Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS SITE OF THE NAIA

2022 Mid-South Conference Football Team Stats

Rk Team gp td fg xpt 2pc dxp saf pts ppg
37.75 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 61 11 52 1 - - 453 37.8
33.5 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 44 8 43 - 1 - 335 33.5
32.6 3 Pikeville 10 46 5 29 3 - - 326 32.6
29.5 4 Campbellsville (KY) 10 37 11 30 5 - - 295 29.5
29.083333333333332 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 44 14 35 3 - - 349 29.1
23.3 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 30 9 24 - - - 233 23.3
22.636363636363637 7 Thomas More 11 32 6 29 1 0 0 249 22.6
21.3 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 26 9 24 - - - 213 21.3
19.272727272727273 9 Faulkner (AL) 11 28 7 21 1 - - 212 19.3
Rk Team gp rush pass tot off ypg
463.8 1 Pikeville 10 1066 3572 4638 463.8
415.25 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 1582 3401 4983 415.3
381.1 3 Campbellsville (KY) 10 928 2883 3811 381.1
370.8 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 1416 2292 3708 370.8
340.25 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 1863 2220 4083 340.3
330.9 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 1463 1846 3309 330.9
302.09090909090907 7 Thomas More 11 1077 2246 3323 302.1
278.90909090909093 8 Faulkner (AL) 11 1037 2031 3068 278.9
224.3 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 824 1419 2243 224.3
Rk Team gp yds comp-att-int yds/g yds/att yds/comp td
357.2 1 Pikeville 10 3572 253-451-16 357.2 7.9 14.1 28
288.3 2 Campbellsville (KY) 10 2883 262-429-11 288.3 6.7 11.0 18
283.4166666666667 3 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 3401 218-367-8 283.4 9.3 15.6 32
229.2 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 2292 199-350-15 229.2 6.5 11.5 26
204.1818181818182 5 Thomas More 11 2246 204-358-13 204.2 6.3 11.0 18
185.0 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 2220 199-361-8 185.0 6.1 11.2 22
184.63636363636363 7 Faulkner (AL) 11 2031 169-310-11 184.6 6.6 12.0 15
184.6 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 1846 167-339-7 184.6 5.4 11.1 12
141.9 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 1419 150-285-3 141.9 5.0 9.5 12
Rk Team gp yds att yds/g avg td
155.25 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 1863 483 155.3 3.9 16
146.3 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 1463 392 146.3 3.7 15
141.6 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 1416 404 141.6 3.5 16
131.83333333333334 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 1582 434 131.8 3.6 22
106.6 5 Pikeville 10 1066 309 106.6 3.4 14
97.9090909090909 6 Thomas More 11 1077 389 97.9 2.8 14
94.27272727272727 7 Faulkner (AL) 11 1037 417 94.3 2.5 10
92.8 8 Campbellsville (KY) 10 928 343 92.8 2.7 16
82.4 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 824 343 82.4 2.4 8
Rk Team gp total rush pass pen 1st/g
23.2 1 Pikeville 10 232 69 144 19 23.2
23.0 2 Campbellsville (KY) 10 230 75 137 18 23.0
22.8 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 228 96 119 13 22.8
22.5 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 270 110 147 13 22.5
21.0 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 210 100 83 27 21.0
20.666666666666668 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 248 111 109 28 20.7
18.727272727272727 7 Faulkner (AL) 11 206 70 97 39 18.7
17.727272727272727 8 Thomas More 11 195 70 105 20 17.7
14.7 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 147 62 69 16 14.7
Rk Team gp 3rd made 3rd % 4th made 4th %
0.4226190476190476 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 71-168 42% 23-36 64%
