62
6.0 3 Bethel (TN) 32 32 210.0 270 185 168 5.60
11.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 29 191.0 277 177 149 5.46
5.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 32 205.0 270 196 158 5.40
4.0 6 Campbellsville 30 30 182.2 213 108 88 3.37
3.0 7 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 30 198.2 219 138 114 4.02
1.0 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 32 214.0 277 157 117 3.83
3.0 9 Shawnee State 31 31 206.1 221 138 107 3.63
7.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 28 188.0 170 48 44 1.64
3.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 31 214.0 149 59 47 1.54
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
9.0 1 Thomas More 31 31 124 4.39 29 2.02
1.0 2 Pikeville 30 30 92 3.69 27 2.14
11.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 29 75 2.75 23 1.87
5.0 4 Tennessee Southern 32 32 94 3.21 14 1.79
6.0 5 Bethel (TN) 32 32 94 3.13 31 1.64
1.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 32 105 3.43 14 1.54
4.0 7 Campbellsville 30 30 110 4.22 8 1.41
3.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 30 143 5.04 30 1.48
3.0 8 Shawnee State 31 31 99 3.36 15 1.49
7.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 28 127 4.73 8 1.08
3.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 31 262 8.57 11 0.97
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
3.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 873 642 206 25 0 .971
7.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 815 564 229 22 5 .973
3.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 794 596 171 27 1 .966
3.0 3 Shawnee State 31 884 619 226 39 7 .956
9.0 5 Thomas More 31 857 593 229 35 4 .959
5.0 6 Tennessee Southern 32 895 615 236 44 10 .951
4.0 7 Campbellsville 30 821 548 236 37 4 .955
6.0 8 Bethel (TN) 32 919 630 247 42 10 .954
11.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 806 570 197 39 5 .952
1.0 10 Pikeville 30 801 524 224 53 11 .934
1.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 987 642 278 67 18 .932
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
3.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 1 18 4 .182 0
7.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 16 10 4 .286 0
3.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 8 20 4 .167 0
4.0 4 Campbellsville 30 7 13 3 .188 0
1.0 5 Pikeville 30 4 45 5 .100 0
6.0 6 Bethel (TN) 32 3 21 6 .222 0
9.0 7 Thomas More 31 4 41 6 .128 0
5.0 8 Tennessee Southern 32 7 54 5 .085 0
11.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 8 44 5 .102 0
1.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 9 25 4 .138 0
3.0 11 Shawnee State 31 7 38 1 .026 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
3.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 14.0 1,480 106
5.0 2 Tennessee Southern 16.0 1,298 82
1.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 16.0 791 50
11.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 15.0 477 32
6.0 5 Bethel (TN) 16.0 500 32
1.0 6 Pikeville 14.0 220 16
7.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 14.0 377 27
4.0 8 Campbellsville 16.0 400 25
3.0 9 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 16.0 0 0
9.0 10 Thomas More 16.0 0 0
3.0 11 Shawnee State 15.0 0 0