Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Mid-South Conference Softball Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
22.0 1 Campbellsville 56 1520 541 422 209 226 .356 .445 .607
111.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 1594 524 348 183 251 .329 .418 .498
6.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 1640 506 323 147 213 .309 .369 .484
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 1378 401 231 126 230 .291 .364 .424
0.0 5 Thomas More 46 1239 359 182 120 208 .290 .358 .396
24.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 1364 395 201 150 194 .290 .364 .404
45.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 1180 332 161 79 199 .281 .334 .388
61.0 8 Tennessee Southern 52 1343 376 210 108 176 .280 .355 .409
0.0 9 Shawnee State 50 1396 383 193 81 216 .274 .324 .375
28.0 10 Pikeville 50 1227 303 127 112 248 .247 .324 .309
41.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 1271 302 154 94 179 .238 .306 .334
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
22.0 1 Campbellsville 56 109 10 84 203
6.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 97 19 51 167
111.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 96 12 50 158
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 93 6 26 125
61.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 69 10 28 107
24.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 76 10 20 106
0.0 7 Shawnee State 50 73 11 15 99
0.0 7 Thomas More 46 69 9 15 93
41.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 62 14 11 87
45.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 59 5 19 83
28.0 11 Pikeville 50 55 3 5 63
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
22.0 1 Campbellsville 56 453 922 60 11
111.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 385 794 58 6
6.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 345 794 82 7
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 267 584 63 9
61.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 246 549 48 10
24.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 243 551 108 13
0.0 7 Thomas More 46 214 491 27 12
0.0 7 Shawnee State 50 212 523 37 6
45.0 9 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 172 458 11 2
41.0 10 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 170 425 64 16
28.0 11 Pikeville 50 158 379 34 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
111.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 71 14 21 16 392 404 .97 1883
6.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 22 20 37 10 379 538 .70 1866
22.0 3 Campbellsville 56 51 20 41 11 302 442 .68 1841
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 50 39 12 42 8 372 322 1.16 1597
24.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 22 20 30 14 344 412 .83 1586
61.0 6 Tennessee Southern 52 54 10 44 10 375 407 .92 1559
0.0 7 Shawnee State 50 24 4 32 11 345 346 1.00 1537
41.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 36 9 23 4 370 379 .98 1433
28.0 9 Pikeville 50 32 7 25 13 300 353 .85 1403
0.0 10 Thomas More 46 18 10 10 18 316 325 .97 1397
45.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 18 6 20 11 292 340 .86 1303
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
28.0 1 Pikeville 50 50 302.2 452 340 276 6.38
0.0 2 Thomas More 46 46 291.2 420 295 251 6.02
32.0 3 Bethel (TN) 50 50 327.1 410 277 242 5.18
41.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 48 318.1 414 254 210 4.62
61.0 5 Tennessee Southern 52 52 339.2 407 266 216 4.45
22.0 6 Campbellsville 56 56 352.2 443 243 195 3.87
111.0 7 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 55 369.1 395 243 203 3.85
45.0 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 42 285.0 359 207 141 3.46
0.0 9 Shawnee State 50 50 324.2 298 169 133 2.87
24.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 51 348.0 326 119 100 2.01
6.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 60 412.0 253 88 72 1.22
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.0 1 Thomas More 46 46 189 4.54 34 1.95
28.0 2 Pikeville 50 50 178 4.12 36 1.85
41.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 48 138 3.03 30 1.67
61.0 4 Tennessee Southern 52 52 161 3.32 21 1.64
32.0 5 Bethel (TN) 50 50 146 3.12 35 1.62
45.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 42 138 3.39 16 1.55
22.0 7 Campbellsville 56 56 195 3.87 17 1.52
111.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 55 279 5.29 46 1.41
0.0 9 Shawnee State 50 50 177 3.82 16 1.28
24.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 51 235 4.73 14 1.15
6.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 60 502 8.53 13 0.91
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
6.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 1671 1236 396 39 5 .977
24.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 1531 1044 436 51 13 .967
111.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 1472 1108 308 56 2 .962
0.0 4 Shawnee State 50 1541 971 511 59 9 .962
0.0 4 Thomas More 46 1262 875 333 54 7 .957
61.0 6 Tennessee Southern 52 1487 1019 403 65 10 .956
22.0 7 Campbellsville 56 1598 1049 472 77 10 .952
32.0 8 Bethel (TN) 50 1388 939 381 68 10 .951
41.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 1355 951 336 68 5 .950
28.0 10 Pikeville 50 1382 906 401 75 20 .946
45.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 1326 855 371 100 21 .925
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
6.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 60 3 28 10 .263 0
24.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 51 28 23 8 .258 0
111.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 55 17 33 7 .175 0
22.0 4 Campbellsville 56 12 41 8 .163 1
28.0 5 Pikeville 50 5 69 12 .148 0
32.0 6 Bethel (TN) 50 9 43 7 .140 1
0.0 7 Thomas More 46 7 65 9 .122 0
61.0 8 Tennessee Southern 52 13 72 9 .111 0
41.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 48 12 60 7 .104 0
45.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 42 14 35 4 .103 0
0.0 11 Shawnee State 50 15 43 4 .085 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
111.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 22.0 2,430 111
61.0 2 Tennessee Southern 30.0 1,802 61
45.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 24.0 1,075 45
41.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 20.0 802 41
32.0 5 Bethel (TN) 19.0 590 32
28.0 6 Pikeville 22.0 595 28
24.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 20.0 472 24