0.39375 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 63-160 39% 10-17 59%
0.39215686274509803 3 Pikeville 10 60-153 39% 12-34 35%
0.38860103626943004 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 75-193 39% 12-23 52%
0.3575757575757576 5 Campbellsville (KY) 10 59-165 36% 11-28 39%
0.3488372093023256 6 Thomas More 11 60-172 35% 10-25 40%
0.3485714285714286 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 61-175 35% 12-24 50%
0.33986928104575165 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 52-153 34% 3-13 23%
0.3151515151515151 9 Faulkner (AL) 11 52-165 32% 9-19 47%
Rk Team gp kr ko avg pr avg
27.142857142857142 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 21-570 27.1 37-444 12.0
23.74074074074074 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 27-641 23.7 38-493 13.0
23.192307692307693 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 26-603 23.2 12-99 8.3
22.647058823529413 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 34-770 22.6 11-79 7.2
22.03448275862069 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 29-639 22.0 15-85 5.7
21.093023255813954 6 Thomas More 11 43-907 21.1 18-132 7.3
19.16216216216216 7 Faulkner (AL) 11 37-709 19.2 15-64 4.3
17.257142857142856 8 Pikeville 10 35-604 17.3 18-66 3.7
16.916666666666668 9 Campbellsville (KY) 10 48-812 16.9 14-209 14.9
Rk Team gp fg fg % pat pat % punts avg kickoffs avg
0.7857142857142857 1 Campbellsville (KY) 10 11-14 78.6% 30-31 96.8% 56-2057 36.7 56-3227 57.6
0.75 2 Thomas More 11 6-8 75.0% 29-31 93.5% 70-2742 39.2 50-2639 52.8
0.6428571428571429 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 9-14 64.3% 24-27 88.9% 71-2850 40.1 45-2519 56.0
0.6363636363636364 4 Faulkner (AL) 11 7-11 63.6% 21-23 91.3% 71-2479 34.9 46-2249 48.9
0.625 5 Pikeville 10 5-8 62.5% 29-40 72.5% 38-1414 37.2 61-2831 46.4
0.6153846153846154 6 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 8-13 61.5% 43-44 97.7% 39-1657 42.5 62-3203 51.7
0.6111111111111112 7 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 11-18 61.1% 52-57 91.2% 53-2044 38.6 82-4268 52.0
0.6 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 9-15 60.0% 24-27 88.9% 66-2327 35.3 49-2549 52.0
0.5185185185185185 9 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 14-27 51.9% 35-36 97.2% 55-2117 38.5 69-4001 58.0
Rk Team gp scores rz % td td %
0.8 1 Thomas More 11 24-30 80% 20-30 67%
0.7962962962962963 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 43-54 80% 35-54 65%
0.7878787878787878 3 Faulkner (AL) 11 26-33 79% 20-33 61%
0.7872340425531915 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 37-47 79% 29-47 62%
0.7777777777777778 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 28-36 78% 19-36 53%
0.7727272727272727 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 17-22 77% 10-22 45%
0.7674418604651163 7 Campbellsville (KY) 10 33-43 77% 24-43 56%
0.7254901960784313 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 37-51 73% 29-51 57%
0.6888888888888889 9 Pikeville 10 31-45 69% 26-45 58%
Rk Team gp fum-lost fum rec int int yds int avg td tkl sack
15.0 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 15-10 15 18 18-183 10.2 4 929 26
14.0 2 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 12-9 14 10 10-130 13.0 2 751 43
10.0 3 Campbellsville (KY) 10 20-10 10 14 14-209 14.9 2 674 11
10.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 15-5 10 15 15-139 9.3 1 623 23
10.0 3 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 8-6 10 10 10-245 24.5 4 761 52
9.0 6 Faulkner (AL) 11 19-10 9 14 14-195 13.9 3 672 16
8.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 7-2 8 7 7-57 8.1 2 670 19
7.0 8 Thomas More 11 11-7 7 11 11-196 17.8 0 695 25
5.0 9 Pikeville 10 17-12 5 17 17-345 20.3 3 691 21
Rk Team gp pen pen/g pen yards pen yards/g
100.0 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 100 8.3 995 82.9
92.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 92 7.7 807 67.3
80.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 80 8.0 740 74.0
79.0 4 Thomas More 11 79 7.2 790 71.8
74.0 5 Campbellsville (KY) 10 74 7.4 658 65.8
72.0 6 Faulkner (AL) 11 72 6.5 680 61.8
61.0 7 Pikeville 10 61 6.1 731 73.1
45.0 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 45 4.5 383 38.3
41.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 41 4.1 346 34.6
Rk Team gp ppg pts yd/g pass y/g rush y/g tkl/g int fum rec sack td
10.25 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 10.3 123 215.5 184.4 31.1 63.4 10 10 52 4
13.7 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 13.7 137 260.9 172.4 88.5 62.3 15 7 23 1
13.75 3 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 13.8 165 274.8 158.8 115.9 77.4 18 11 26 4
23.2 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 23.2 232 360.8 267.4 93.4 75.1 10 9 43 2
25.6 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 25.6 256 388.8 251.8 137.0 67.0 7 11 19 2
27.727272727272727 6 Thomas More 11 27.7 305 346.2 241.0 105.2 63.2 11 6 25 0
32.72727272727273 7 Faulkner (AL) 11 32.7 360 352.4 230.2 122.2 61.1 14 6 16 3
34.8 8 Pikeville 10 34.8 348 411.9 276.1 135.8 69.1 17 5 21 3
41.2 9 Campbellsville (KY) 10 41.2 412 452.1 239.4 212.7 67.4 14 8 11 2
Rk Team gp top attend avg
33:20 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 10 33:20 4,550 910
31:32 2 Faulkner (AL) 11 31:32 2,910 582
31:18 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 10 31:18 8,232 1,372
30:54 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 12 30:54 6,465 924
30:20 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 12 30:20 7,818 1,303
29:39 6 Thomas More 11 29:39 2,165 433
29:33 7 Campbellsville (KY) 10 29:33 8,000 1,600
28:57 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 10 28:57 1,125 225
24:45 9 Pikeville 10 24:45 1,935 387
Rk Team gp td fg xpt 2pc dxp saf pts ppg
39.375 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 42 9 34 1 - - 315 39.4
30.125 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 31 7 30 - 1 - 241 30.1
30.75 3 Pikeville 8 34 5 21 3 - - 246 30.8
24.125 4 Campbellsville (KY) 8 23 10 17 4 - - 193 24.1
26.5 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 26 10 22 1 - - 212 26.5
21.75 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 23 5 19 - - - 174 21.8
21.125 7 Thomas More 8 21 5 20 - - - 169 21.1
17.375 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 16 7 16 - - - 139 17.4
21.375 9 Faulkner (AL) 8 23 5 18 - - - 171 21.4
Rk Team gp rush pass tot off ypg
448.875 1 Pikeville 8 965 2626 3591 448.9
443.0 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 1054 2490 3544 443.0
368.625 3 Campbellsville (KY) 8 400 2549 2949 368.6
362.375 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 1088 1811 2899 362.4
341.75 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 1320 1414 2734 341.8
335.75 6 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 1129 1557 2686 335.8
296.25 7 Thomas More 8 802 1568 2370 296.3
310.0 8 Faulkner (AL) 8 837 1643 2480 310.0
195.625 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 451 1114 1565 195.6
Rk Team gp yds comp-att-int yds/g yds/att yds/comp td
328.25 1 Pikeville 8 2626 186-343-14 328.3 7.7 14.1 19
318.625 2 Campbellsville (KY) 8 2549 238-390-11 318.6 6.5 10.7 13
311.25 3 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 2490 169-273-5 311.3 9.1 14.7 23