22.0 8 Campbellsville 21.0 460 22
6.0 9 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 24.0 131 6
0.0 10 Shawnee State 19.0 0 0
0.0 10 Thomas More 20.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
25.0 1 Campbellsville 30 813 319 262 110 99 .392 .478 .705
106.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 889 306 208 98 125 .344 .432 .528
0.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 891 306 198 83 88 .343 .404 .535
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 898 263 147 63 153 .293 .354 .440
0.0 5 Thomas More 31 835 248 119 74 134 .297 .361 .404
27.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 742 225 109 90 79 .303 .384 .423
50.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 875 232 111 60 144 .265 .320 .376
82.0 8 Tennessee Southern 32 834 235 125 53 96 .282 .350 .434
0.0 9 Shawnee State 31 843 217 82 39 154 .257 .300 .339
16.0 10 Pikeville 30 699 146 40 54 147 .209 .281 .246
32.0 11 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 748 164 86 55 106 .219 .292 .303
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
25.0 1 Campbellsville 30 70 5 58 133
0.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 54 15 29 98
106.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 62 7 29 98
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 61 4 21 86
82.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 49 9 20 78
27.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 44 6 11 61
0.0 7 Shawnee State 31 38 2 9 49
0.0 7 Thomas More 31 44 6 11 61
32.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 34 4 7 45
50.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 42 5 15 62
16.0 11 Pikeville 30 24 1 0 25
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
25.0 1 Campbellsville 30 280 573 32 4
106.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 226 469 28 3
0.0 3 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 209 477 39 3
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 172 395 39 6
82.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 145 362 26 5
27.0 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 137 314 72 7
0.0 7 Thomas More 31 136 337 18 9
0.0 7 Shawnee State 31 96 286 22 3
50.0 9 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 116 329 5 1
32.0 10 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 93 227 41 11
16.0 11 Pikeville 30 53 172 7 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
106.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 42 4 8 8 231 206 1.12 1041
0.0 2 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 14 9 20 5 208 285 .73 1017
25.0 3 Campbellsville 30 37 15 21 5 166 241 .69 996
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 32 26 8 24 5 248 210 1.18 1019
27.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 14 10 16 7 204 230 .89 872
82.0 6 Tennessee Southern 32 36 4 29 7 255 243 1.05 956
0.0 7 Shawnee State 31 13 3 21 5 231 229 1.01 919
32.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 24 5 14 2 227 229 .99 846
16.0 9 Pikeville 30 17 3 10 9 190 202 .94 783
0.0 10 Thomas More 31 13 7 4 12 229 203 1.13 933
50.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 13 5 14 9 232 255 .91 967
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
16.0 1 Pikeville 30 30 174.2 308 247 204 8.18
0.0 2 Thomas More 31 31 197.2 287 209 187 6.62
32.0 3 Bethel (TN) 32 32 210.0 270 185 168 5.60
32.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 29 191.0 277 177 149 5.46
82.0 5 Tennessee Southern 32 32 205.0 270 196 158 5.40
25.0 6 Campbellsville 30 30 182.2 213 108 88 3.37
106.0 7 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 30 198.2 219 138 114 4.02
50.0 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 32 214.0 277 157 117 3.83
0.0 9 Shawnee State 31 31 206.1 221 138 107 3.63
27.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 28 188.0 170 48 44 1.64
0.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 31 214.0 149 59 47 1.54
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.0 1 Thomas More 31 31 124 4.39 29 2.02
16.0 2 Pikeville 30 30 92 3.69 27 2.14
32.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 29 75 2.75 23 1.87
82.0 4 Tennessee Southern 32 32 94 3.21 14 1.79
32.0 5 Bethel (TN) 32 32 94 3.13 31 1.64
50.0 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 32 105 3.43 14 1.54
25.0 7 Campbellsville 30 30 110 4.22 8 1.41
106.0 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 30 143 5.04 30 1.48
0.0 9 Shawnee State 31 31 99 3.36 15 1.49
27.0 10 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 28 127 4.73 8 1.08
0.0 11 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 31 262 8.57 11 0.97
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 873 642 206 25 0 .971
27.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 815 564 229 22 5 .973
106.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 794 596 171 27 1 .966
0.0 4 Shawnee State 31 884 619 226 39 7 .956
0.0 4 Thomas More 31 857 593 229 35 4 .959
82.0 6 Tennessee Southern 32 895 615 236 44 10 .951
25.0 7 Campbellsville 30 821 548 236 37 4 .955
32.0 8 Bethel (TN) 32 919 630 247 42 10 .954
32.0 8 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 806 570 197 39 5 .952
16.0 10 Pikeville 30 801 524 224 53 11 .934
50.0 11 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 987 642 278 67 18 .932
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.0 1 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 31 1 18 4 .182 0
27.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 28 16 10 4 .286 0
106.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 30 8 20 4 .167 0
25.0 4 Campbellsville 30 7 13 3 .188 0
16.0 5 Pikeville 30 4 45 5 .100 0
32.0 6 Bethel (TN) 32 3 21 6 .222 0
0.0 7 Thomas More 31 4 41 6 .128 0
82.0 8 Tennessee Southern 32 7 54 5 .085 0
32.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 29 8 44 5 .102 0
50.0 10 Cumberland (Tenn.) 32 9 25 4 .138 0
0.0 11 Shawnee State 31 7 38 1 .026 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
106.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 14.0 1,480 106
82.0 2 Tennessee Southern 16.0 1,298 82
50.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 16.0 791 50
32.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 15.0 477 32
32.0 4 Bethel (TN) 16.0 500 32
16.0 6 Pikeville 14.0 220 16
27.0 7 Cumberlands (Ky.) 14.0 377 27
25.0 8 Campbellsville 16.0 400 25
0.0 9 Freed-Hardeman (Tenn.) 16.0 0 0
0.0 9 Shawnee State 15.0 0 0
0.0 9 Thomas More 16.0 0 0