226.375 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 1811 154-278-15 226.4 6.5 11.8 16
196.0 5 Thomas More 8 1568 141-247-6 196.0 6.3 11.1 13
176.75 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 1414 135-242-7 176.8 5.8 10.5 13
205.375 7 Faulkner (AL) 8 1643 128-221-10 205.4 7.4 12.8 13
194.625 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 1557 137-275-7 194.6 5.7 11.4 10
139.25 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 1114 119-232-3 139.3 4.8 9.4 7
Rk Team gp yds att yds/g avg td
165.0 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 1320 334 165.0 4.0 9
141.125 2 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 1129 304 141.1 3.7 11
136.0 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 1088 317 136.0 3.4 13
131.75 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 1054 281 131.8 3.8 13
120.625 5 Pikeville 8 965 272 120.6 3.5 12
100.25 6 Thomas More 8 802 270 100.3 3.0 8
104.625 7 Faulkner (AL) 8 837 313 104.6 2.7 9
50.0 8 Campbellsville (KY) 8 400 254 50.0 1.6 7
56.375 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 451 264 56.4 1.7 3
Rk Team gp total rush pass pen 1st/g
22.875 1 Pikeville 8 183 61 107 15 22.9
23.125 2 Campbellsville (KY) 8 185 47 125 13 23.1
21.125 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 169 71 92 6 21.1
24.25 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 194 75 112 7 24.3
21.0 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 168 78 69 21 21.0
21.75 6 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 174 82 71 21 21.8
20.25 7 Faulkner (AL) 8 162 54 77 31 20.3
16.625 8 Thomas More 8 133 47 73 13 16.6
12.875 9 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 103 39 53 11 12.9
Rk Team gp 3rd made 3rd % 4th made 4th %
0.40441176470588236 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 55-136 40% 19-31 61%
0.3925233644859813 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 42-107 39% 8-10 80%
0.40625 3 Pikeville 8 52-128 41% 9-25 36%
0.40310077519379844 4 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 52-129 40% 6-16 38%
0.3333333333333333 5 Campbellsville (KY) 8 46-138 33% 10-27 37%
0.3220338983050847 6 Thomas More 8 38-118 32% 6-19 32%
0.3617021276595745 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 51-141 36% 11-20 55%
0.288 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 36-125 29% 3-12 25%
0.3333333333333333 9 Faulkner (AL) 8 38-114 33% 8-16 50%
Rk Team gp kr ko avg pr avg
26.235294117647058 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 17-446 26.2 27-275 10.2
22.0625 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 16-353 22.1 26-317 12.2
22.130434782608695 3 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 23-509 22.1 9-80 8.9
21.24137931034483 4 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 29-616 21.2 11-79 7.2
23.0 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 25-575 23.0 9-93 10.3
21.419354838709676 6 Thomas More 8 31-664 21.4 12-64 5.3
18.916666666666668 7 Faulkner (AL) 8 24-454 18.9 13-56 4.3
14.23076923076923 8 Pikeville 8 26-370 14.2 14-63 4.5
17.3953488372093 9 Campbellsville (KY) 8 43-748 17.4 8-173 21.6
Rk Team gp fg fg % pat pat % punts avg kickoffs avg
0.8333333333333334 1 Campbellsville (KY) 8 10-12 83.3% 17-18 94.4% 47-1733 36.9 39-2139 54.8
0.8333333333333334 1 Thomas More 8 5-6 83.3% 20-22 90.9% 51-2018 39.6 36-1813 50.4
0.6363636363636364 3 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 7-11 63.6% 16-17 94.1% 63-2492 39.6 31-1732 55.9
0.625 4 Faulkner (AL) 8 5-8 62.5% 18-20 90.0% 44-1542 35.0 36-1834 50.9
0.625 4 Pikeville 8 5-8 62.5% 21-29 72.4% 32-1181 36.9 47-2279 48.5
0.6363636363636364 6 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 7-11 63.6% 30-31 96.8% 32-1369 42.8 46-2314 50.3
0.6 7 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 9-15 60.0% 34-39 87.2% 32-1198 37.4 59-3018 51.2
0.5 8 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 5-10 50.0% 19-21 90.5% 52-1837 35.3 36-1875 52.1
0.625 9 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 10-16 62.5% 22-22 100.0% 37-1433 38.7 44-2570 58.4
Rk Team gp scores rz % td td %
0.8823529411764706 1 Thomas More 8 15-17 88% 12-17 71%
0.8 2 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 28-35 80% 22-35 63%
0.8076923076923077 3 Faulkner (AL) 8 21-26 81% 17-26 65%
0.7714285714285715 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 27-35 77% 20-35 57%
0.7307692307692307 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 19-26 73% 14-26 54%
0.7333333333333333 6 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 11-15 73% 6-15 40%
0.6875 7 Campbellsville (KY) 8 22-32 69% 14-32 44%
0.7575757575757576 8 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 25-33 76% 19-33 58%
0.71875 9 Pikeville 8 23-32 72% 18-32 56%
Rk Team gp fum-lost fum rec int int yds int avg td tkl sack
10.0 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 11-7 10 16 16-174 10.9 4 593 22
10.0 1 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 9-6 10 8 8-130 16.3 2 605 39
4.0 3 Campbellsville (KY) 8 15-6 4 8 8-164 20.5 2 535 7
9.0 4 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 14-4 9 9 9-65 7.2 1 501 19
6.0 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 6-4 6 4 4-45 11.3 2 521 43
8.0 6 Faulkner (AL) 8 15-10 8 9 9-88 9.8 1 493 14
5.0 7 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 7-2 5 5 5-41 8.2 1 544 18
6.0 8 Thomas More 8 6-4 6 4 4-121 30.3 0 513 19
5.0 9 Pikeville 8 11-9 5 15 15-289 19.3 3 559 18
Rk Team gp pen pen/g pen yards pen yards/g
70.0 1 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 70 8.8 725 90.6
63.0 2 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 63 7.9 522 65.3
62.0 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 62 7.8 586 73.3
60.0 4 Thomas More 8 60 7.5 624 78.0
54.0 5 Campbellsville (KY) 8 54 6.8 475 59.4
61.0 6 Faulkner (AL) 8 61 7.6 571 71.4
39.0 7 Pikeville 8 39 4.9 373 46.6
36.0 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 36 4.5 307 38.4
31.0 9 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 31 3.9 289 36.1
Rk Team gp ppg pts yd/g pass y/g rush y/g tkl/g int fum rec sack td
10.25 1 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 10.3 82 212.5 194.9 17.6 65.1 4 6 43 2
14.625 2 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 14.6 117 260.3 166.1 94.1 62.6 9 6 19 1
15.0 3 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 15.0 120 272.9 181.1 91.8 74.1 16 7 22 4
27.5 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 27.5 220 398.4 305.5 92.9 75.6 8 5 39 2
28.125 5 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 28.1 225 398.6 261.6 137.0 68.0 5 8 18 1
25.125 6 Thomas More 8 25.1 201 319.3 226.8 92.5 64.1 4 6 19 0
30.75 7 Faulkner (AL) 8 30.8 246 324.4 207.8 116.6 61.6 9 6 14 1
33.125 8 Pikeville 8 33.1 265 413.5 285.9 127.6 69.9 15 4 18 3
48.0 9 Campbellsville (KY) 8 48.0 384 502.5 266.9 235.6 66.9 8 4 7 2
Rk Team gp top attend avg
33:09 1 Georgetown (Ky.) 8 33:09 4,550 1,138
31:18 2 Faulkner (AL) 8 31:18 2,910 728
31:07 3 Cumberland (Tenn.) 8 31:07 6,243 1,561
31:41 4 Bethel (TN) Bethel (TN) 8 31:41 3,400 850
31:32 5 Lindsey Wilson (Ky.) 8 31:32 5,658 1,415
29:15 6 Thomas More 8 29:15 1,650 413
29:36 7 Campbellsville (KY) 8 29:36 6,500 1,625
29:01 8 Cumberlands (Ky.) 8 29:01 1,125 282
25:09 9 Pikeville 8 25:09 1,435 359